rust/src/test/compile-fail/break-outside-loop.rs, branch 0.4 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust http://git.dreamy.place/mirrors/rust/atom?h=0.4 2012-07-14T19:19:36+00:00 Tear out ty_str and ty_vec. 2012-07-14T19:19:36+00:00 Michael Sullivan sully@msully.net 2012-07-14T19:19:36+00:00 urn:sha1:d884085f43f87213e3045e474c39908d6555153a Disallow ret inside of block functions 2012-03-26T10:45:47+00:00 Marijn Haverbeke marijnh@gmail.com 2012-03-26T10:39:20+00:00 urn:sha1:87e097a85346c947cea60b000677bae10409b804 Also adds proper checking for cont/break being inside a loop. Closes #1854 Issue #1619 More rigorous reuse of cleanup sequences 2012-02-16T15:37:33+00:00 Marijn Haverbeke marijnh@gmail.com 2012-02-15T12:57:29+00:00 urn:sha1:e62ddf48988087d19934e1fdc6abb6de5f7a6a02 In both landing pads and break/cont/ret unwinding. Closes #300 Reformat 2011-08-20T18:04:00+00:00 Brian Anderson banderson@mozilla.com 2011-08-19T22:16:48+00:00 urn:sha1:518dc52f85c2efb67aaa1208c02e9a7e0bdaca49 This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[] Remove all xfail-stage0 directives 2011-08-03T17:55:59+00:00 Brian Anderson banderson@mozilla.com 2011-08-03T06:46:52+00:00 urn:sha1:c53402846ea7fabe8595c3f50cbc786db16d087a While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0. Reformat for new syntax 2011-07-27T13:54:33+00:00 Marijn Haverbeke marijnh@gmail.com 2011-07-27T12:19:39+00:00 urn:sha1:df7f21db093b0f206048b18e977161f91b7c28f1 Remove variable name 'res' from test suite 2011-06-25T19:15:04+00:00 Marijn Haverbeke marijnh@gmail.com 2011-06-25T15:45:49+00:00 urn:sha1:781a265b88f7fc3c8c406b327e8a548e742d6224 Add xfail-stage0 to some tests (not sure if it matters...) 2011-06-14T19:27:23+00:00 Tim Chevalier chevalier@alum.wellesley.edu 2011-06-14T18:28:34+00:00 urn:sha1:753268161241b16f7c2ef4c9df6e8c72bee93558 Friendlier error message for break outside a loop 2011-06-10T21:34:01+00:00 Tim Chevalier chevalier@alum.wellesley.edu 2011-06-10T21:34:01+00:00 urn:sha1:774c6d01984b608047afedb5d8c579c00d69823f The typechecker should really check for this, but at least now there's an error message rather than an inexhaustive match failure in trans.