rust/src/test/compile-fail/non-constant-expr-for-vec-repeat.rs, branch 1.0.0-beta https://github.com/rust-lang/rust http://git.dreamy.place/mirrors/rust/atom?h=1.0.0-beta 2015-04-01T00:56:07+00:00 Fallout from changes for overflow-checking during constant evaluation. 2015-04-01T00:56:07+00:00 Felix S. Klock II pnkfelix@pnkfx.org 2015-03-29T23:23:15+00:00 urn:sha1:8d54ea3ec9c48eaeaab8fa9061cf28c2678e8ae9 Update compile fail tests to use usize. 2015-01-08T16:02:24+00:00 Huon Wilson dbau.pp+github@gmail.com 2015-01-08T11:02:42+00:00 urn:sha1:85f961e2ccf056965fd7a95c44ce0922a865ae8d Allow use of `[_ ; n]` syntax for fixed length and repeating arrays. 2014-12-20T02:23:29+00:00 Nick Cameron ncameron@mozilla.com 2014-12-20T02:20:51+00:00 urn:sha1:2e86929a4a5a36f3993e577b4582ba70d84bbb40 This does NOT break any existing programs because the `[_, ..n]` syntax is also supported. Adjust the error messages to match the pattern "expected foo, found bar" 2014-08-24T07:53:01+00:00 Jonas Hietala tradet.h@gmail.com 2014-08-23T10:41:32+00:00 urn:sha1:9968ae255495704cb0c3fc1f43d2df2e84c20d5e Closes #8492 librustc: Remove the fallback to `int` from typechecking. 2014-06-25T00:18:48+00:00 Niko Matsakis niko@alum.mit.edu 2014-04-21T21:58:52+00:00 urn:sha1:9e3d0b002a5c2e81d43351c9b8550a3f4ccfb8f9 This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are: * `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`; * `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`; * `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`. RFC #30. Closes #6023. [breaking-change] Add tests for const exprs in fixed vec length type and vec repeat. 2013-03-19T00:31:42+00:00 Luqman Aden me@luqman.ca 2013-03-06T21:34:44+00:00 urn:sha1:d7d17dc14e653332848f7f6f994b34eb7fc923ec