https://github.com/rust-lang/rust http://git.dreamy.place/mirrors/rust/atom?h=1.56.0 2021-09-01T21:31:16+00:00 2021-09-01T21:31:16+00:00 bors bors@rust-lang.org 2021-09-01T21:31:16+00:00 urn:sha1:767edcf61630ee05a19e2be9085a153750b4d102 Display associated types of implementors Fixes #86631. Contrary to before, it doesn't display methods. I also had to "resurrect" the `auto-hide-trait-implementations` setting. :3 Only question at this point: should I move the `render_impl` boolean arguments into one struct? We're starting to have quite a lot of them... cc `@cynecx` r? `@camelid` 2021-09-01T18:34:51+00:00 Guillaume Gomez guillaume.gomez@huawei.com 2021-09-01T18:34:51+00:00 urn:sha1:92dae39b64224ca9f706f5de8df09a72559947c5 2021-09-01T09:01:42+00:00 Guillaume Gomez guillaume.gomez@huawei.com 2021-08-30T14:47:17+00:00 urn:sha1:d7159bdbad331266a4b62dd316408f54e225e53e 2021-09-01T07:23:27+00:00 Mara Bos m-ou.se@m-ou.se 2021-09-01T07:23:27+00:00 urn:sha1:75b2ae5ec50a3fb3cadd297b7d524935afa9faad Remove bolding on associated constants Associated types don't get bolded, so it looks off to have one kind bolded and one not. 2021-08-31T16:53:21+00:00 Noah Lev camelidcamel@gmail.com 2021-08-23T17:49:56+00:00 urn:sha1:87e39ac1ec0df8c45a4441cf6bb905d7fd282354 Associated types don't get bolded, so it looks off to have one kind bolded and one not. 2021-08-28T09:44:02+00:00 Guillaume Gomez guillaume.gomez@huawei.com 2021-08-28T09:43:55+00:00 urn:sha1:261ee26ac53c5fc034587d2a3710142991da8249 2021-08-28T09:44:02+00:00 Guillaume Gomez guillaume.gomez@huawei.com 2021-08-28T09:43:21+00:00 urn:sha1:1c3aedd23ab89b03bae389ec501845d03da63015 2021-08-19T17:30:09+00:00 Guillaume Gomez guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com 2021-08-19T17:30:09+00:00 urn:sha1:10165f8af915ac4d57281694ea6a90041c76b5bd [rustdoc] Wrap code blocks in <code> tag This PR modifies Rustdoc output so that fenced code snippets, items and whole file source codes are wrapped in `<pre><code>` instead of just `<pre>`. This should improve the semantic meaning of the generated content. I'm not sure what to do about `render_attributes_in_pre` and `render_attributes_in_code`. These functions were clearly expected to be used for things inside `<pre>` or `<code>`, and since I added `<code>` in this PR, some of them will be used in a different context than before. However, it seems to me that even before they were not consistent. For example, `item_constant` used `render_attributes_in_code` for its attributes, however there was no `<code>` used for constants before this PR... Should I create some `rustdoc-gui` tests? For example to check that all `<pre>` tags have a `<code>` child? Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88020 2021-08-19T08:30:08+00:00 Jakub Beránek berykubik@gmail.com 2021-08-16T21:19:00+00:00 urn:sha1:ccd550ee565436b4c9b7f987c19bd3a9111714f1 2021-08-16T19:50:13+00:00 Stefan Schindler dns2utf8@estada.ch 2021-08-16T19:38:30+00:00 urn:sha1:2f486d5f8d77256c4bba91b135f62e66fcc85e04