rust/tests/rustdoc-js-std/parser-returned.js, branch tryhttps://github.com/rust-lang/rust
http://git.dreamy.place/mirrors/rust/atom?h=try2024-10-30T17:35:38+00:00rustdoc-search: pass original names through AST2024-10-30T17:35:38+00:00Michael Howellmichael@notriddle.com2024-09-24T19:33:09+00:00urn:sha1:5c7e7dfe10acde559ad78a700dfefbfaf0ed8772rustdoc-search: allow trailing `Foo ->` arg search2024-09-06T00:58:05+00:00Michael Howellmichael@notriddle.com2024-09-06T00:58:05+00:00urn:sha1:3699e939e8f6a2517806a219c082723d50dd4288rustdoc-search: make primitives and keywords less special2023-11-21T20:59:26+00:00Michael Howellmichael@notriddle.com2023-11-20T20:37:57+00:00urn:sha1:28f17d97a9e7276a383e11e91ef2d4159e670726
The search sorting code already sorts by item type discriminant,
putting things with smaller discriminants first. There was
also a special case for sorting keywords and primitives earlier,
and this commit removes it by giving them lower discriminants.
The sorting code has another criteria where items with descriptions
appear earlier than items without, and that criteria has higher
priority than the item type. This shouldn't matter, though,
because primitives and keywords normally only appear in the
standard library, and it always gives them descriptions.
rustdoc-search: search never type with `!`2023-06-13T00:30:23+00:00Michael Howellmichael@notriddle.com2023-06-12T21:56:54+00:00urn:sha1:db277f528407864e24d3d7934d9c23e28d950165
This feature extends rustdoc to support the syntax that most users will
naturally attempt to use to search for diverging functions.
Part of #60485
It's already possible to do this search with `primitive:never`, but
that's not what the Rust language itself uses, so nobody will try it if
they aren't told or helped along.
Update rustdoc-js* format2023-06-09T15:00:47+00:00Guillaume Gomezguillaume.gomez@huawei.com2023-06-09T14:49:38+00:00urn:sha1:9803651ee84545f8913b6fe9e76c8bd13603bb6erustdoc: add support for type filters in arguments and generics2023-03-21T05:41:57+00:00Michael Howellmichael@notriddle.com2023-03-01T01:17:59+00:00urn:sha1:e600c0ba0e0b8153e68c4cead3d92b2c52ca8914
This makes sense, since the search index has the information in it,
and it's more useful for function signature searches since a
function signature search's item type is, by definition, some type
of function (there's more than one, but not very many).
Move /src/test to /tests2023-01-11T09:32:08+00:00Albert Larsan74931857+albertlarsan68@users.noreply.github.com2023-01-05T08:13:28+00:00urn:sha1:cf2dff2b1e3fa55fa5415d524200070d0d7aacfe