rust/tests/rustdoc, branch beta

Auto merge of #138736 - azhogin:azhogin/sanitizers-target-modificators, r=rcvalle

2025-09-04T22:51:33+00:00

Sanitizers target modificators Depends on bool flag fix: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138483. Some sanitizers need to be target modifiers, and some do not. For now, we should mark all sanitizers as target modifiers except for these: AddressSanitizer, LeakSanitizer For kCFI, the helper flag -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers should also be a target modifier. Many test errors was with sanizer flags inconsistent with std deps. Tests are fixed with `-C unsafe-allow-abi-mismatch`.

Add tests for `doc(attribute = "...")` attribute

2025-08-28T13:56:30+00:00

Auto merge of #137229 - GuillaumeGomez:expand-macro, r=lolbinarycat

2025-08-24T19:46:17+00:00

Add support for macro expansion in rustdoc source code pages This is what it looks like: ![Screenshot From 2025-02-18 18-08-51](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ce2b3806-6218-47df-94bf-e9e9ed40cd41) ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/891042db-8632-4dba-9343-e28570c058fe) You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/macro-expansion/src/lib/lib.rs.html). In this case, I also enabled the `--generate-link-to-definition` to show that both options work well together. Note: There is a bug currently in firefox where the line numbers are not displayed correctly if they're inside the "macro expansion" span: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1949948 ~~Found a workaround around this bug. r? `@notriddle`~~

rustdoc: render attributes in Field and Variants sections

2025-08-24T10:01:08+00:00

rustdoc: update attribute tests

2025-08-23T09:27:03+00:00

Also support statements and patterns for macro expansion

2025-08-22T22:57:29+00:00

-Zsanitize and -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers flags are now target modifiers with custom consistency check function

2025-08-21T09:08:00+00:00

rustdoc-search: search backend with partitioned suffix tree

2025-08-15T17:26:03+00:00

rustdoc: Allow multiple references to a single footnote

2025-08-14T04:39:31+00:00

Multiple references to a single footnote is a part of GitHub Flavored Markdown syntax (although not explicitly documented as well as regular footnotes, it is implemented in GitHub's fork of CommonMark) and not prohibited by rustdoc. cf. However, using it makes multiple "sup" elements with the same "id" attribute, which is invalid per the HTML specification. Still, not only this is a valid GitHub Flavored Markdown syntax, this is helpful on certain cases and actually tested (accidentally) in tests/rustdoc/footnote-reference-in-footnote-def.rs. This commit keeps track of the number of references per footnote and gives unique ID to each reference. It also emits *all* back links from a footnote to its references as "↩" (return symbol) plus a numeric list in superscript. As a known limitation, it assumes that all references to a footnote are rendered (this is not always true if a dangling footnote has one or more references but considered a reasonable compromise). Also note that, this commit is designed so that no HTML changes will occur unless multiple references to a single footnote is actually used.

test: Add rustdoc test for enum negative overflow

2025-08-10T15:02:53+00:00