rust/tests/ui/attributes, branch perf-tmphttps://github.com/rust-lang/rust
http://git.dreamy.place/mirrors/rust/atom?h=perf-tmp2025-10-02T08:27:49+00:00Rollup merge of #146535 - joshtriplett:mbe-unsafe-attr, r=petrochenkov2025-10-02T08:27:49+00:00Matthias Krüger476013+matthiaskrgr@users.noreply.github.com2025-10-02T08:27:49+00:00urn:sha1:ac7beab527861103dd1e1515d534f87956786554
mbe: Implement `unsafe` attribute rules
This implements `unsafe attr` rules for declarative `macro_rules!` attributes, as specified in [RFC 3697](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3697).
An invocation of an attribute that uses an `unsafe attr` rule requires the `unsafe(attr(...))` syntax.
An invocation of an attribute that uses an ordinary `attr` rule must *not* use the `unsafe(attr(...))` syntax.
`unsafe` is only supported on an `attr` rule, not any other kind of `macro_rules!` rule.
Tracking issue for `macro_rules!` attributes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143547
mbe: Support `unsafe` attribute rules2025-10-01T23:19:39+00:00Josh Triplettjosh@joshtriplett.org2025-09-14T08:17:51+00:00urn:sha1:6bff1abf9d3c171d2380aacb8b4c6f52580192b3improve empty attribute diagnostic2025-09-27T17:32:14+00:00Jana Dönszelmannjana@donsz.nl2025-09-16T18:52:17+00:00urn:sha1:b3631e1174e222bf1dadf1549cfd0f717ebf6d64Rollup merge of #147058 - GuillaumeGomez:ignore-more-ui-tests, r=Kobzol2025-09-26T16:11:15+00:00Matthias Krüger476013+matthiaskrgr@users.noreply.github.com2025-09-26T16:11:15+00:00urn:sha1:a91918f96b55c6f9322b50aba83ab303613da296
Ignore more failing ui tests for GCC backend
Needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146414.
r? ``@Kobzol``
Ignore more failing ui tests for GCC backend2025-09-26T13:33:48+00:00Guillaume Gomezguillaume1.gomez@gmail.com2025-09-26T11:59:06+00:00urn:sha1:a535c7be5444fb6584eecc99f53e6cdb710ff70fport `#[debugger_visualizer]` to the new attribute system2025-09-22T04:30:16+00:00Jana Dönszelmannjana@donsz.nl2025-09-18T05:29:49+00:00urn:sha1:9acc63a48c8206cfe2c2d272600d538983308657Changes to uitests for macro_export port2025-09-21T14:42:47+00:00Jonathan Brouwerjonathantbrouwer@gmail.com2025-09-21T14:21:11+00:00urn:sha1:f7fa83ec626b91c360067e78eae94d9199cf43dc
Co-authored-by: Anne Stijns <anstijns@gmail.com>
Rollup merge of #146389 - jdonszelmann:no-std, r=oli-obk2025-09-13T00:40:44+00:00Jana Dönszelmannjonathan@donsz.nl2025-09-13T00:40:44+00:00urn:sha1:147e97ae68b224f3980ad818b29738c0bc7e4d88
Convert `no_std` and `no_core` to the new attribute infrastructure
r? ```@oli-obk```
Also added a test for these, since we didn't have any and I was kind of surprised new diagnostics didn't break anything hehe
fixup no_{core,std} handling code2025-09-10T18:45:24+00:00Jana Dönszelmannjana@donsz.nl2025-08-24T12:42:44+00:00urn:sha1:dbd3ef1332574ef074c147f3b9e3e74dd29cd7b5allow `#[rustc_align_static(N)]` on `static`s2025-09-09T19:54:54+00:00Folkert de Vriesfolkert@folkertdev.nl2025-06-07T20:56:22+00:00urn:sha1:cbacd00f106778830803ad2e2364518f06ff9078
We need a different attribute than `rustc_align` because unstable attributes are
tied to their feature (we can't have two unstable features use the same
unstable attribute). Otherwise this uses all of the same infrastructure
as `#[rustc_align]`.