diff options
| author | Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de> | 2024-11-21 11:58:41 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-11-21 11:58:41 +0100 |
| commit | df2413ce1c6d2ed235fa90fbc6d8f4c6b459c954 (patch) | |
| tree | bb944666b2fd1ba1d15d82cc108549c3126b8846 | |
| parent | 825985981fd031168d35904c662bcbc6227fc2e5 (diff) | |
| parent | 61a03fa98f8d9c28a08e80dcc4832728e5eb3241 (diff) | |
| download | rust-df2413ce1c6d2ed235fa90fbc6d8f4c6b459c954.tar.gz rust-df2413ce1c6d2ed235fa90fbc6d8f4c6b459c954.zip | |
Rollup merge of #133283 - jieyouxu:triage-relnotes, r=BoxyUwU
Don't exclude relnotes from `needs-triage` label So initially we *didn't* exclude `needs-triage` label, then we did exclude them in #132825 as sometimes the `needs-triage` is redundant. However, I think they are probably worth double-checking because often some of the labels are only accurate/relevant for the *implementation* PR, but not for the purposes of the relnotes tracking issue. Furthermore, sometimes relevant team labels can be removed. So to make it less likely for relnotes to slip through, I think we should still label relnotes-tracking-issues with `needs-triage`. cc https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/241545-t-release/topic/Please.20CC.20lang r? release
| -rw-r--r-- | triagebot.toml | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/triagebot.toml b/triagebot.toml index 2483bfc4a41..b7a9b794c8b 100644 --- a/triagebot.toml +++ b/triagebot.toml @@ -451,7 +451,6 @@ new_issue = true exclude_labels = [ "C-tracking-issue", "A-diagnostics", - "relnotes-tracking-issue", ] [autolabel."WG-trait-system-refactor"] |