Merge pull request #2513 from rust-lang/tshepang/typos

fix some typos

5 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md
index 7f626314f71..c046161e77f 100644
--- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md
+++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ create a `.vim/coc-settings.json`. The settings can be edited with
 [`src/etc/rust_analyzer_settings.json`].
 
 Another way is without a plugin, and creating your own logic in your
-configuration. The following code will work for any checkout of rust-lang/rust (newer than Febuary 2025):
+configuration. The following code will work for any checkout of rust-lang/rust (newer than February 2025):
 
 ```lua
 local function expand_config_variables(option)
diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/hir/ambig-unambig-ty-and-consts.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/hir/ambig-unambig-ty-and-consts.md
index 709027883ae..d4f504ad2a9 100644
--- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/hir/ambig-unambig-ty-and-consts.md
+++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/hir/ambig-unambig-ty-and-consts.md
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Note that places 3 and 4 would never actually be possible to encounter as we alw
 This has a few failure modes:
 - People may write visitors which check for `GenericArg::Infer` but forget to check for `hir::TyKind/ConstArgKind::Infer`, only handling infers in ambig positions by accident.
 - People may write visitors which check for `hir::TyKind/ConstArgKind::Infer` but forget to check for `GenericArg::Infer`, only handling infers in unambig positions by accident.
-- People may write visitors which check for `GenerArg::Type/Const(TyKind/ConstArgKind::Infer)` and `GenerigArg::Infer`, not realising that we never represent inferred types/consts in ambig positions as a `GenericArg::Type/Const`.
+- People may write visitors which check for `GenericArg::Type/Const(TyKind/ConstArgKind::Infer)` and `GenericArg::Infer`, not realising that we never represent inferred types/consts in ambig positions as a `GenericArg::Type/Const`.
 - People may write visitors which check for *only* `TyKind::Infer` and not `ConstArgKind::Infer` forgetting that there are also inferred const arguments (and vice versa).
 
 To make writing HIR visitors less error prone when caring about inferred types/consts we have a relatively complex system:
@@ -60,4 +60,4 @@ This has a number of benefits:
 [ambig_arg]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/hir/enum.AmbigArg.html
 [visit_ty]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/intravisit/trait.Visitor.html#method.visit_ty
 [visit_const_arg]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/intravisit/trait.Visitor.html#method.visit_const_arg
-[visit_infer]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/intravisit/trait.Visitor.html#method.visit_infer
\ No newline at end of file
+[visit_infer]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/intravisit/trait.Visitor.html#method.visit_infer
diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md
index 4f44cf1701c..3ec5ebd799e 100644
--- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md
+++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Internally, [`compiletest`] invokes the supplementary checker script [`htmldocck
 
 Directives to HtmlDocCk are assertions that place constraints on the generated HTML.
 They look similar to those given to `compiletest` in that they take the form of `//@` comments
-but ultimately, they are completey distinct and processed by different programs.
+but ultimately, they are completely distinct and processed by different programs.
 
 [XPath] is used to query parts of the HTML document tree.
 
diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/compiletest.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/compiletest.md
index ded30234e70..aa99347b2bb 100644
--- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/compiletest.md
+++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/compiletest.md
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ on if or how to run the test, what behavior to expect, and more. See
 [directives](directives.md) and the test suite documentation below for more details
 on these annotations.
 
-See the [Adding new tests](adding.md) and [Best practies](best-practices.md)
+See the [Adding new tests](adding.md) and [Best practices](best-practices.md)
 chapters for a tutorial on creating a new test and advice on writing a good
 test, and the [Running tests](running.md) chapter on how to run the test suite.
 
diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/ty_module/instantiating_binders.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/ty_module/instantiating_binders.md
index e3f091ca45f..0d1108c72e0 100644
--- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/ty_module/instantiating_binders.md
+++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/ty_module/instantiating_binders.md
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ This end result is incorrect as we had two separate binders introducing their ow
 
 While in theory we could make this work it would be quite involved and more complex than the current setup, we would have to:
 - "rewrite" bound variables to have a higher `DebruijnIndex` whenever instantiating a `Binder`/`EarlyBinder` with a `Bound` ty/const/region 
-- When inferring an inference variable to a bound var, if that bound var is from a binder enterred after creating the infer var, we would have to lower the `DebruijnIndex` of the var.
+- When inferring an inference variable to a bound var, if that bound var is from a binder entered after creating the infer var, we would have to lower the `DebruijnIndex` of the var.
 - Separately track what binder an inference variable was created inside of, also what the innermost binder it can name parameters from (currently we only have to track the latter)
 - When resolving inference variables rewrite any bound variables according to the current binder depth of the infcx
 - Maybe more (while writing this list items kept getting added so it seems naive to think this is exhaustive)