diff options
| author | Marcel Hellwig <git@cookiesoft.de> | 2019-10-16 13:25:42 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marcel Hellwig <git@cookiesoft.de> | 2019-10-22 10:39:55 +0200 |
| commit | 5572476a36f85959ec820d0886548a747ce0570a (patch) | |
| tree | 386f26fa379a55ad235e95fe8aea8e8dfd5ab270 /clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs | |
| parent | 1d0f62570b2f58b09b991f7312dd1f1564c613f0 (diff) | |
| download | rust-5572476a36f85959ec820d0886548a747ce0570a.tar.gz rust-5572476a36f85959ec820d0886548a747ce0570a.zip | |
Add lint for debug_assert_with_mut_call
This lint will complain when you put a mutable function/method call inside a `debug_assert` macro, because it will not be executed in release mode, therefore it will change the execution flow, which is not wanted.
Diffstat (limited to 'clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs')
| -rw-r--r-- | clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs | 155 |
1 files changed, 155 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs b/clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1184db0587b --- /dev/null +++ b/clippy_lints/src/mutable_debug_assertion.rs @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +use crate::utils::{is_direct_expn_of, span_lint}; +use if_chain::if_chain; +use matches::matches; +use rustc::hir::intravisit::{walk_expr, NestedVisitorMap, Visitor}; +use rustc::hir::{Expr, ExprKind, Mutability, StmtKind, UnOp}; +use rustc::lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintArray, LintPass}; +use rustc::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint, ty}; +use syntax_pos::Span; + +declare_clippy_lint! { + /// **What it does:** Checks for function/method calls with a mutable + /// parameter in `debug_assert!`, `debug_assert_eq!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros. + /// + /// **Why is this bad?** In release builds `debug_assert!` macros are optimized out by the + /// compiler. + /// Therefore mutating something in a `debug_assert!` macro results in different behaviour + /// between a release and debug build. + /// + /// **Known problems:** None + /// + /// **Example:** + /// ```rust,ignore + /// debug_assert_eq!(vec![3].pop(), Some(3)); + /// // or + /// fn take_a_mut_parameter(_: &mut u32) -> bool { unimplemented!() } + /// debug_assert!(take_a_mut_parameter(&mut 5)); + /// ``` + pub DEBUG_ASSERT_WITH_MUT_CALL, + correctness, + "mutable arguments in `debug_assert{,_ne,_eq}!`" +} + +declare_lint_pass!(DebugAssertWithMutCall => [DEBUG_ASSERT_WITH_MUT_CALL]); + +const DEBUG_MACRO_NAMES: [&str; 3] = ["debug_assert", "debug_assert_eq", "debug_assert_ne"]; + +impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for DebugAssertWithMutCall { + fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, e: &'tcx Expr) { + for dmn in &DEBUG_MACRO_NAMES { + if is_direct_expn_of(e.span, dmn).is_some() { + if let Some(span) = extract_call(cx, e) { + span_lint( + cx, + DEBUG_ASSERT_WITH_MUT_CALL, + span, + &format!("do not call a function with mutable arguments inside of `{}!`", dmn), + ); + } + } + } + } +} + +//HACK(hellow554): remove this when #4694 is implemented +#[allow(clippy::cognitive_complexity)] +fn extract_call<'a, 'tcx>(cx: &'a LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, e: &'tcx Expr) -> Option<Span> { + if_chain! { + if let ExprKind::Block(ref block, _) = e.kind; + if block.stmts.len() == 1; + if let StmtKind::Semi(ref matchexpr) = block.stmts[0].kind; + then { + if_chain! { + if let ExprKind::Match(ref ifclause, _, _) = matchexpr.kind; + if let ExprKind::DropTemps(ref droptmp) = ifclause.kind; + if let ExprKind::Unary(UnOp::UnNot, ref condition) = droptmp.kind; + then { + // debug_assert + let mut visitor = MutArgVisitor::new(cx); + visitor.visit_expr(condition); + return visitor.expr_span(); + } else { + // debug_assert_{eq,ne} + if_chain! { + if let ExprKind::Block(ref matchblock, _) = matchexpr.kind; + if let Some(ref matchheader) = matchblock.expr; + if let ExprKind::Match(ref headerexpr, _, _) = matchheader.kind; + if let ExprKind::Tup(ref conditions) = headerexpr.kind; + if conditions.len() == 2; + then { + if let ExprKind::AddrOf(_, ref lhs) = conditions[0].kind { + let mut visitor = MutArgVisitor::new(cx); + visitor.visit_expr(lhs); + if let Some(span) = visitor.expr_span() { + return Some(span); + } + } + if let ExprKind::AddrOf(_, ref rhs) = conditions[1].kind { + let mut visitor = MutArgVisitor::new(cx); + visitor.visit_expr(rhs); + if let Some(span) = visitor.expr_span() { + return Some(span); + } + } + } + } + } + } + } + } + + None +} + +struct MutArgVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { + cx: &'a LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, + expr_span: Option<Span>, + found: bool, +} + +impl<'a, 'tcx> MutArgVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { + fn new(cx: &'a LateContext<'a, 'tcx>) -> Self { + Self { + cx, + expr_span: None, + found: false, + } + } + + fn expr_span(&self) -> Option<Span> { + if self.found { + self.expr_span + } else { + None + } + } +} + +impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for MutArgVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { + fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &'tcx Expr) { + match expr.kind { + ExprKind::AddrOf(Mutability::MutMutable, _) => { + self.found = true; + return; + }, + ExprKind::Path(_) => { + if let Some(adj) = self.cx.tables.adjustments().get(expr.hir_id) { + if adj + .iter() + .any(|a| matches!(a.target.kind, ty::Ref(_, _, Mutability::MutMutable))) + { + self.found = true; + return; + } + } + }, + _ if !self.found => self.expr_span = Some(expr.span), + _ => return, + } + walk_expr(self, expr) + } + + fn nested_visit_map<'this>(&'this mut self) -> NestedVisitorMap<'this, 'tcx> { + NestedVisitorMap::OnlyBodies(&self.cx.tcx.hir()) + } +} |
