diff options
| author | Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com> | 2024-04-22 20:25:59 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-04-22 20:25:59 +0200 |
| commit | 17c28799f31c309a246a00f1374f7efc0801a802 (patch) | |
| tree | f3ab2a911ab3783c532ed2511324d4ebd169c47c /compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src | |
| parent | e984447405f3f4e2b1d3d7ea6f1e802508c61e41 (diff) | |
| parent | 2b6adb06fb8307f19bd42d2fce3ad338dc6112ef (diff) | |
| download | rust-17c28799f31c309a246a00f1374f7efc0801a802.tar.gz rust-17c28799f31c309a246a00f1374f7efc0801a802.zip | |
Rollup merge of #124217 - Zalathar:pre-branch, r=oli-obk
coverage: Prepare for improved branch coverage When trying to rebase my new branch coverage work (including #124154) on top of the introduction of MC/DC coverage (#123409), I found it a lot harder than anticipated. With the benefit of hindsight, the branch coverage code and MC/DC code have become more interdependent than I'm happy with. This PR therefore disentangles them a bit, so that it will be easier for both areas of code to evolve independently without interference. --- This PR also includes a few extra branch coverage tests that I had sitting around from my current branch coverage work. They mostly just demonstrate that certain language constructs listed in #124118 currently don't have branch coverage support. ``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions