diff options
| author | Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de> | 2024-08-06 20:23:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-08-06 20:23:41 +0200 |
| commit | 8912318a4cdf64d8c0186665d54897cb49eb4c8a (patch) | |
| tree | 7955a22309520b4c32bb8c25d9a9e717b5fe26f8 /compiler/rustc_const_eval/src | |
| parent | 4b29f42ffc2104a74a3e6572d36adfe309e45dbd (diff) | |
| parent | fdf3b31165be835879220cfea1cc6a2112452bf6 (diff) | |
| download | rust-8912318a4cdf64d8c0186665d54897cb49eb4c8a.tar.gz rust-8912318a4cdf64d8c0186665d54897cb49eb4c8a.zip | |
Rollup merge of #128720 - y21:issue119620, r=compiler-errors
Pass the right `ParamEnv` to `might_permit_raw_init_strict` Fixes #119620 `might_permit_raw_init_strict` currently passes an empty `ParamEnv` to the `InterpCx`, instead of the actual `ParamEnv` that was passed in to `check_validity_requirement` at callsite. This leads to ICEs such as the linked issue where for `UnsafeCell<*mut T>` we initially get the layout with the right `ParamEnv` (which suceeds because it can prove that `T: Sized` and therefore `UnsafeCell<*mut T>` has a known layout) but then do the rest with an empty `ParamEnv` where `T: Sized` is not known to hold so getting the layout for `*mut T` later fails. This runs into an assertion in other layout code where it's making the (valid) assumption that, when we already have a layout for a struct (`UnsafeCell<*mut T>`), getting the layout of one of its fields (`*mut T`) should also succeed, which wasn't the case here due to using the wrong `ParamEnv`. So, this PR changes it to just use the same `ParamEnv` all the way throughout.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_const_eval/src')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/check_validity_requirement.rs | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/check_validity_requirement.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/check_validity_requirement.rs index 4b6b1e453b8..cbd1fdeea2a 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/check_validity_requirement.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/check_validity_requirement.rs @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ use rustc_middle::bug; use rustc_middle::ty::layout::{LayoutCx, LayoutError, LayoutOf, TyAndLayout, ValidityRequirement}; -use rustc_middle::ty::{ParamEnv, ParamEnvAnd, Ty, TyCtxt}; +use rustc_middle::ty::{ParamEnvAnd, Ty, TyCtxt}; use rustc_target::abi::{Abi, FieldsShape, Scalar, Variants}; use crate::const_eval::{CanAccessMutGlobal, CheckAlignment, CompileTimeMachine}; @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ pub fn check_validity_requirement<'tcx>( return Ok(!layout.abi.is_uninhabited()); } + let layout_cx = LayoutCx { tcx, param_env: param_env_and_ty.param_env }; if kind == ValidityRequirement::Uninit || tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.strict_init_checks { - might_permit_raw_init_strict(layout, tcx, kind) + might_permit_raw_init_strict(layout, &layout_cx, kind) } else { - let layout_cx = LayoutCx { tcx, param_env: param_env_and_ty.param_env }; might_permit_raw_init_lax(layout, &layout_cx, kind) } } @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ pub fn check_validity_requirement<'tcx>( /// details. fn might_permit_raw_init_strict<'tcx>( ty: TyAndLayout<'tcx>, - tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, + cx: &LayoutCx<'tcx, TyCtxt<'tcx>>, kind: ValidityRequirement, ) -> Result<bool, &'tcx LayoutError<'tcx>> { let machine = CompileTimeMachine::new(CanAccessMutGlobal::No, CheckAlignment::Error); - let mut cx = InterpCx::new(tcx, rustc_span::DUMMY_SP, ParamEnv::reveal_all(), machine); + let mut cx = InterpCx::new(cx.tcx, rustc_span::DUMMY_SP, cx.param_env, machine); let allocated = cx .allocate(ty, MemoryKind::Machine(crate::const_eval::MemoryKind::Heap)) |
