diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2022-10-01 10:44:25 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2022-10-01 10:44:25 +0000 |
| commit | 744e397d8855f7da87d70aa8d0bd9e0f5f0b51a1 (patch) | |
| tree | 1721987352b5f0a8548fc46984821d974b661934 /compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs | |
| parent | 277bb6653b55475b5fbce6309e9852fa2100dabe (diff) | |
| parent | b5b3ffe3fc9cfb524a6432ec60a0fc95c514d2e1 (diff) | |
| download | rust-744e397d8855f7da87d70aa8d0bd9e0f5f0b51a1.tar.gz rust-744e397d8855f7da87d70aa8d0bd9e0f5f0b51a1.zip | |
Auto merge of #101986 - WaffleLapkin:move_lint_note_to_the_bottom, r=estebank
Move lint level source explanation to the bottom So, uhhhhh r? `@estebank` ## User-facing change "note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic: ```diff - = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release! = note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678> + = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default ``` Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO. ## Developer-facing change `struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature. Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)` After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion. Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere. ## Subtle problem By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings... I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate. ## P.S. I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs | 26 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs b/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs index 0b207a6c0be..4f495641691 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/upvar.rs @@ -749,10 +749,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { lint::builtin::RUST_2021_INCOMPATIBLE_CLOSURE_CAPTURES, closure_hir_id, closure_head_span, + reasons.migration_message(), |lint| { - let mut diagnostics_builder = lint.build( - &reasons.migration_message(), - ); for NeededMigration { var_hir_id, diagnostics_info } in &need_migrations { // Labels all the usage of the captured variable and why they are responsible // for migration being needed @@ -760,13 +758,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { match &lint_note.captures_info { UpvarMigrationInfo::CapturingPrecise { source_expr: Some(capture_expr_id), var_name: captured_name } => { let cause_span = self.tcx.hir().span(*capture_expr_id); - diagnostics_builder.span_label(cause_span, format!("in Rust 2018, this closure captures all of `{}`, but in Rust 2021, it will only capture `{}`", + lint.span_label(cause_span, format!("in Rust 2018, this closure captures all of `{}`, but in Rust 2021, it will only capture `{}`", self.tcx.hir().name(*var_hir_id), captured_name, )); } UpvarMigrationInfo::CapturingNothing { use_span } => { - diagnostics_builder.span_label(*use_span, format!("in Rust 2018, this causes the closure to capture `{}`, but in Rust 2021, it has no effect", + lint.span_label(*use_span, format!("in Rust 2018, this causes the closure to capture `{}`, but in Rust 2021, it has no effect", self.tcx.hir().name(*var_hir_id), )); } @@ -781,13 +779,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { match &lint_note.captures_info { UpvarMigrationInfo::CapturingPrecise { var_name: captured_name, .. } => { - diagnostics_builder.span_label(drop_location_span, format!("in Rust 2018, `{}` is dropped here, but in Rust 2021, only `{}` will be dropped here as part of the closure", + lint.span_label(drop_location_span, format!("in Rust 2018, `{}` is dropped here, but in Rust 2021, only `{}` will be dropped here as part of the closure", self.tcx.hir().name(*var_hir_id), captured_name, )); } UpvarMigrationInfo::CapturingNothing { use_span: _ } => { - diagnostics_builder.span_label(drop_location_span, format!("in Rust 2018, `{v}` is dropped here along with the closure, but in Rust 2021 `{v}` is not part of the closure", + lint.span_label(drop_location_span, format!("in Rust 2018, `{v}` is dropped here along with the closure, but in Rust 2021 `{v}` is not part of the closure", v = self.tcx.hir().name(*var_hir_id), )); } @@ -800,7 +798,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { match &lint_note.captures_info { UpvarMigrationInfo::CapturingPrecise { var_name: captured_name, .. } => { let var_name = self.tcx.hir().name(*var_hir_id); - diagnostics_builder.span_label(closure_head_span, format!("\ + lint.span_label(closure_head_span, format!("\ in Rust 2018, this closure implements {missing_trait} \ as `{var_name}` implements {missing_trait}, but in Rust 2021, \ this closure will no longer implement {missing_trait} \ @@ -814,7 +812,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { } } } - diagnostics_builder.note("for more information, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2021/disjoint-capture-in-closures.html>"); + lint.note("for more information, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2021/disjoint-capture-in-closures.html>"); let diagnostic_msg = format!( "add a dummy let to cause {} to be fully captured", @@ -857,7 +855,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { // We take the indentation from the next non-empty line. let line2 = lines.find(|line| !line.is_empty()).unwrap_or_default(); let indent = line2.split_once(|c: char| !c.is_whitespace()).unwrap_or_default().0; - diagnostics_builder.span_suggestion( + lint.span_suggestion( closure_body_span.with_lo(closure_body_span.lo() + BytePos::from_usize(line1.len())).shrink_to_lo(), &diagnostic_msg, format!("\n{indent}{migration_string};"), @@ -868,7 +866,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { // braces, but with more than just the opening // brace on the first line. We put the `let` // directly after the `{`. - diagnostics_builder.span_suggestion( + lint.span_suggestion( closure_body_span.with_lo(closure_body_span.lo() + BytePos(1)).shrink_to_lo(), &diagnostic_msg, format!(" {migration_string};"), @@ -877,7 +875,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { } else { // This is a closure without braces around the body. // We add braces to add the `let` before the body. - diagnostics_builder.multipart_suggestion( + lint.multipart_suggestion( &diagnostic_msg, vec