Rollup merge of #146905 - durin42:llvm-22-bitstream-remarks, r=nikic

llvm: update remarks support on LLVM 22

LLVM change dfbd76bda01e removed separate remark support entirely, but
it turns out we can just drop the parameter and everything appears to
work fine.

Fixes rust-lang/rust#146912 as far as I can tell (the test passes.)

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp b/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp
index 414274f24fb..9953f5e1731 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp
+++ b/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp
@@ -1685,6 +1685,14 @@ extern "C" void LLVMRustContextConfigureDiagnosticHandler(
           RemarkStreamer(std::move(RemarkStreamer)),
           LlvmRemarkStreamer(std::move(LlvmRemarkStreamer)) {}
 
+#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(22, 0)
+    ~RustDiagnosticHandler() {
+      if (RemarkStreamer) {
+        RemarkStreamer->releaseSerializer();
+      }
+    }
+#endif
+
     virtual bool handleDiagnostics(const DiagnosticInfo &DI) override {
       // If this diagnostic is one of the optimization remark kinds, we can
       // check if it's enabled before emitting it. This can avoid many
@@ -1779,9 +1787,14 @@ extern "C" void LLVMRustContextConfigureDiagnosticHandler(
     // Do not delete the file after we gather remarks
     RemarkFile->keep();
 
+#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(22, 0)
+    auto RemarkSerializer = remarks::createRemarkSerializer(
+        llvm::remarks::Format::YAML, RemarkFile->os());
+#else
     auto RemarkSerializer = remarks::createRemarkSerializer(
         llvm::remarks::Format::YAML, remarks::SerializerMode::Separate,
         RemarkFile->os());
+#endif
     if (Error E = RemarkSerializer.takeError()) {
       std::string Error = std::string("Cannot create remark serializer: ") +
                           toString(std::move(E));