diff options
| author | Stuart Cook <Zalathar@users.noreply.github.com> | 2025-08-08 12:52:54 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-08-08 12:52:54 +1000 |
| commit | 562222b73765a326fa800a075814deaf627874df (patch) | |
| tree | 194b44c53c8854e040f09f4a2f280d19df5376a6 /compiler/rustc_middle/src | |
| parent | 2edfd3636117db8f57cc49c3a0b786c6245b0617 (diff) | |
| parent | 81ed042c8cc4a1bd677c9209cf9edca6b91af04a (diff) | |
| download | rust-562222b73765a326fa800a075814deaf627874df.tar.gz rust-562222b73765a326fa800a075814deaf627874df.zip | |
Rollup merge of #144999 - Zalathar:remove-mcdc, r=oli-obk
coverage: Remove all unstable support for MC/DC instrumentation Preliminary support for a partial implementation of “Modified Condition/Decision Coverage” instrumentation was added behind the unstable flag `-Zcoverage-options=mcdc` in 2024. These are the most substantial PRs involved: - rust-lang/rust#123409 - rust-lang/rust#126733 At the time, I accepted these PRs with relatively modest scrutiny, because I did not want to stand in the way of independent work on MC/DC instrumentation. My hope was that ongoing work by interested contributors would lead to the code becoming clearer and more maintainable over time. --- However, that MC/DC code has proven itself to be a major burden on overall maintenance of coverage instrumentation, and a major obstacle to other planned improvements, such as internal changes needed for proper support of macro expansion regions. I have also become reluctant to accept any further MC/DC-related changes that would increase this burden. That tension has resulted in an unhappy impasse. On one hand, the present MC/DC implementation is not yet complete, and shows little sign of being complete at an acceptable level of code quality in the foreseeable future. On the other hand, the continued existence of this partial MC/DC implementation is imposing serious maintenance burdens on every other aspect of coverage instrumentation, and is preventing some of the very improvements that would make it easier to accept expanded MC/DC support in the future. While I know this will be disappointing to some, I think the healthy way forward is accept that I made the wrong call in accepting the current implementation, and to remove it entirely from the compiler.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_middle/src')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs | 85 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs | 39 |
2 files changed, 1 insertions, 123 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs index e26575b552e..fd4c64b9a61 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs @@ -50,25 +50,6 @@ rustc_index::newtype_index! { pub struct ExpressionId {} } -rustc_index::newtype_index! { - /// ID of a mcdc condition. Used by llvm to check mcdc coverage. - /// - /// Note for future: the max limit of 0xFFFF is probably too loose. Actually llvm does not - /// support decisions with too many conditions (7 and more at LLVM 18 while may be hundreds at 19) - /// and represents it with `int16_t`. This max value may be changed once we could - /// figure out an accurate limit. - #[derive(HashStable)] - #[encodable] - #[orderable] - #[max = 0xFFFF] - #[debug_format = "ConditionId({})"] - pub struct ConditionId {} -} - -impl ConditionId { - pub const START: Self = Self::from_usize(0); -} - /// Enum that can hold a constant zero value, the ID of an physical coverage /// counter, or the ID of a coverage-counter expression. #[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)] @@ -109,16 +90,6 @@ pub enum CoverageKind { /// During codegen, this might be lowered to `llvm.instrprof.increment` or /// to a no-op, depending on the outcome of counter-creation. VirtualCounter { bcb: BasicCoverageBlock }, - - /// Marks the point in MIR control flow represented by a evaluated condition. - /// - /// This is eventually lowered to instruments updating mcdc temp variables. - CondBitmapUpdate { index: u32, decision_depth: u16 }, - - /// Marks the point in MIR control flow represented by a evaluated decision. - /// - /// This is eventually lowered to `llvm.instrprof.mcdc.tvbitmap.update` in LLVM IR. - TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx: u32, decision_depth: u16 }, } impl Debug for CoverageKind { @@ -128,12 +99,6 @@ impl Debug for CoverageKind { SpanMarker => write!(fmt, "SpanMarker"), BlockMarker { id } => write!(fmt, "BlockMarker({:?})", id.index()), VirtualCounter { bcb } => write!(fmt, "VirtualCounter({bcb:?})"), - CondBitmapUpdate { index, decision_depth } => { - write!(fmt, "CondBitmapUpdate(index={:?}, depth={:?})", index, decision_depth) - } - TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx, decision_depth } => { - write!(fmt, "TestVectorUpdate({:?}, depth={:?})", bitmap_idx, decision_depth) - } } } } @@ -170,14 +135,6 @@ pub enum MappingKind { Code { bcb: BasicCoverageBlock }, /// Associates a branch region with separate counters for true and false. Branch { true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock }, - /// Associates a branch region with separate counters for true and false. - MCDCBranch { - true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, - false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, - mcdc_params: ConditionInfo, - }, - /// Associates a decision region with a bitmap and number of conditions. - MCDCDecision(DecisionInfo), } #[derive(Clone, Debug)] @@ -201,11 +158,6 @@ pub struct FunctionCoverageInfo { pub priority_list: Vec<BasicCoverageBlock>, pub mappings: Vec<Mapping>, - - pub mcdc_bitmap_bits: usize, - /// The depth of the deepest decision is used to know how many - /// temp condbitmaps should be allocated for the function. - pub mcdc_num_condition_bitmaps: usize, } /// Coverage information for a function, recorded during MIR building and @@ -222,10 +174,6 @@ pub struct CoverageInfoHi { /// data structures without having to scan the entire body first. pub num_block_markers: usize, pub branch_spans: Vec<BranchSpan>, - /// Branch spans generated by mcdc. Because of some limits mcdc builder give up generating - /// decisions including them so that they are handled as normal branch spans. - pub mcdc_degraded_branch_spans: Vec<MCDCBranchSpan>, - pub mcdc_spans: Vec<(MCDCDecisionSpan, Vec<MCDCBranchSpan>)>, } #[derive(Clone, Debug)] @@ -236,39 +184,6 @@ pub struct BranchSpan { pub false_marker: BlockMarkerId, } -#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)] -#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)] -pub struct ConditionInfo { - pub condition_id: ConditionId, - pub true_next_id: Option<ConditionId>, - pub false_next_id: Option<ConditionId>, -} - -#[derive(Clone, Debug)] -#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)] -pub struct MCDCBranchSpan { - pub span: Span, - pub condition_info: ConditionInfo, - pub true_marker: BlockMarkerId, - pub false_marker: BlockMarkerId, -} - -#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)] -#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)] -pub struct DecisionInfo { - pub bitmap_idx: u32, - pub num_conditions: u16, -} - -#[derive(Clone, Debug)] -#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable)] -pub struct MCDCDecisionSpan { - pub span: Span, - pub end_markers: Vec<BlockMarkerId>, - pub decision_depth: u16, - pub num_conditions: usize, -} - /// Contains information needed during codegen, obtained by inspecting the /// function's MIR after MIR optimizations. /// diff --git a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs index ed067d49127..84abcf550d2 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs @@ -585,12 +585,7 @@ fn write_coverage_info_hi( coverage_info_hi: &coverage::CoverageInfoHi, w: &mut dyn io::Write, ) -> io::Result<()> { - let coverage::CoverageInfoHi { - num_block_markers: _, - branch_spans, - mcdc_degraded_branch_spans, - mcdc_spans, - } = coverage_info_hi; + let coverage::CoverageInfoHi { num_block_markers: _, branch_spans } = coverage_info_hi; // Only add an extra trailing newline if we printed at least one thing. let mut did_print = false; @@ -603,38 +598,6 @@ fn write_coverage_info_hi( did_print = true; } - for coverage::MCDCBranchSpan { span, true_marker, false_marker, .. } in - mcdc_degraded_branch_spans - { - writeln!( - w, - "{INDENT}coverage branch {{ true: {true_marker:?}, false: {false_marker:?} }} => {span:?}", - )?; - did_print = true; - } - - for ( - coverage::MCDCDecisionSpan { span, end_markers, decision_depth, num_conditions: _ }, - conditions, - ) in mcdc_spans - { - let num_conditions = conditions.len(); - writeln!( - w, - "{INDENT}coverage mcdc decision {{ num_conditions: {num_conditions:?}, end: {end_markers:?}, depth: {decision_depth:?} }} => {span:?}" - )?; - for coverage::MCDCBranchSpan { span, condition_info, true_marker, false_marker } in - conditions - { - writeln!( - w, - "{INDENT}coverage mcdc branch {{ condition_id: {:?}, true: {true_marker:?}, false: {false_marker:?} }} => {span:?}", - condition_info.condition_id - )?; - } - did_print = true; - } - if did_print { writeln!(w)?; } |
