Auto merge of #116688 - compiler-errors:rustfmt-up, r=WaffleLapkin,Nilstrieb

Format all the let-chains in compiler crates

Since rust-lang/rustfmt#5910 has landed, soon we will have support for formatting let-chains (as soon as rustfmt syncs and beta gets bumped).

This PR applies the changes [from master rustfmt to rust-lang/rust eagerly](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/out.20formatting.20of.20prs/near/374997516), so that the next beta bump does not have to deal with a 200+ file diff and can remain concerned with other things like `cfg(bootstrap)` -- #113637 was a pain to land, for example, because of let-else.

I will also add this commit to the ignore list after it has landed.

The commands that were run -- I'm not great at bash-foo, but this applies rustfmt to every compiler crate, and then reverts the two crates that should probably be formatted out-of-tree.
```
~/rustfmt $ ls -1d ~/rust/compiler/* | xargs -I@ cargo run --bin rustfmt -- `@/src/lib.rs` --config-path ~/rust --edition=2021 # format all of the compiler crates
~/rust $ git checkout HEAD -- compiler/rustc_codegen_{gcc,cranelift} # revert changes to cg-gcc and cg-clif
```

cc `@rust-lang/rustfmt`
r? `@WaffleLapkin` or `@Nilstrieb` who said they may be able to review this purely mechanical PR :>

cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` and `@petrochenkov,` who had some thoughts on the order of operations with big formatting changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95262#issue-1178993801. I think the situation has changed since then, given that let-chains support exists on master rustfmt now, and I'm fairly confident that this formatting PR should land even if *bootstrap* rustfmt doesn't yet format let-chains in order to lessen the burden of the next beta bump.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/x86.rs b/compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/x86.rs
index afa1b70efc2..c27f1e6ddda 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/x86.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/x86.rs
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ where
             // - For backwards compatibility, arguments with natural alignment > 4 are still passed
             //   on stack (via `byval`). For example, this includes `double`, `int64_t`,
             //   and structs containing them, provided they lack an explicit alignment attribute.
-            assert!(arg.layout.align.abi >= max_repr_align,
+            assert!(
+                arg.layout.align.abi >= max_repr_align,
                 "abi alignment {:?} less than requested alignment {max_repr_align:?}",
                 arg.layout.align.abi,
             );