Rollup merge of #124918 - nnethercote:FIXME-lcnr, r=lcnr

Eliminate some `FIXME(lcnr)` comments

In some cases this involved changing code. In some cases the comment was able to removed or replaced.

r? ``@lcnr``

3 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs
index e50cb2af4b8..1f079c6f2e1 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs
@@ -3443,8 +3443,6 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         self.dcx().try_steal_replace_and_emit_err(self.tcx.def_span(def_id), StashKey::Cycle, err)
     }
 
-    // FIXME(@lcnr): This function could be changed to trait `TraitRef` directly
-    // instead of using a `Binder`.
     fn report_signature_mismatch_error(
         &self,
         obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
index 4fa2455c42d..3d9d12bbd94 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
@@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
 
         let vtable_base = vtable_trait_first_method_offset(
             tcx,
-            (unnormalized_upcast_trait_ref, ty::Binder::dummy(object_trait_ref)),
+            unnormalized_upcast_trait_ref,
+            ty::Binder::dummy(object_trait_ref),
         );
 
         Ok(ImplSource::Builtin(BuiltinImplSource::Object { vtable_base: vtable_base }, nested))
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs
index 178f3c63ef7..3f1ba80acd3 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs
@@ -320,16 +320,11 @@ fn vtable_entries<'tcx>(
 }
 
 /// Find slot base for trait methods within vtable entries of another trait
-// FIXME(@lcnr): This isn't a query, so why does it take a tuple as its argument.
 pub(super) fn vtable_trait_first_method_offset<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-    key: (
-        ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>, // trait_to_be_found
-        ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>, // trait_owning_vtable
-    ),
+    trait_to_be_found: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
+    trait_owning_vtable: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
 ) -> usize {
-    let (trait_to_be_found, trait_owning_vtable) = key;
-
     // #90177
     let trait_to_be_found_erased = tcx.erase_regions(trait_to_be_found);