diff options
| author | Jacob Pratt <jacob@jhpratt.dev> | 2024-07-03 03:03:14 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-07-03 03:03:14 -0400 |
| commit | b1b9804f5a512ed0fff84437dec53ba273f79a41 (patch) | |
| tree | 9cca9c5520af28fc020b83efd3b1e726bab48b4f /compiler | |
| parent | db592253a673a57ce0d1fa10b74c2a69c0e62bf9 (diff) | |
| parent | ecdaff240da6938473d14f784f8ba9a8c5f3611b (diff) | |
| download | rust-b1b9804f5a512ed0fff84437dec53ba273f79a41.tar.gz rust-b1b9804f5a512ed0fff84437dec53ba273f79a41.zip | |
Rollup merge of #126403 - compiler-errors:better-type-errors, r=lcnr
Actually report normalization-based type errors correctly for alias-relate obligations in new solver We have some special casing to report type mismatch errors that come from projection predicates, but we don't do that for alias-relate obligations. This PR implements that. There's a bit of code duplication, but 🤷 Best reviewed without whitespace. r? lcnr
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs | 149 |
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs index 3e316b78454..17b6dd2bc58 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/type_err_ctxt_ext.rs @@ -1586,60 +1586,113 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { } self.probe(|_| { - let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self); - // try to find the mismatched types to report the error with. // // this can fail if the problem was higher-ranked, in which // cause I have no idea for a good error message. let bound_predicate = predicate.kind(); - let (values, err) = if let ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(data)) = - bound_predicate.skip_binder() - { - let data = self.instantiate_binder_with_fresh_vars( - obligation.cause.span, - infer::BoundRegionConversionTime::HigherRankedType, - bound_predicate.rebind(data), - ); - let unnormalized_term = data.projection_term.to_term(self.tcx); - // FIXME(-Znext-solver): For diagnostic purposes, it would be nice - // to deeply normalize this type. - let normalized_term = - ocx.normalize(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env, unnormalized_term); - - debug!(?obligation.cause, ?obligation.param_env); - - debug!(?normalized_term, data.ty = ?data.term); + let (values, err) = match bound_predicate.skip_binder() { + ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(data)) => { + let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self); + + let data = self.instantiate_binder_with_fresh_vars( + obligation.cause.span, + infer::BoundRegionConversionTime::HigherRankedType, + bound_predicate.rebind(data), + ); + let unnormalized_term = data.projection_term.to_term(self.tcx); + // FIXME(-Znext-solver): For diagnostic purposes, it would be nice + // to deeply normalize this type. + let normalized_term = + ocx.normalize(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env, unnormalized_term); + + let is_normalized_term_expected = !matches!( + obligation.cause.code().peel_derives(), + ObligationCauseCode::WhereClause(..) + | ObligationCauseCode::WhereClauseInExpr(..) + | ObligationCauseCode::Coercion { .. } + ); - let is_normalized_term_expected = !matches!( - obligation.cause.code().peel_derives(), - |ObligationCauseCode::WhereClause(..)| ObligationCauseCode::WhereClauseInExpr( - .. - ) | ObligationCauseCode::Coercion { .. } - ); + let (expected, actual) = if is_normalized_term_expected { + (normalized_term, data.term) + } else { + (data.term, normalized_term) + }; - let (expected, actual) = if is_normalized_term_expected { - (normalized_term, data.term) - } else { - (data.term, normalized_term) - }; + // constrain inference variables a bit more to nested obligations from normalize so + // we can have more helpful errors. + // + // we intentionally drop errors from normalization here, + // since the normalization is just done to improve the error message. + let _ = ocx.select_where_possible(); - // constrain inference variables a bit more to nested obligations from normalize so - // we can have more helpful errors. - // - // we intentionally drop errors from normalization here, - // since the normalization is just done to improve the error message. - let _ = ocx.select_where_possible(); + if let Err(new_err) = + ocx.eq(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env, expected, actual) + { + ( + Some(( + data.projection_term, + is_normalized_term_expected, + self.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_term), + data.term, + )), + new_err, + ) + } else { + (None, error.err) + } + } + ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(lhs, rhs, _) => { + let derive_better_type_error = + |alias_term: ty::AliasTerm<'tcx>, expected_term: ty::Term<'tcx>| { + let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self); + let normalized_term = match expected_term.unpack() { + ty::TermKind::Ty(_) => self.next_ty_var(DUMMY_SP).into(), + ty::TermKind::Const(_) => self.next_const_var(DUMMY_SP).into(), + }; + ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new( + self.tcx, + ObligationCause::dummy(), + obligation.param_env, + ty::PredicateKind::NormalizesTo(ty::NormalizesTo { + alias: alias_term, + term: normalized_term, + }), + )); + let _ = ocx.select_where_possible(); + if let Err(terr) = ocx.eq( + &ObligationCause::dummy(), + obligation.param_env, + expected_term, + normalized_term, + ) { + Some((terr, self.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_term))) + } else { + None + } + }; - if let Err(new_err) = - ocx.eq(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env, expected, actual) - { - (Some((data, is_normalized_term_expected, normalized_term, data.term)), new_err) - } else { - (None, error.err) + if let Some(lhs) = lhs.to_alias_term() + && let Some((better_type_err, expected_term)) = + derive_better_type_error(lhs, rhs) + { + ( + Some((lhs, true, self.resolve_vars_if_possible(expected_term), rhs)), + better_type_err, + ) + } else if let Some(rhs) = rhs.to_alias_term() + && let Some((better_type_err, expected_term)) = + derive_better_type_error(rhs, lhs) + { + ( + Some((rhs, true, self.resolve_vars_if_possible(expected_term), lhs)), + better_type_err, + ) + } else { + (None, error.err) + } } - } else { - (None, error.err) + _ => (None, error.err), }; let msg = values @@ -1737,15 +1790,15 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { fn maybe_detailed_projection_msg( &self, - pred: ty::ProjectionPredicate<'tcx>, + projection_term: ty::AliasTerm<'tcx>, normalized_ty: ty::Term<'tcx>, expected_ty: ty::Term<'tcx>, ) -> Option<String> { - let trait_def_id = pred.projection_term.trait_def_id(self.tcx); - let self_ty = pred.projection_term.self_ty(); + let trait_def_id = projection_term.trait_def_id(self.tcx); + let self_ty = projection_term.self_ty(); with_forced_trimmed_paths! { - if self.tcx.is_lang_item(pred.projection_term.def_id,LangItem::FnOnceOutput) { + if self.tcx.is_lang_item(projection_term.def_id, LangItem::FnOnceOutput) { let fn_kind = self_ty.prefix_string(self.tcx); let item = match self_ty.kind() { ty::FnDef(def, _) => self.tcx.item_name(*def).to_string(), |
