Change pedantically incorrect OnceCell/OnceLock wording

While the semantic intent of a OnceCell/OnceLock is that it can only be written
to once (upon init), the fact of the matter is that both these types offer a
`take(&mut self) -> Option<T>` mechanism that, when successful, resets the cell
to its initial state, thereby technically allowing it to be written to again.

Despite the fact that this can only happen with a mutable reference (generally
only used during the construction of the OnceCell/OnceLock), it would be
incorrect to say that the type itself as a whole categorically prevents being
initialized or written to more than once (since it is possible to imagine an
identical type only without the `take()` method that actually fulfills that
contract).

To clarify, change "that cannot be.." to "that nominally cannot.." and add a
note to OnceCell about what can be done with an `&mut Self` reference.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/library/std/src/sync/once_lock.rs b/library/std/src/sync/once_lock.rs
index fc830bacced..6b9f70da854 100644
--- a/library/std/src/sync/once_lock.rs
+++ b/library/std/src/sync/once_lock.rs
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use crate::mem::MaybeUninit;
 use crate::panic::{RefUnwindSafe, UnwindSafe};
 use crate::sync::Once;
 
-/// A synchronization primitive which can be written to only once.
+/// A synchronization primitive which can nominally be written to only once.
 ///
 /// This type is a thread-safe [`OnceCell`], and can be used in statics.
 ///