Trivial grammar fix in const keyword docs

> `const` items looks remarkably similar to `static` items, [...]

Either this should be written as
> A `const` items looks remarkably similar to a `static` item,

or "looks" should be changed to "look".

I have selected the smaller diff.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/library/std/src/keyword_docs.rs b/library/std/src/keyword_docs.rs
index c82228fca4b..9f4d244b547 100644
--- a/library/std/src/keyword_docs.rs
+++ b/library/std/src/keyword_docs.rs
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ mod break_keyword {}
 /// const WORDS: &str = "hello convenience!";
 /// ```
 ///
-/// `const` items looks remarkably similar to `static` items, which introduces some confusion as
+/// `const` items look remarkably similar to `static` items, which introduces some confusion as
 /// to which one should be used at which times. To put it simply, constants are inlined wherever
 /// they're used, making using them identical to simply replacing the name of the `const` with its
 /// value. Static variables, on the other hand, point to a single location in memory, which all