Revert "implicit `Option`-returning doctests"

This reverts commit 6bb6c001be34d0932a014df981ee18f165c43374.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/src/doc/rustdoc/src/documentation-tests.md b/src/doc/rustdoc/src/documentation-tests.md
index a896ce819ae..c9acd3c307b 100644
--- a/src/doc/rustdoc/src/documentation-tests.md
+++ b/src/doc/rustdoc/src/documentation-tests.md
@@ -253,19 +253,6 @@ conversion, so type inference fails because the type is not unique. Please note
 that you must write the `(())` in one sequence without intermediate whitespace
 so that rustdoc understands you want an implicit `Result`-returning function.
 
-As of version 1.37.0, this simplification also works with `Option`s, which can
-be handy to test e.g. iterators or checked arithmetic, for example:
-
-```ignore
-/// ```
-/// let _ = &[].iter().next()?;
-///# Some(())
-/// ```
-```
-
-Note that the result must be a `Some(())` and this has to be written in one go.
-In this case disambiguating the result isn't required.
-
 ## Documenting macros
 
 Here’s an example of documenting a macro: