Auto merge of #23002 - pnkfelix:fsk-box-place-runway, r=nikomatsakis

Runway for RFC 809 (overloaded box/placement-in) by adding type annotations or explicit calls to `Box::new` where I found it necessary on PR #22086.

I have broken this up into more than one PR because the entire commit chain (see PR #22086) is long, widespread and unwieldy to rebase frequently.

To my knowledge this is not a breaking change.  Also, there is in principle nothing stopping someone from reverting some/all of these annotations, since without the rest of the commit chain in #22086, the associated code would continue to compile.

All I can do is ask: Try to discourage others from removing seemingly "unnecessary" uses of the `Box` type or the `Box::new()` function, until the rest of RFC 809 lands.

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/liballoc/lib.rs b/src/liballoc/lib.rs
index 82bd13475c7..b1fdf139b0c 100644
--- a/src/liballoc/lib.rs
+++ b/src/liballoc/lib.rs
@@ -96,9 +96,15 @@ pub mod heap;
 
 // Primitive types using the heaps above
 
+// Need to conditionally define the mod from `boxed.rs` to avoid
+// duplicating the lang-items when building in test cfg; but also need
+// to allow code to have `use boxed::HEAP;`
+// and `use boxed::Box;` declarations.
 #[cfg(not(test))]
 pub mod boxed;
 #[cfg(test)]
+mod boxed { pub use std::boxed::{Box, HEAP}; }
+#[cfg(test)]
 mod boxed_test;
 pub mod arc;
 pub mod rc;