diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2017-02-11 04:37:27 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2017-02-11 04:37:27 +0000 |
| commit | f140a6c6effa9fe11f97373d995e6c0d977b509f (patch) | |
| tree | 4034fda15457a4b02094cd845786789081dc8b68 /src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp | |
| parent | 064a0ee131b3129fcad68570975ccc85d0fb54d0 (diff) | |
| parent | a344c126d03729a9d147f18dfc9cc6432bc790fd (diff) | |
| download | rust-f140a6c6effa9fe11f97373d995e6c0d977b509f.tar.gz rust-f140a6c6effa9fe11f97373d995e6c0d977b509f.zip | |
Auto merge of #39642 - stjepang:specialize-slice-partialord, r=alexcrichton
Specialize `PartialOrd<A> for [A] where A: Ord`
This way we can call `cmp` instead of `partial_cmp` in the loop, removing some burden of optimizing `Option`s away from the compiler.
PR #39538 introduced a regression where sorting slices suddenly became slower, since `slice1.lt(slice2)` was much slower than `slice1.cmp(slice2) == Less`. This problem is now fixed.
To verify, I benchmarked this simple program:
```rust
fn main() {
let mut v = (0..2_000_000).map(|x| x * x * x * 18913515181).map(|x| vec![x, x ^ 3137831591]).collect::<Vec<_>>();
v.sort();
}
```
Before this PR, it would take 0.95 sec, and now it takes 0.58 sec.
I also tried changing the `is_less` lambda to use `cmp` and `partial_cmp`. Now all three versions (`lt`, `cmp`, `partial_cmp`) are equally performant for sorting slices - all of them take 0.58 sec on the
benchmark.
Tangentially, as soon as we get `default impl`, it might be a good idea to implement a blanket default impl for `lt`, `gt`, `le`, `ge` in terms of `cmp` whenever possible. Today, those four functions by default are only implemented in terms of `partial_cmp`.
r? @alexcrichton
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
