1 files changed, 0 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/nll/ty-outlives/projection-one-region-trait-bound-static-closure.rs b/src/test/ui/nll/ty-outlives/projection-one-region-trait-bound-static-closure.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 7c0a3bc72c3..00000000000
--- a/src/test/ui/nll/ty-outlives/projection-one-region-trait-bound-static-closure.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-// Test cases where we constrain `<T as Anything<'b>>::AssocType` to
-// outlive `'static`. In this case, we don't get any errors, and in fact
-// we don't even propagate constraints from the closures to the callers.
-
-// compile-flags:-Zverbose
-// check-pass
-
-#![allow(warnings)]
-#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
-
-use std::cell::Cell;
-
-trait Anything<'a> {
-    type AssocType: 'static;
-}
-
-fn with_signature<'a, T, F>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T, op: F)
-where
-    F: FnOnce(Cell<&'a ()>, T),
-{
-    op(cell, t)
-}
-
-fn require<'a, 'b, T>(_cell: Cell<&'a ()>, _t: T)
-where
-    T: Anything<'b>,
-    T::AssocType: 'a,
-{
-}
-
-#[rustc_regions]
-fn no_relationships_late<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
-where
-    T: Anything<'b>,
-{
-    with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
-}
-
-#[rustc_regions]
-fn no_relationships_early<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
-where
-    T: Anything<'b>,
-    'a: 'a,
-{
-    with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
-}
-
-#[rustc_regions]
-fn projection_outlives<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
-where
-    T: Anything<'b>,
-    T::AssocType: 'a,
-{
-    // This error is unfortunate. This code ought to type-check: we
-    // are projecting `<T as Anything<'b>>::AssocType`, and we know
-    // that this outlives `'a` because of the where-clause. However,
-    // the way the region checker works, we don't register this
-    // outlives obligation, and hence we get an error: this is because
-    // what we see is a projection like `<T as
-    // Anything<'?0>>::AssocType`, and we don't yet know if `?0` will
-    // equal `'b` or not, so we ignore the where-clause. Obviously we
-    // can do better here with a more involved verification step.
-
-    with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
-}
-
-#[rustc_regions]
-fn elements_outlive<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
-where
-    T: Anything<'b>,
-    'b: 'a,
-{
-    with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
-}
-
-#[rustc_regions]
-fn one_region<'a, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
-where
-    T: Anything<'a>,
-{
-    // Note that in this case the closure still propagates an external
-    // requirement between two variables in its signature, but the
-    // creator maps both those two region variables to `'a` on its
-    // side.
-    with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
-}
-
-fn main() {}