1 files changed, 0 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/unsafe/issue-85435-unsafe-op-in-let-under-unsafe-under-closure.rs b/src/test/ui/unsafe/issue-85435-unsafe-op-in-let-under-unsafe-under-closure.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 72f7b674777..00000000000
--- a/src/test/ui/unsafe/issue-85435-unsafe-op-in-let-under-unsafe-under-closure.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-// check-pass
-// revisions: mir thir
-// [thir]compile-flags: -Z thir-unsafeck
-
-// This is issue #85435. But the real story is reflected in issue #85561, where
-// a bug in the implementation of feature(capture_disjoint_fields) () was
-// exposed to non-feature-gated code by a diagnostic changing PR that removed
-// the gating in one case.
-
-// This test is double-checking that the case of interest continues to work as
-// expected in the *absence* of that feature gate. At the time of this writing,
-// enabling the feature gate will cause this test to fail. We obviously cannot
-// stabilize that feature until it can correctly handle this test.
-
-fn main() {
-    let val: u8 = 5;
-    let u8_ptr: *const u8 = &val;
-    let _closure = || {
-        unsafe {
-            let tmp = *u8_ptr;
-            tmp
-
-            // Just dereferencing and returning directly compiles fine:
-            // *u8_ptr
-        }
-    };
-}