| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
fix ignore header in MSVC test
From `@pietroalbini's` [zulip message](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/better.20compiletest.20ignore.20messages/near/339845864)
> there are tests like `tests/ui/panic-runtime/unwind-tables-target-required.rs` which have `only-x86_64-windows-msvc` which I'm pretty sure is invalid
This test is currently ignored on x64 MSVC CI because of this incorrect target. We'll see if it still passes.
r? `@pietroalbini`
|
|
Revert #107376 to fix potential `bincode` breakage and `rustc-perf` benchmark.
#107376 caused `rustc-perf`'s `webrender` benchmark to break, by regressing on the `bincode-1.3.3` crate.
~~This PR is a draft revert in case we can't land a fix soon enough, and we'd like to land the revert instead~~
(Though I myself think it'd be safer to do the revert, and run crater when relanding #107376.)
cc `@aliemjay`
|
|
Implement checked Shl/Shr at MIR building.
This does not require any special handling by codegen backends,
as the overflow behaviour is entirely determined by the rhs (shift amount).
This allows MIR ConstProp to remove the overflow check for constant shifts.
~There is an existing different behaviour between cg_llvm and cg_clif (cc `@bjorn3).`
I took cg_llvm's one as reference: overflow if `rhs < 0 || rhs > number_of_bits_in_lhs_ty`.~
EDIT: `cg_llvm` and `cg_clif` implement the overflow check differently. This PR uses `cg_llvm`'s implementation based on a `BitAnd` instead of `cg_clif`'s one based on an unsigned comparison.
|
|
Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift
Bunch of bug fixes this time. Also an update to Cranelift 0.93 which adds a brand new optimization pass which cg_clif exposes when using `--release`. And various improvements to cg_clif's test suite, making it faster to run. And finally two small perf improvements.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
|
|
This reverts commit e84e5ff04a647ce28540300244a26ba120642eea, reversing
changes made to 1716932743a7b3705cbf0c34db0c4e070ed1930d.
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108991 (add `enable-warnings` flag for llvm, and disable it by default.)
- #109109 (Use `unused_generic_params` from crate metadata)
- #109111 (Create dirs for build_triple)
- #109136 (Simplify proc macro signature validity check)
- #109150 (Update cargo)
- #109154 (Fix MappingToUnit to support no span of arg_ty)
- #109157 (Remove mw from review rotation for a while)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
sync_cg_clif-2023-03-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patched has been necessary for subtree syncs from the start, but
previously it was necessary to locally install tqc's patched git
version, which hasn't been updated for quite a while. I made a small
change to allow downloading it as script without requiring an entire git
installation for the patched version.
|
|
Remove mw from review rotation for a while
I'm triple booked right now 📚
|
|
Fix MappingToUnit to support no span of arg_ty
Fixes #109152
|
|
Update cargo
14 commits in 7d3033d2e59383fd76193daf9423c3d141972a7d..4a3c588b1f0a8e2dc8dd8789dbf3b6a71b02ed49
2023-03-08 17:05:08 +0000 to 2023-03-14 14:05:36 +0000
- ci: make clean-test-output a script for reuse (rust-lang/cargo#11848)
- Accurately show status when downgrading dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#11839)
- docs(contrib): Move Design Principles earlier in the book (rust-lang/cargo#11842)
- docs(contrib): Point compilation docs to doc comments (rust-lang/cargo#11841)
- `cargo install --git` multiple packages with binaries found hint (rust-lang/cargo#11835)
- Disable flaky auth tests when `gitoxide` runs them (rust-lang/cargo#11830)
- Add some documentation on writing cross-compilation tests (rust-lang/cargo#11825)
- chore: Use sparse protocol on stable CI (rust-lang/cargo#11829)
- Notice for potential unexpected shell expansions in help text of `cargo-add` (rust-lang/cargo#11826)
- Add tracking issue to gitoxide unstable docs (rust-lang/cargo#11822)
- Bump crates-io to 0.36.0 (rust-lang/cargo#11820)
- Bump to 0.71.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#11815)
- docs(contrib): Move overview to lib (rust-lang/cargo#11809)
- Fix semver check for 1.68 (rust-lang/cargo#11817)
r? `@ghost`
|
|
r=oli-obk
Simplify proc macro signature validity check
Use an `ObligationCtxt` instead of `normalize_erasing_regions` + `DeepRejectCtxt`. This should both give us a more accurate error message, and also avoid issues like not-well-formed proc macro signatures. Also, let's fall back on the regular type mismatch error reporting for making these diagnostic notes, instead of hard-coding a bunch of specific diagnostics.
Fixes #109129
|
|
Create dirs for build_triple
Fixes #109103
|
|
Use `unused_generic_params` from crate metadata
Due to the way that `separate_provide_extern` interacted with the implementation of `<ty::InstanceDef<'tcx> as Key>::query_crate_is_local`, we actually never hit the foreign provider for `unused_generic_params`.
Additionally, since the *local* provider of `unused_generic_params` calls `should_polymorphize`, which always returns false if the def-id is foreign, this means that we never actually polymorphize monomorphic instances originating from foreign crates.
We don't actually encode `unused_generic_params` for items where all generics are used, so I had to tweak the foreign provider to fall back to `ty::UnusedGenericParams::new_all_used()` to avoid more ICEs when the above bugs were fixed.
|
|
add `enable-warnings` flag for llvm, and disable it by default.
This flag allows to turn off warnings of llvm compilation for people who are not interested on those warnings.
|
|
r=WaffleLapkin,JakobDegen
Ensure `ptr::read` gets all the same LLVM `load` metadata that dereferencing does
I was looking into `array::IntoIter` optimization, and noticed that it wasn't annotating the loads with `noundef` for simple things like `array::IntoIter<i32, N>`. Trying to narrow it down, it seems that was because `MaybeUninit::assume_init_read` isn't marking the load as initialized (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Mxd8TPTnv>), which is unfortunate since that's basically its reason to exist.
The root cause is that `ptr::read` is currently implemented via the *untyped* `copy_nonoverlapping`, and thus the `load` doesn't get any type-aware metadata: no `noundef`, no `!range`. This PR solves that by lowering `ptr::read(p)` to `copy *p` in MIR, for which the backends already do the right thing.
Fortuitiously, this also improves the IR we give to LLVM for things like `mem::replace`, and fixes a couple of long-standing bugs where `ptr::read` on `Copy` types was worse than `*`ing them.
Zulip conversation: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Move.20array.3A.3AIntoIter.20to.20ManuallyDrop/near/341189936>
cc `@erikdesjardins` `@JakobDegen` `@workingjubilee` `@the8472`
Fixes #106369
Fixes #73258
|
|
Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
|
|
|
|
Encode `opt_rpitit_info` for associated types
Follow-up, only last commit matters
r? `@spastorino`
This needs a perf run after the parent pr lands
|
|
Apparently in CI it's getting generated in the opposite order, one function per file will make the test pass either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove obsolete `givens` from regionck
Fixes #106567
r? `@lcnr` (feel free to reassign)
|
|
14 commits in 7d3033d2e59383fd76193daf9423c3d141972a7d..4a3c588b1f0a8e2dc8dd8789dbf3b6a71b02ed49
2023-03-08 17:05:08 +0000 to 2023-03-14 14:05:36 +0000
- ci: make clean-test-output a script for reuse (rust-lang/cargo#11848)
- Accurately show status when downgrading dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#11839)
- docs(contrib): Move Design Principles earlier in the book (rust-lang/cargo#11842)
- docs(contrib): Point compilation docs to doc comments (rust-lang/cargo#11841)
- `cargo install --git` multiple packages with binaries found hint (rust-lang/cargo#11835)
- Disable flaky auth tests when `gitoxide` runs them (rust-lang/cargo#11830)
- Add some documentation on writing cross-compilation tests (rust-lang/cargo#11825)
- chore: Use sparse protocol on stable CI (rust-lang/cargo#11829)
- Notice for potential unexpected shell expansions in help text of `cargo-add` (rust-lang/cargo#11826)
- Add tracking issue to gitoxide unstable docs (rust-lang/cargo#11822)
- Bump crates-io to 0.36.0 (rust-lang/cargo#11820)
- Bump to 0.71.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#11815)
- docs(contrib): Move overview to lib (rust-lang/cargo#11809)
- Fix semver check for 1.68 (rust-lang/cargo#11817)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108722 (Support for Fuchsia RISC-V target)
- #108880 (Remove tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/new-lowering-strategy in favor of using revisions on existing tests)
- #108909 (Fix object safety checks for new RPITITs)
- #108915 (Remove some direct calls to local_def_id_to_hir_id on diagnostics)
- #108923 (Make fns from other crates with RPITIT work for -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty)
- #109101 (Fall back to old metadata computation when type references errors)
- #109105 (Don't ICE for late-bound consts across `AnonConstBoundary`)
- #109110 (Don't codegen impossible to satisfy impls)
- #109116 (Emit diagnostic when calling methods on the unit type in method chains)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
MaciejWas:add-modifies-receiver-diagn-when-method-not-found, r=petrochenkov
Emit diagnostic when calling methods on the unit type in method chains
Fixes #104204.
What this PR does: If a method is not found somewhere in a call chain, we check if we called earlier a method with signature `(&mut T, ...) -> ()`. If this is the case then we emit a diagnostic message.
For example given input:
```
vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
```
the current output is:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `sort` found for unit type `()` in the current scope
--> hello.rs:3:72
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^ method not found in `()`
```
after this PR it will be:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `sort` found for unit type `()` in the current scope
--> ./hello.rs:3:72
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^ method not found in `()`
|
note: method `sort_by_key` modifies its receiver in-place, it is not meant to be used in method chains.
--> ./hello.rs:3:53
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ this call modifies its receiver in-place
```
|
|
Don't codegen impossible to satisfy impls
Fixes #109098
|
|
Don't ICE for late-bound consts across `AnonConstBoundary`
Fixes #108194
|
|
Fall back to old metadata computation when type references errors
Projection is a bit too aggressive normalizing `<dyn Trait<[type error]> as Pointee>::Metadata` to `[type error]`, rather than to `DynMetadata<..>`. Side-step that by just falling back to the old structural metadata computation.
Fixes #109078
|
|
Make fns from other crates with RPITIT work for -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
Only the last two commits are meaningful.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Remove some direct calls to local_def_id_to_hir_id on diagnostics
Was playing with `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/default-body-with-rpit.rs` and was able to remove some ICEs. Still getting ...
```
error[E0277]: `impl Future<Output = Foo::{opaque#0}>` is not a future
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/default-body-with-rpit.rs:10:28
|
10 | async fn baz(&self) -> impl Debug {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ `impl Future<Output = Foo::{opaque#0}>` is not a future
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = Foo::{opaque#0}>`
= note: impl Future<Output = Foo::{opaque#0}> must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited
note: required by a bound in `Foo::{opaque#1}`
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/default-body-with-rpit.rs:10:28
|
10 | async fn baz(&self) -> impl Debug {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Foo::{opaque#1}`
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `impl Future<Output = Foo::{opaque#0}>` cannot be known at compilation time
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/default-body-with-rpit.rs:10:28
|
10 | async fn baz(&self) -> impl Debug {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
|
= help: the trait `Sized` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = Foo::{opaque#0}>`
note: required by a bound in `Foo::{opaque#1}`
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/default-body-with-rpit.rs:10:28
|
10 | async fn baz(&self) -> impl Debug {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Foo::{opaque#1}`
error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/closure.rs:724:18: async fn generator return type not an inference variable: Foo::{opaque#1}<'_>
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/default-body-with-rpit.rs:10:39
|
10 | async fn baz(&self) -> impl Debug {
| _______________________________________^
11 | | ""
12 | | }
| |_____^
```
But I guess this is a little bit of progress anyway.
This one goes on top of #108700 and #108945
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Fix object safety checks for new RPITITs
This one goes on top of #108869
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Remove tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/new-lowering-strategy in favor of using revisions on existing tests
r? `@compiler-errors`
This one again sits on top of existing approved PRs and it still needs to add revisions to tests in `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait` as it only does so for async in traits.
|
|
Support for Fuchsia RISC-V target
Fuchsia is in the process of implementing the RISC-V support. This change implements the minimal Rust compiler support. The support for building runtime libraries will be implemented in follow up changes once Fuchsia SDK has the RISC-V support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no method is found when checking method call, we check if we called a method with signature (&mut T, ...) -> (). If this is the case then we emit a diagnostic message
|
|
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures
Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly.
This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me).
Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string.
The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see #106191). So I tightened it up in #106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal.
This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`).
This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again.
Fixes #106191
[RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
|
|
Sometimes, we want to create subspans and point at code in the literal
if possible. But this doesn't always make sense, sometimes the literal
may come from macro expanded code and isn't actually there in the
source. Then, we can't really make these suggestions.
This now makes sure that the literal is actually there as we see it so
that we will not run into ICEs on weird literal transformations.
|
|
|
|
Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive
checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was
likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the
spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is
indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly.
This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a
"direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was
imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was
only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not
whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a
source literal, this is not clear to me).
Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which
is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros
expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit
captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source
string.
The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in
certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy
backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work
if it's a direct source literal.
This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source
literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal"
anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned
the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal,
it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the
users of `indoc`).
This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of
"source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc`
invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit
captures again.
[RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
|
|
|
