about summary refs log tree commit diff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2021-08-03Update library/core/src/iter/traits/collect.rsJane Lusby-1/+1
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
2021-06-20Add documentation/example to Extend implSebastian Widua-1/+19
2021-06-14Mention nested unzip in its documentationSebastian Widua-0/+8
2021-06-12Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/rust-lang/rustSebastian Widua-8463/+13642
2021-06-12Auto merge of #82703 - iago-lito:nonzero_add_mul_pow, r=m-ou-sebors-1/+572
Implement nonzero arithmetics for NonZero types. Hello'all, this is my first PR to this repo. Non-zero natural numbers are stable by addition/multiplication/exponentiation, so it makes sense to make this arithmetic possible with `NonZeroU*`. The major pitfall is that overflowing underlying `u*` types possibly lead to underlying `0` values, which break the major invariant of `NonZeroU*`. To accommodate it, only `checked_` and `saturating_` operations are implemented. Other variants allowing wrapped results like `wrapping_` or `overflowing_` are ruled out *de facto*. `impl Add<u*> for NonZeroU* { .. }` was considered, as it panics on overflow which enforces the invariant, but it does not so in release mode. I considered forcing `NonZeroU*::add` to panic in release mode by deferring the check to `u*::checked_add`, but this is less explicit for the user than directly using `NonZeroU*::checked_add`. Following `@Lokathor's` advice on zulip, I have dropped the idea. `@poliorcetics` on Discord also suggested implementing `_sub` operations, but I'd postpone this to another PR if there is a need for it. My opinion is that it could be useful in some cases, but that it makes less sense because non-null natural numbers are not stable by subtraction even in theory, while the overflowing problem is just about technical implementation. One thing I don't like is that the type of the `other` arg differs in every implementation: `_add` methods accept any raw positive integer, `_mul` methods only accept non-zero values otherwise the invariant is also broken, and `_pow` only seems to accept `u32` for a reason I ignore but that seems consistent throughout `std`. Maybe there is a better way to harmonize this? This is it, Iope I haven't forgotten anything and I'll be happy to read your feedback.
2021-06-12Auto merge of #86215 - FabianWolff:unnameable-types, r=jackh726bors-14/+176
Do not suggest to add type annotations for unnameable types Consider this example: ```rust const A = || 42; struct S<T> { t: T } const B: _ = S { t: || 42 }; ``` This currently produces the following output: ``` error: missing type for `const` item --> src/lib.rs:1:7 | 1 | const A = || 42; | ^ help: provide a type for the item: `A: [closure@src/lib.rs:1:11: 1:16]` error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures --> src/lib.rs:4:10 | 4 | const B: _ = S { t: || 42 }; | ^ | | | not allowed in type signatures | help: replace `_` with the correct type: `S<[closure@src/lib.rs:4:21: 4:26]>` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors ``` However, these suggestions are obviously useless, because the suggested types cannot be written down. With my changes, the suggestion is replaced with a note, because there is no simple fix: ``` error: missing type for `const` item --> test.rs:1:7 | 1 | const A = || 42; | ^ | note: however, the inferred type `[closure@test.rs:1:11: 1:16]` cannot be named --> test.rs:1:11 | 1 | const A = || 42; | ^^^^^ error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures --> test.rs:4:10 | 4 | const B: _ = S { t: || 42 }; | ^ not allowed in type signatures | note: however, the inferred type `S<[closure@test.rs:4:21: 4:26]>` cannot be named --> test.rs:4:14 | 4 | const B: _ = S { t: || 42 }; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: aborting due to 2 previous errors ```
2021-06-12Stop relying on #[feature(try_trait)] in doctests.Iago-lito-45/+45
2021-06-12Auto merge of #86130 - BoxyUwU:abstract_const_as_cast, r=oli-obkbors-3/+313
const_eval_checked: Support as casts in abstract consts
2021-06-12Auto merge of #86180 - cjgillot:defmv, r=petrochenkovbors-71/+56
Hash DefId in rustc_span. This is mostly just moving code around. Changes are simplifications of unneeded callbacks from rustc_span to rustc_middle. r? `@petrochenkov`
2021-06-12Auto merge of #86234 - Mark-Simulacrum:new-vers, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-1/+1
Bump to 1.55 r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
2021-06-12Auto merge of #86226 - JohnTitor:rollup-5ubdolf, r=JohnTitorbors-41/+152
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #85800 (Fix some diagnostic issues with const_generics_defaults feature gate) - #85823 (Do not suggest ampmut if rhs is already mutable) - #86153 (Print dummy spans as `no-location`) - #86174 (Detect incorrect vtable alignment during const eval) - #86189 (Make `relate_type_and_mut` public) - #86205 (Run full const-generics test for issue-72293) - #86217 (Remove "generic type" in boxed.rs) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-06-11Bump to 1.54Mark Rousskov-1/+1
2021-06-11Suggest a FnPtr type if a FnDef type is foundFabian Wolff-38/+73
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #86217 - fee1-dead:adjust-box-doc, r=m-ou-seYuki Okushi-1/+1
Remove "generic type" in boxed.rs r? ``@m-ou-se``
2021-06-12Remove "generic type" in boxed.rsDeadbeef-1/+1
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #86205 - JohnTitor:full-test-for-72293, r=oli-obkYuki Okushi-11/+17
Run full const-generics test for issue-72293 Closes #72293 r? ```@oli-obk```
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #86189 - JohnTitor:relate-fn-pub, r=Aaron1011Yuki Okushi-1/+1
Make `relate_type_and_mut` public #85343 improved diagnostics around `Relate` impls but made `relate_type_and_mut` private, which was accessible as `relate` previously. This makes it public so that we can use it on rust-semverver. r? ```@Aaron1011```
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #86174 - lqd:const-ub-align, r=RalfJungYuki Okushi-1/+51
Detect incorrect vtable alignment during const eval This PR fixes #86132 by detecting invalid alignment values for trait objects in the interpreter, and emitting an error about this conversion failure, to avoid the ICE. I've noticed that the error emitted at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a50d72158e08e02cfc051b863017bdbd2c45b637/compiler/rustc_mir/src/interpret/traits.rs#L163-L166 doesn't seem to be present in the const-ub tests, so I've tried adding a test that triggers both of these cases: one for the invalid size, and another for the invalid alignment that #86132 tracks (I have found different magic values triggering different `Align::from_bytes` errors than the "power of 2" one, if need be). However, when doing that, I *cannot* for the life of me figure out the correct incantation to make these 2 errors trigger with the "it is undefined behavior to use this value" message rather than the "any use of this value will cause an error" lint. I've tried Oli's suggestions of different values, tuples and arrays, using the transparent wrapper trick from the other tests and I was only able to trigger the regular const-ub errors about the size of the vtable, or that the drop pointer was invalid. Maybe these "type validation failed" errors happen before this part of the interpreter is reached and there just needs some magic incorrect values to bypass them, I don't know. Since this fixes an ICE, and if the constants are indeed used, these 2 tests will turn into a hard error, I thought I'd open the PR anyways. And if ```@RalfJung``` you know of a way I could manage that (if you think that these tests are worth checking that the `throw_ub_format!` does indeed create const-ub errors as we expect) I'd be grateful. For that reason, r? ```@RalfJung``` and cc ```@oli-obk.```
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #86153 - tmiasko:dummy-span, r=estebankYuki Okushi-9/+9
Print dummy spans as `no-location` Fixes #58808.
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #85823 - fee1-dead:borrowck-0, r=jackh726Yuki Okushi-2/+26
Do not suggest ampmut if rhs is already mutable Removes invalid suggestion in #85765, although it should highlight the user type instead of the local variable. Looking at the comments of this line: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/84b1005bfd22e2cb2a4c13b0b81958fe72628354/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs#L2107 It was intentionally set to `None`, causing it to highlight the local variable instead. I am not sure if I will be able to fix it. Fixes #85765
2021-06-12Rollup merge of #85800 - BoxyUwU:const-param-default-diagnostics, r=oli-obkYuki Okushi-16/+47
Fix some diagnostic issues with const_generics_defaults feature gate This PR makes a few changes: - print out const param defaults in "lifetime ordering" errors rather than discarding them - update `is_simple_text` to account for const params when checking if a type has no generics, this was causing a note to be failed to add to an error message - fixes some diagnostic wording that incorrectly said there was ordering restrictions between type/const params despite the `const_generics_defaults` feature gate is active
2021-06-11Auto merge of #85885 - bjorn3:remove_box_region, r=cjgillotbors-215/+91
Don't use a generator for BoxedResolver The generator is non-trivial and requires unsafe code anyway. Using regular unsafe code without a generator is much easier to follow. Based on #85810 as it touches rustc_interface too.
2021-06-11Make DummyHashStableContext dummier.Camille GILLOT-5/+5
2021-06-11Sprinkle inline.Camille GILLOT-5/+6
2021-06-11Do not suggest to add type annotations for unnameable typesFabian Wolff-13/+140
2021-06-11Auto merge of #86116 - FabianWolff:issue-86100, r=varkorbors-1/+108
Suggest a trailing comma if a 1-tuple is expected and a parenthesized expression is found This pull request fixes #86100. The following code: ```rust fn main() { let t: (i32,) = (1); } ``` currently produces: ``` warning: unnecessary parentheses around assigned value --> test.rs:2:21 | 2 | let t: (i32,) = (1); | ^^^ help: remove these parentheses | = note: `#[warn(unused_parens)]` on by default error[E0308]: mismatched types --> test.rs:2:21 | 2 | let t: (i32,) = (1); | ------ ^^^ expected tuple, found integer | | | expected due to this | = note: expected tuple `(i32,)` found type `{integer}` error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted ``` With my changes, I get the same warning and the following error: ``` error[E0308]: mismatched types --> test.rs:2:21 | 2 | let t: (i32,) = (1); | ------ ^^^ expected tuple, found integer | | | expected due to this | = note: expected tuple `(i32,)` found type `{integer}` help: use a trailing comma to create a tuple with one element | 2 | let t: (i32,) = (1,); | ^^^^ ``` i.e. I have added a suggestion to add a trailing comma to create a 1-tuple. This suggestion is only issued if a 1-tuple is expected and the expression (`(1)` in the example above) is surrounded by parentheses and does not already have a tuple type. In this situation, I'd say that it is pretty likely that the user meant to create a tuple.
2021-06-11Hash DefId in rustc_span.Camille GILLOT-71/+55
2021-06-11Auto merge of #85994 - tmiasko:monomorphic-needs-drop, r=RalfJungbors-1/+43
Disallow non-monomorphic calls to `needs_drop` in interpreter otherwise evaluation could change after further substitutions.
2021-06-11Auto merge of #86204 - alexcrichton:wasm-simd-stable, r=Amanieubors-5/+2
std: Stabilize wasm simd intrinsics This commit performs two changes to stabilize Rust support for WebAssembly simd intrinsics: * The stdarch submodule is updated to pull in rust-lang/stdarch#1179. * The `wasm_target_feature` feature gate requirement for the `simd128` feature has been removed, stabilizing the name `simd128`. This should conclude the FCP started on #74372 and... Closes #74372
2021-06-10std: Stabilize wasm simd intrinsicsAlex Crichton-5/+2
This commit performs two changes to stabilize Rust support for WebAssembly simd intrinsics: * The stdarch submodule is updated to pull in rust-lang/stdarch#1179. * The `wasm_target_feature` feature gate requirement for the `simd128` feature has been removed, stabilizing the name `simd128`. This should conclude the FCP started on #74372 and... Closes #74372
2021-06-11Auto merge of #85961 - 1000teslas:issue-71519-fix, r=petrochenkovbors-1/+82
MVP for using rust-lld as part of cc Will fix #71519. I need to figure out how to write a test showing that lld is used instead of whatever linker cc normally uses. When I manually run rustc using `echo 'fn main() {}' | RUSTC_LOG=rustc_codegen_ssa::back::link=debug ./rustc -Clinker-flavor=gcc-lld --crate-type bin -Clink-arg=-Wl,-v` (thanks to bjorn3 on Zulip), I can see that lld is used, but I'm not sure how to inspect that output in a test.
2021-06-10Auto merge of #85630 - gilescope:to_digit_speedup3, r=nagisabors-16/+21
to_digit simplification (less jumps) I just realised we might be able to make use of the fact that changing case in ascii is easy to help simplify to_digit some more. It looks a bit cleaner and it looks like it's less jumps and there's less instructions in the generated assembly: https://godbolt.org/z/84Erh5dhz The benchmarks don't really tell me much. Maybe a slight improvement on the var radix. Before: ``` test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 53,819 ns/iter (+/- 8,314) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 57,265 ns/iter (+/- 10,730) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 55,077 ns/iter (+/- 5,431) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 56,549 ns/iter (+/- 3,248) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_var ... bench: 43,848 ns/iter (+/- 3,189) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 51,707 ns/iter (+/- 10,946) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 52,835 ns/iter (+/- 2,689) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 51,012 ns/iter (+/- 2,746) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 53,210 ns/iter (+/- 8,645) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_var ... bench: 40,386 ns/iter (+/- 4,711) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 54,088 ns/iter (+/- 5,677) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 55,972 ns/iter (+/- 17,229) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 52,083 ns/iter (+/- 2,425) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 54,132 ns/iter (+/- 1,548) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_var ... bench: 41,250 ns/iter (+/- 5,299) ``` After: ``` test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 48,907 ns/iter (+/- 19,449) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 52,673 ns/iter (+/- 8,122) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 48,509 ns/iter (+/- 2,885) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 50,526 ns/iter (+/- 4,610) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_var ... bench: 38,618 ns/iter (+/- 3,180) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 54,202 ns/iter (+/- 6,994) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 56,585 ns/iter (+/- 8,448) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 50,548 ns/iter (+/- 1,674) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 52,749 ns/iter (+/- 2,576) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_var ... bench: 40,215 ns/iter (+/- 3,327) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 50,233 ns/iter (+/- 22,272) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 50,841 ns/iter (+/- 19,981) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 50,386 ns/iter (+/- 4,555) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 52,369 ns/iter (+/- 2,737) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_var ... bench: 40,417 ns/iter (+/- 2,766) ``` I removed the likely as it resulted in a few less instructions. (It's not been in there long - I added it in the last to_digit iteration).
2021-06-11Run full const-generics test for issue-72293Yuki Okushi-11/+17
2021-06-10Auto merge of #80080 - rylev:qpath-on-struct, r=petrochenkovbors-187/+374
Allow qualified paths in struct construction (both expressions and patterns) Fixes #79658
2021-06-10Further simplification of to_digitGiles Cope-16/+21
2021-06-10Auto merge of #86098 - pietroalbini:test-stable, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-22/+72
Add the x86_64-gnu-stable builder During the 1.52 release process we had to deal with some commits that passed the test suite on the nightly branch but failed on the beta or stable branch. In that case it was due to some UI tests including the channel name in the output, but other changes might also be dependent on the channel. This commit adds a new CI job that runs the Linux x86_64 test suite with the stable branch, ensuring nightly changes also work as stable. To ensure the new job works the following other changes are present: * The `ui-fulldeps/session-derive-errors.rs` test has been disabled on beta and stable, which required adding support for `// ignore-{channel}` and `// only-{channel}`. * The `rustdoc/intra-doc/field.rs` has been fixed. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/release-team/issues/11
2021-06-10Remove unnecessary transmutebjorn3-2/+1
2021-06-10Auto merge of #86020 - nagisa:nagisa/outliner, r=pnkfelixbors-1/+12
Disable the machine outliner by default This addresses a codegen-issue that needs to be fixed upstream in LLVM. While we wait for the fix, we can disable it. Verified manually that the outliner is no longer run when `-Copt-level=z` is specified, and also that you can override this with `-Cllvm-args=-enable-machine-outliner` if you need it anyway. A regression test is not really feasible in this instance, given that we do not have any minimal reproducers. Fixes #85351 cc `@pnkfelix`
2021-06-10support `as _` and add testsEllen-3/+220
2021-06-10Auto merge of #82639 - jyn514:stable-options, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-817/+86
Don't pass -Z unstable-options by default for UI tests Unconditionally passing -Z unstable-options makes it impossible to test whether an option requires unstable-options or not. This uncovered quite a lot of bugs, I'll open issues for each. These don't strictly need to be fixed before this is merged, it just makes the diff much larger because of the changes to diagnostics. - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82636 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82637 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82638
2021-06-10Add support for using qualified paths with structs in expression and patternRyan Levick-187/+374
position.
2021-06-10Auto merge of #85741 - tmiasko:ssa, r=nagisabors-1/+4
Use preorder traversal when checking for SSA locals Traverse blocks in topological sort of dominance partial order, to ensure that local analyzer correctly identifies locals that are already in static single assignment form, while avoiding dependency on implicit numeric order of blocks. When rebuilding the standard library, this change reduces the number of locals that require an alloca from 62452 to 62348.
2021-06-10gcc-lld mvp1000teslas-1/+82
ignore test if rust-lld not found create ld -> rust-lld symlink at build time instead of run time for testing in ci copy instead of symlinking remove linux check test for linker, suggestions from bjorn3 fix overly restrictive lld matcher use -Zgcc-ld flag instead of -Clinker-flavor refactor code adding lld to gcc path revert ci changes suggestions from petrochenkov rename gcc_ld to gcc-ld in dirs
2021-06-10Auto merge of #86186 - JohnTitor:rollup-upaw6wx, r=JohnTitorbors-192/+233
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #82037 (Make symbols stripping work on MacOS X) - #84687 (Multiple improvements to RwLocks) - #85997 (rustdoc: Print a warning if the diff when comparing to old nightlies is empty) - #86051 (Updated code examples and wording in move keyword documentation ) - #86111 (fix off by one in `std::iter::Iterator` documentation) - #86113 (build doctests with lld if use-lld = true) - #86175 (update Miri) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-06-10Make `relate_type_and_mut` publicYuki Okushi-1/+1
2021-06-10Rollup merge of #86175 - RalfJung:miri, r=RalfJungYuki Okushi-9/+15
update Miri We had some nice PRs land today, let's ship those. :) Cc `@rust-lang/miri` r? `@ghost`
2021-06-10Rollup merge of #86113 - the8472:doctest-lld, r=Mark-SimulacrumYuki Okushi-16/+27
build doctests with lld if use-lld = true results when running `./x.py test library/core --doc --stage 0`: ``` # OLD test result: FAILED. 2844 passed; 6 failed; 28 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 21.13s # NEW test result: FAILED. 2844 passed; 6 failed; 28 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 11.92s ```
2021-06-10Rollup merge of #86111 - spookyvision:master, r=JohnTitorYuki Okushi-1/+1
fix off by one in `std::iter::Iterator` documentation the range `(0..10)` is documented as "The even numbers from zero to ten." - should be ".. to nine".
2021-06-10Rollup merge of #86051 - erer1243:update_move_keyword_docs, r=Mark-SimulacrumYuki Okushi-11/+9
Updated code examples and wording in move keyword documentation Had a conversation with someone on the Rust Discord who was confused by the move keyword documentation. Some of the wording is odd sounding ("owned by value" - what else can something be owned by?). Also, some of the examples used Copy types when demonstrating move, leading to variables still being accessible in the outer scope after the move, contradicting the examples' comments. I changed the move keyword documentation a bit, removing that odd wording and changing all the examples to use non-Copy types
2021-06-10Rollup merge of #85997 - jyn514:rustdoc-diff, r=Mark-SimulacrumYuki Okushi-9/+21
rustdoc: Print a warning if the diff when comparing to old nightlies is empty This avoids confusing situations where it's unclear whether there's a bug in the diff tool or not: ``` 26: `@has` check failed `XPATH PATTERN` did not match // `@has` - '//code/a[`@href="{{channel}}/std/primitive.i32.html"]'` 'i32' Encountered 6 errors ------------------------------------------ info: generating a diff against nightly rustdoc failures: [rustdoc] rustdoc/primitive-reexport.rs ```