| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Stabilise inline_const
# Stabilisation Report
## Summary
This PR will stabilise `inline_const` feature in expression position. `inline_const_pat` is still unstable and will *not* be stabilised.
The feature will allow code like this:
```rust
foo(const { 1 + 1 })
```
which is roughly desugared into
```rust
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
const FOO: i32 = 1 + 1;
}
foo(Foo::FOO)
```
This feature is from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2920 and is tracked in #76001 (the tracking issue should *not* be closed as it needs to track inline const in pattern position). The initial implementation is done in #77124.
## Difference from RFC
There are two major differences (enhancements) as implemented from the RFC. First thing is that the RFC says that the type of an inline const block inferred from the content *within* it, but we currently can infer the type using the information from outside the const block as well. This is a frequently requested feature to the initial implementation (e.g. #89964). The inference is implemented in #89561 and is done by treating inline const similar to a closure and therefore share inference context with its parent body.
This allows code like:
```rust
let v: Vec<i32> = const { Vec::new() };
```
Another enhancement that differs from the RFC is that we currently allow inline consts to reference generic parameters. This is implemented in #96557.
This allows code like:
```rust
fn create_none_array<T, const N: usize>() -> [Option<T>; N] {
[const { None::<T> }; N]
}
```
This enhancement also makes inline const usable as static asserts:
```rust
fn require_zst<T>() {
const { assert!(std::mem::size_of::<T>() == 0) }
}
```
## Documentation
Reference: rust-lang/reference#1295
## Unresolved issues
We still have a few issues that are not resolved, but I don't think it necessarily has to block stabilisation:
* expr fragment specifier issue: #86730
* ~~`const {}` behaves similar to `async {}` but not to `{}` and `unsafe {}` (they are treated as `ExpressionWithoutBlock` rather than `ExpressionWithBlock`): https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/const.20blocks.20differ.20from.20normal.20and.20from.20unsafe.20blocks/near/290229453~~
## Tests
There are a few tests in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/ui/inline-const
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
delegation: Support renaming, and async, const, extern "ABI" and C-variadic functions
Also allow delegating to functions with opaque types (`impl Trait`).
The delegation item will refer to the original opaque type from the callee, fresh opaque type won't be created, which seems like a reasonable behavior.
(Such delegation items will cause query cycles when used in trait impls, but it can be fixed later.)
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118212.
|
|
Require explicitly marking closures as coroutines
instead of relying on patching up the closure to be a coroutine if it happens to contain a `yield` expression.
I only do this in the 2024 edition, as the `gen` keyword is only available there.
|
|
And suggest adding the `#[coroutine]` to the closure
|
|
`yield` expressions
|
|
CI: dynamic jobs
This PR modifies our CI workflows to be dynamic. This means that when a GitHub event is generated, we will run a Python script (`calculate-job-matrix.py`), which decides which CI jobs should be generated. These jobs are defined in `src/ci/github-actions/jobs.yml`).
This should provide a few benefits:
- Once the migration to dynamic jobs is complete, we shouldn't need `expand-yaml-anchors` anymore.
- The job table on PRs (and also the left job column on auto/try builds) should be much cleaner and contain only the jobs that are actually relevant/executed.
- It should be much easier to support dynamic try builds, i.e. to run an arbitrary CI job on a try build.
See [this Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/job.20matrix.20re-ordered.20PR.20list) for more context.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
Stop using LLVM struct types for alloca
The alloca type has no semantic meaning, only the size (and alignment, but we specify it explicitly) matter. Using `[N x i8]` is a more direct way to specify that we want `N` bytes, and avoids relying on LLVM's struct layout. It is likely that a future LLVM version will change to an untyped alloca representation.
Split out from #121577.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
Update cargo
7 commits in 80d5b607dde6ef97dfff4e23923822c01d2bb036..c9392675917adc2edab269eea27c222b5359c637
2024-04-19 18:39:22 +0000 to 2024-04-23 19:35:19 +0000
- fix(install): Don't respect MSRV for non-local installs (rust-lang/cargo#13790)
- gate some libc usages under cfg(unix), drop os_info features (rust-lang/cargo#13782)
- feat(resolver): Add default Edition2024 to resolver v3 (rust-lang/cargo#13785)
- Fix 2 tests for offline execution (rust-lang/cargo#13789)
- fix(toml): Report `_` fied variants (e.g. `dev_dependencies`) as deprecated (rust-lang/cargo#13783)
- feat(resolver): Add v3 resolver for MSRV-aware resolving (rust-lang/cargo#13776)
- Unused dependencies cleanup (rust-lang/cargo#13778)
r? ghost
|
|
|
|
restrict promotion of `const fn` calls
We only promote them in `const`/`static` initializers, but even that is still unfortunate -- we still cannot add promoteds to required_consts. But we should add them there to make sure it's always okay to evaluate every const we encounter in a MIR body. That effort of not promoting things that can fail to evaluate is tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80619. These `const fn` calls are the last missing piece.
So I propose that we do not promote const-fn calls in const when that may fail without the entire const failing, thereby completing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80619. Unfortunately we can't just reject promoting these functions outright due to backwards compatibility. So let's see if we can find a hack that makes crater happy...
For the record, this is the [crater analysis](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80243#issuecomment-751885520) from when I tried to entirely forbid this kind of promotion. It's a tiny amount of breakage and if we had a nice alternative for code like that, we could conceivably push it through... but sadly, inline const expressions are still blocked on t-lang concerns about post-monomorphization errors and we haven't yet figured out an implementation that can resolve those concerns. So we're forced to make progress via other means, such as terrible hacks like this.
Attempt one: only promote calls on the "safe path" at the beginning of a MIR block. This is the path that starts at the start block and continues via gotos and calls, but stops at the first branch. If we had imposed this restriction before stabilizing `if` and `match` in `const`, this would have definitely been sufficient...
EDIT: Turns out that works. :)
**Here's the t-lang [nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121557#issuecomment-1990902440).** And here's the [FCP comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121557#issuecomment-2010306165).
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
then we can also make all_required_consts_are_checked a constant instead of a function
|
|
|
|
|
|
the entire const failing
|
|
Enable `CrateNum` query feeding via `TyCtxt`
Instead of having a magic function that violates some `TyCtxtFeed` invariants, add a `create_def` equivalent for `CrateNum`s.
Note that this still isn't tracked by the query system (unlike `create_def`), and that feeding most `CrateNum` queries for crates other than the local one will likely cause performance regressions.
These things should be attempted on their own separately, but this PR should stand on its own
|
|
Also allow `impl Trait` in delegated functions.
The delegation item will refer to the original opaque type from the callee, fresh opaque type won't be created.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #124003 (Dellvmize some intrinsics (use `u32` instead of `Self` in some integer intrinsics))
- #124169 (Don't fatal when calling `expect_one_of` when recovering arg in `parse_seq`)
- #124286 (Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
This fixes a crash when compiling the standard library. In addition the Cranelift update fixes all the 128bit int abi incompatibility between cg_clif and cg_llvm.
r? ``@ghost``
``@rustbot`` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
|
|
Don't fatal when calling `expect_one_of` when recovering arg in `parse_seq`
In `parse_seq`, when parsing a sequence of token-separated items, if we don't see a separator, we try to parse another item eagerly in order to give a good diagnostic and recover from a missing separator:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d1a0fa5ed3ffe52d72f761d3c95cbeb0a9cdfe66/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs#L900-L901
If parsing the item itself calls `expect_one_of`, then we will fatal because of #58903:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d1a0fa5ed3ffe52d72f761d3c95cbeb0a9cdfe66/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs#L513-L516
For `precise_capturing` feature I implemented, we do end up calling `expected_one_of`:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d1a0fa5ed3ffe52d72f761d3c95cbeb0a9cdfe66/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/ty.rs#L712-L714
This leads the compiler to fatal *before* having emitted the first error, leading to absolutely no useful information for the user about what happened in the parser.
This PR makes it so that we stop doing that.
Fixes #124195
|
|
Dellvmize some intrinsics (use `u32` instead of `Self` in some integer intrinsics)
This implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/693 minus what was implemented in #123226.
Note: I decided to _not_ change `shl`/... builder methods, as it just doesn't seem worth it.
r? ``@scottmcm``
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120929 (Wrap dyn type with parentheses in suggestion)
- #122591 (Suggest using type args directly instead of equality constraint)
- #122598 (deref patterns: lower deref patterns to MIR)
- #123048 (alloc::Layout: explicitly document size invariant on the type level)
- #123993 (Do `check_coroutine_obligations` once per typeck root)
- #124218 (Allow nesting subdiagnostics in #[derive(Subdiagnostic)])
- #124285 (Mark ``@RUSTC_BUILTIN`` search path usage as unstable)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Mark `@RUSTC_BUILTIN` search path usage as unstable
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121843
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Allow nesting subdiagnostics in #[derive(Subdiagnostic)]
|
|
Do `check_coroutine_obligations` once per typeck root
We only need to do `check_coroutine_obligations` once per typeck root, especially since the new solver can't really (easily) associate which obligations correspond to which coroutines.
This requires us to move the checks for sized coroutine fields into `mir_coroutine_witnesses`, but that's fine imo.
r? lcnr
|
|
alloc::Layout: explicitly document size invariant on the type level
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95295 added this to the constructor, but it seems worth documenting the type invariant at the type level.
|
|
deref patterns: lower deref patterns to MIR
This lowers deref patterns to MIR. This is a bit tricky because this is the first kind of pattern that requires storing a value in a temporary. Thanks to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123324 false edges are no longer a problem.
The thing I'm not confident about is the handling of fake borrows. This PR ignores any fake borrows inside a deref pattern. We are guaranteed to at least fake borrow the place of the first pointer value, which could be enough, but I'm not certain.
|
|
Suggest using type args directly instead of equality constraint
When type arguments are written erroneously using an equality constraint we suggest specifying them directly without the equality constraint.
Fixes #122162
Changes the diagnostic in the issue from:
```rust
error[E0229]: associated type bindings are not allowed here
9 | impl std::cmp::PartialEq<Rhs = T> for S {
| ^^^^^^^ associated type not allowed here
|
```
to
```rust
error[E0229]: associated type bindings are not allowed here
9 | impl std::cmp::PartialEq<Rhs = T> for S {
| ^^^^^^^ associated type not allowed here
|
help: to use `T` as a generic argument specify it directly
|
| impl std::cmp::PartialEq<T> for S {
| ~
```
|
|
Wrap dyn type with parentheses in suggestion
Close #120223
Fix wrong suggestion that is grammatically incorrect.
Specifically, I added parentheses to dyn types that need lifetime bound.
```
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound
|
4 | executor: impl FnOnce(T) -> (dyn Future<Output = ()>) + 'static,
| + +++++++++++
```
|
|
|
|
Use fulfillment in method probe, not evaluation
This PR reworks method probing to use fulfillment instead of a `for`-loop of `evaluate_predicate` calls, and moves normalization from method candidate assembly into the `consider_probe`, where it's applied to *all* candidates. This last part coincidentally fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121643#issuecomment-1975371248.
Regarding *why* this large rewrite is done: In general, it's an anti-pattern to do `for o in obligations { evaluate(o); }` because it's not compatible with the way that the new solver emits alias-relate obligations which constrain variables that may show up in other predicates.
r? lcnr
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123050 (panic_str only exists for the migration to 2021 panic macros)
- #124067 (weak lang items are not allowed to be #[track_caller])
- #124099 (Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions)
- #124284 (parser: remove unused(no reads) max_angle_bracket_count field)
- #124288 (remove `push_trait_bound_inner`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
remove `push_trait_bound_inner`
Don't see a use for it.
|
|
parser: remove unused(no reads) max_angle_bracket_count field
Isn't there (clippy) lint for variables with only writes? They should be marked as dead too, probably.
Found only https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/collection_is_never_read
|
|
Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions
This implements the suggestion in [#15701](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701#issuecomment-2033124217) to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of `stmt_expr_attributes`.
|
|
weak lang items are not allowed to be #[track_caller]
For instance the panic handler will be called via this import
```rust
extern "Rust" {
#[lang = "panic_impl"]
fn panic_impl(pi: &PanicInfo<'_>) -> !;
}
```
A `#[track_caller]` would add an extra argument and thus make this the wrong signature.
The 2nd commit is a consistency rename; based on the docs [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/unstable-book/language-features/lang-items.html) and [here](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/lang-items.html) I figured "lang item" is more widely used. (In the compiler output, "lang item" and "language item" seem to be pretty even.)
|
|
panic_str only exists for the migration to 2021 panic macros
The only caller is `expect_failed`, which is already a cold inline(never) function, so inlining into that function should be fine. (And indeed `panic_str` was `#[inline]` anyway.)
The existence of panic_str risks someone calling it when they should call `panic` instead, and I can't see a reason why this footgun should exist.
I also extended the comment in `panic` to explain why it needs a `'static` string -- I know I've wondered about this in the past and it took me quite a while to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sync_cg_clif-2024-04-23
|
|
|
|
|
