| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
* Do not emit unnecessary E0308 after E0070
* Show fewer errors on `while let` missing `let`
* Hide redundant E0308 on `while let` missing `let`
* Point at binding definition when possible on invalid assignment
* do not point at closure twice
* do not suggest `if let` for literals in lhs
* account for parameter types
|
|
|
|
Don't mark for loop iter expression as desugared
We typically don't mark spans of lowered things as desugared. This helps Clippy rightly discern when code is (not) from expansion. This was discovered by ``@flip1995`` at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7789#issuecomment-939289501.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encode spans relative to the enclosing item
The aim of this PR is to avoid recomputing queries when code is moved without modification.
MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/443
This is achieved by :
1. storing the HIR owner LocalDefId information inside the span;
2. encoding and decoding spans relative to the enclosing item in the incremental on-disk cache;
3. marking a dependency to the `source_span(LocalDefId)` query when we translate a span from the short (`Span`) representation to its explicit (`SpanData`) representation.
Since all client code uses `Span`, step 3 ensures that all manipulations
of span byte positions actually create the dependency edge between
the caller and the `source_span(LocalDefId)`.
This query return the actual absolute span of the parent item.
As a consequence, any source code motion that changes the absolute byte position of a node will either:
- modify the distance to the parent's beginning, so change the relative span's hash;
- dirty `source_span`, and trigger the incremental recomputation of all code that
depends on the span's absolute byte position.
With this scheme, I believe the dependency tracking to be accurate.
For the moment, the spans are marked during lowering.
I'd rather do this during def-collection,
but the AST MutVisitor is not practical enough just yet.
The only difference is that we attach macro-expanded spans
to their expansion point instead of the macro itself.
|
|
|
|
r=nagisa
rustc: use more correct span data in for loop desugaring
Fixes #82462
Before:
help: consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped
|
LL | for x in DroppingSlice(&*v).iter(); {
| +
After:
help: consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped
|
LL | };
| +
This seems like a reasonable fix: since the desugared "expr_drop_temps_mut" contains the entire desugared loop construct, its span should contain the entire loop construct as well.
|
|
We only do this operation when incremental compilation is enabled. This
avoids pessimizing the span handling for non-incremental compilation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before:
help: consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped
|
LL | for x in DroppingSlice(&*v).iter(); {
| +
After:
help: consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped
|
LL | };
| +
This seems like a reasonable fix: since the desugared "expr_drop_temps_mut"
contains the entire desugared loop construct, its span should contain the
entire loop construct as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd updated the ones inside the method, but not its doc comment.
|
|
position.
|
|
Implement the new desugaring from `try_trait_v2`
~~Currently blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84782, which has a PR in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84811~~ Rebased atop that fix.
`try_trait_v2` tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277
Unfortunately this is already touching a ton of things, so if you have suggestions for good ways to split it up, I'd be happy to hear them. (The combination between the use in the library, the compiler changes, the corresponding diagnostic differences, even MIR tests mean that I don't really have a great plan for it other than trying to have decently-readable commits.
r? `@ghost`
~~(This probably shouldn't go in during the last week before the fork anyway.)~~ Fork happened.
|
|
On x86, the default syntax is also switched to Intel to match asm!
|
|
It had no callers which didn't immediately call `raise()`, and this
unifies the behavior with `Session`.
|
|
Including all the bootstrapping tweaks in the library.
|
|
|
|
Use AnonConst for asm! constants
This replaces the old system which used explicit promotion. See #83169 for more background.
The syntax for `const` operands is still the same as before: `const <expr>`.
Fixes #83169
Because the implementation is heavily based on inline consts, we suffer from the same issues:
- We lose the ability to use expressions derived from generics. See the deleted tests in `src/test/ui/asm/const.rs`.
- We are hitting the same ICEs as inline consts, for example #78174. It is unlikely that we will be able to stabilize this before inline consts are stabilized.
|
|
|
|
Previously registers could only be marked as clobbered if the target feature for that register was enabled. This restriction is now removed.
|
|
ast/hir: Rename field-related structures
I always forget what `ast::Field` and `ast::StructField` mean despite working with AST for long time, so this PR changes the naming to less confusing and more consistent.
- `StructField` -> `FieldDef` ("field definition")
- `Field` -> `ExprField` ("expression field", not "field expression")
- `FieldPat` -> `PatField` ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Various visiting and other methods working with the fields are renamed correspondingly too.
The second commit reduces the size of `ExprKind` by boxing fields of `ExprKind::Struct` in preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80080.
|
|
|
|
StructField -> FieldDef ("field definition")
Field -> ExprField ("expression field", not "field expression")
FieldPat -> PatField ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Also rename visiting and other methods working on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially address #82827.
|
|
Add #[rustc_legacy_const_generics]
This is the first step towards removing `#[rustc_args_required_const]`: a new attribute is added which rewrites function calls of the form `func(a, b, c)` to `func::<{b}>(a, c)`. This allows previously stabilized functions in `stdarch` which use `rustc_args_required_const` to use const generics instead.
This new attribute is not intended to ever be stabilized, it is only intended for use in `stdarch` as a replacement for `#[rustc_args_required_const]`.
```rust
#[rustc_legacy_const_generics(1)]
pub fn foo<const Y: usize>(x: usize, z: usize) -> [usize; 3] {
[x, Y, z]
}
fn main() {
assert_eq!(foo(0 + 0, 1 + 1, 2 + 2), [0, 2, 4]);
assert_eq!(foo::<{1 + 1}>(0 + 0, 2 + 2), [0, 2, 4]);
}
```
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #82290, fix #82250.
|
|
This renames the variants in HIR UnOp from
enum UnOp {
UnDeref,
UnNot,
UnNeg,
}
to
enum UnOp {
Deref,
Not,
Neg,
}
Motivations:
- This is more consistent with the rest of the code base where most enum
variants don't have a prefix.
- These variants are never used without the `UnOp` prefix so the extra
`Un` prefix doesn't help with readability. E.g. we don't have any
`UnDeref`s in the code, we only have `UnOp::UnDeref`.
- MIR `UnOp` type variants don't have a prefix so this is more
consistent with MIR types.
- "un" prefix reads like "inverse" or "reverse", so as a beginner in
rustc code base when I see "UnDeref" what comes to my mind is
something like "&*" instead of just "*".
|
|
Lower closure prototype after its body.
Fixes #79537.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
|
|
|
