| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=jdonszelmann
Check if merged attributes list is empty in expr
Fixes #139373
In the example code, an [`UnrecognizedReprHint`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b5ccfc87f59ab017032e430d4d358b4989735da/compiler/rustc_attr_parsing/src/attributes/repr.rs#L155) error is output, and the list of merged attributes becomes empty. This causes a [panic](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b5ccfc87f59ab017032e430d4d358b4989735da/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs#L618) to occur. So, it's necessary to check if merged attributes list is empty as other functions do.
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b5ccfc87f59ab017032e430d4d358b4989735da/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs#L896
|
|
|
|
In the AST, currently we use `BinOpKind` within `ExprKind::AssignOp` and
`AssocOp::AssignOp`, even though this allows some nonsensical
combinations. E.g. there is no `&&=` operator. Likewise for HIR and
THIR.
This commit introduces `AssignOpKind` which only includes the ten
assignable operators, and uses it in `ExprKind::AssignOp` and
`AssocOp::AssignOp`. (And does similar things for `hir::ExprKind` and
`thir::ExprKind`.) This avoids the possibility of nonsensical
combinations, as seen by the removal of the `bug!` case in
`lang_item_for_binop`.
The commit is mostly plumbing, including:
- Adds an `impl From<AssignOpKind> for BinOpKind` (AST) and `impl
From<AssignOp> for BinOp` (MIR/THIR).
- `BinOpCategory` can now be created from both `BinOpKind` and
`AssignOpKind`.
- Replaces the `IsAssign` type with `Op`, which has more information and
a few methods.
- `suggest_swapping_lhs_and_rhs`: moves the condition to the call site,
it's easier that way.
- `check_expr_inner`: had to factor out some code into a separate
method.
I'm on the fence about whether avoiding the nonsensical combinations is
worth the extra code.
|
|
Reduce FormattingOptions to 64 bits
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This reduces FormattingOptions from 6-7 machine words (384 bits on 64-bit platforms, 224 bits on 32-bit platforms) to just 64 bits (a single register on 64-bit platforms).
Before:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
flags: u32, // only 6 bits used
fill: char,
align: Option<Alignment>,
width: Option<usize>,
precision: Option<usize>,
}
```
After:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
/// Bits:
/// - 0-20: fill character (21 bits, a full `char`)
/// - 21: `+` flag
/// - 22: `-` flag
/// - 23: `#` flag
/// - 24: `0` flag
/// - 25: `x?` flag
/// - 26: `X?` flag
/// - 27: Width flag (if set, the width field below is used)
/// - 28: Precision flag (if set, the precision field below is used)
/// - 29-30: Alignment (0: Left, 1: Right, 2: Center, 3: Unknown)
/// - 31: Always set to 1
flags: u32,
/// Width if width flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
width: u16,
/// Precision if precision flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
precision: u16,
}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce `kw::Empty` usage, part 1
This PR fixes some confusing `kw::Empty` usage, fixing a crash test along the way.
r? ```@spastorino```
|
|
Ergonomic ref counting
This is an experimental first version of ergonomic ref counting.
This first version implements most of the RFC but doesn't implement any of the optimizations. This was left for following iterations.
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3680
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132290
Project goal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/107
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
|
|
It's clearer than using `kw::Empty` to mean `None`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconditionally lower match arm even if it's unneeded for never pattern in match
fixes #137708
Lowering arm body is skipped when lowering match arm with never pattern, but we may need the HirId for DefId in the body in later passes. And then we got the ICE `No HirId for DefId`.
Fixes this by lowering the arm body even if it's unneeded for never pattern in match, so that we can generate HirId and use it then.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
fixup docs in parser
|
|
|
|
|
|
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`
This is continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132282 .
I'm pretty sure I did everything right. In particular, I searched all occurrences of `Lrc` in submodules and made sure that they don't need replacement.
There are other possibilities, through.
We can define `enum Lrc<T> { Rc(Rc<T>), Arc(Arc<T>) }`. Or we can make `Lrc` a union and on every clone we can read from special thread-local variable. Or we can add a generic parameter to `Lrc` and, yes, this parameter will be everywhere across all codebase.
So, if you think we should take some alternative approach, then don't merge this PR. But if it is decided to stick with `Arc`, then, please, merge.
cc "Parallel Rustc Front-end" ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113349 )
r? SparrowLii
`@rustbot` label WG-compiler-parallel
|
|
#[contracts::requires(...)] + #[contracts::ensures(...)]
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128044
Updated contract support: attribute syntax for preconditions and postconditions, implemented via a series of desugarings that culminates in:
1. a compile-time flag (`-Z contract-checks`) that, similar to `-Z ub-checks`, attempts to ensure that the decision of enabling/disabling contract checks is delayed until the end user program is compiled,
2. invocations of lang-items that handle invoking the precondition, building a checker for the post-condition, and invoking that post-condition checker at the return sites for the function, and
3. intrinsics for the actual evaluation of pre- and post-condition predicates that third-party verification tools can intercept and reinterpret for their own purposes (e.g. creating shims of behavior that abstract away the function body and replace it solely with the pre- and post-conditions).
Known issues:
* My original intent, as described in the MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/759) was to have a rustc-prefixed attribute namespace (like rustc_contracts::requires). But I could not get things working when I tried to do rewriting via a rustc-prefixed builtin attribute-macro. So for now it is called `contracts::requires`.
* Our attribute macro machinery does not provide direct support for attribute arguments that are parsed like rust expressions. I spent some time trying to add that (e.g. something that would parse the attribute arguments as an AST while treating the remainder of the items as a token-tree), but its too big a lift for me to undertake. So instead I hacked in something approximating that goal, by semi-trivially desugaring the token-tree attribute contents into internal AST constucts. This may be too fragile for the long-term.
* (In particular, it *definitely* breaks when you try to add a contract to a function like this: `fn foo1(x: i32) -> S<{ 23 }> { ... }`, because its token-tree based search for where to inject the internal AST constructs cannot immediately see that the `{ 23 }` is within a generics list. I think we can live for this for the short-term, i.e. land the work, and continue working on it while in parallel adding a new attribute variant that takes a token-tree attribute alongside an AST annotation, which would completely resolve the issue here.)
* the *intent* of `-Z contract-checks` is that it behaves like `-Z ub-checks`, in that we do not prematurely commit to including or excluding the contract evaluation in upstream crates (most notably, `core` and `std`). But the current test suite does not actually *check* that this is the case. Ideally the test suite would be extended with a multi-crate test that explores the matrix of enabling/disabling contracts on both the upstream lib and final ("leaf") bin crates.
|
|
Check ensures on early return due to Try / Yeet
Expand these two expressions to include a call to contract checking
|
|
lang items
includes post-developed commit: do not suggest internal-only keywords as corrections to parse failures.
includes post-developed commit: removed tabs that creeped in into rustfmt tool source code.
includes post-developed commit, placating rustfmt self dogfooding.
includes post-developed commit: add backquotes to prevent markdown checking from trying to treat an attr as a markdown hyperlink/
includes post-developed commit: fix lowering to keep contracts from being erroneously inherited by nested bodies (like closures).
Rebase Conflicts:
- compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs
- compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs
- compiler/rustc_span/src/hygiene.rs
Remove contracts keywords from diagnostic messages
|
|
|
|
for RFC 3550, tracking issue #123741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
|
|
|
|
Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.
Support default fields in enum struct variant
Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition:
```rust
pub enum Bar {
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant
```rust
Bar::Foo { .. }
```
`#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants.
Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields
```rust
pub enum Bar {
#[default]
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build.
Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled).
Properly instantiate MIR const
The following works:
```rust
struct S<A> {
a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(),
}
S::<i32> { .. }
```
Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval
We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users'
getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error
that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to
*always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted.
This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the
expression relies on a const parameter.
Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`:
- Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields.
- Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values.
- Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
|
|
Remove `hir::ArrayLen`
This refactoring removes `hir::ArrayLen`, replacing it with `hir::ConstArg`. To represent inferred array lengths (previously `hir::ArrayLen::Infer`), a new variant `ConstArgKind::Infer` is added.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
|
|
Remove Node::ArrayLenInfer
|
|
no longer necessary as we now always create a ` DefId` for anon-consts
|
|
|
|
|
|
compiler: apply clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr for CI
Apply lint https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/clone_on_ref_ptr for compiler, also see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131225#discussion_r1790109443.
Some Arc's can be misplaced with Lrc's, sorry.
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/enable.20more.20clippy.20lints.20for.20compiler.20.28and.5Cor.20std.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix anon const def-creation when macros are involved take 2
Fixes #130321
There were two cases that #129137 did not handle correctly:
- Given a const argument `Foo<{ bar!() }>` in which `bar!()` expands to `N`, we would visit the anon const and then visit the `{ bar() }` expression instead of visiting the macro call. This meant that we would build a def for the anon const as `{ bar!() }` is not a trivial const argument as `bar!()` is not a path.
- Given a const argument `Foo<{ bar!() }>` is which `bar!()` expands to `{ qux!() }` in which `qux!()` expands to `N`, it should not be considered a trivial const argument as `{{ N }}` has two pairs of braces. If we only looked at `qux`'s expansion it would *look* like a trivial const argument even though it is not. We have to track whether we have "unwrapped" a brace already when recursing into the expansions of `bar`/`qux`/any macro
r? `@camelid`
|
|
|
|
|
|
...and remove the `const_arg_path` feature gate as a result. It was only
a stopgap measure to fix the regression that the new lowering introduced
(which should now be fixed by this PR).
|
|
This is needed for Clippy to know that the `#[allow(unused)]` attributes
added by the expansion of `?` are part of the desugaring, and that they
do not come from the user code.
rust-lang/rust-clippy#13380 exhibits a manifestation of this problem.
|
|
|
