| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Avoid `GenFuture` shim when compiling async constructs
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators, with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
---
Given this demo code:
```rust
pub async fn a(arg: u32) -> Backtrace {
let bt = b().await;
let _arg = arg;
bt
}
pub async fn b() -> Backtrace {
Backtrace::force_capture()
}
```
I would get the following with the latest stable compiler (on Windows):
```
4: async_codegen::b::async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:10
5: core::future::from_generator::impl$1::poll<enum2$<async_codegen::b::async_fn_env$0> >
at /rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120\library\core\src\future\mod.rs:91
6: async_codegen::a::async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:4
7: core::future::from_generator::impl$1::poll<enum2$<async_codegen::a::async_fn_env$0> >
at /rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120\library\core\src\future\mod.rs:91
```
whereas now I get a much cleaner stack trace:
```
3: async_codegen::b::async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:10
4: async_codegen::a::async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:4
```
|
|
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove more `ref` patterns from the compiler
r? `@oli-obk`
Previous PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104500
|
|
Lower return type outside async block creation
This allows feeding a different output type to async blocks with a different `ImplTraitContext`. Spotted this while working on #104321
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Create def_id for async fns during lowering
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
`MacArgs` is an enum with three variants: `Empty`, `Delimited`, and `Eq`. It's
used in two ways:
- For representing attribute macro arguments (e.g. in `AttrItem`), where all
three variants are used.
- For representing function-like macros (e.g. in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`),
where only the `Delimited` variant is used.
In other words, `MacArgs` is used in two quite different places due to them
having partial overlap. I find this makes the code hard to read. It also leads
to various unreachable code paths, and allows invalid values (such as
accidentally using `MacArgs::Empty` in a `MacCall`).
This commit splits `MacArgs` in two:
- `DelimArgs` is a new struct just for the "delimited arguments" case. It is
now used in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`.
- `AttrArgs` is a renaming of the old `MacArgs` enum for the attribute macro
case. Its `Delimited` variant now contains a `DelimArgs`.
Various other related things are renamed as well.
These changes make the code clearer, avoids several unreachable paths, and
disallows the invalid values.
|
|
Support using `Self` or projections inside an RPIT/async fn
I reuse the same idea as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103449 to use variances to encode whether a lifetime parameter is captured by impl-trait.
The current implementation of async and RPIT replace all lifetimes from the parent generics by `'static`. This PR changes the scheme
```rust
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
fn foo<'b, T>() -> impl Into<Self> + 'b { ... }
}
opaque Foo::<'_a>::foo::<'_b, T>::opaque<'b>: Into<Foo<'_a>> + 'b;
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
// OLD
fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'static>::foo::<'static, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
^^^^^^^ the `Self` becomes `Foo<'static>`
// NEW
fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'a>::foo::<'b, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
^^ the `Self` stays `Foo<'a>`
}
```
There is the same issue with projections. In the example, substitute `Self` by `<T as Trait<'b>>::Assoc` in the sugared version, and `Foo<'_a>` by `<T as Trait<'_b>>::Assoc` in the desugared one.
This allows to support `Self` in impl-trait, since we do not replace lifetimes by `'static` any more. The same trick allows to use projections like `T::Assoc` where `Self` is allowed. The feature is gated behind a `impl_trait_projections` feature gate.
The implementation relies on 2 tweaking rules for opaques in 2 places:
- we only relate substs that correspond to captured lifetimes during TypeRelation;
- we only list captured lifetimes in choice region computation.
For simplicity, I encoded the "capturedness" of lifetimes as a variance, `Bivariant` vs `Invariant` for unused vs captured lifetimes. The `variances_of` query used to ICE for opaques.
Impl-trait that do not reference `Self` or projections will have their variances as:
- `o` (invariant) for each parent type or const;
- `*` (bivariant) for each parent lifetime --> will not participate in borrowck;
- `o` (invariant) for each own lifetime.
Impl-trait that does reference `Self` and/or projections will have some parent lifetimes marked as `o` (as the example above), and participate in type relation and borrowck. In the example above, `variances_of(opaque) = ['_a: o, '_b: *, T: o, 'b: o]`.
r? types
cc `@compiler-errors` , as you asked about the issue with `Self` and projections.
|
|
|
|
This allows feeding a different output type to async blocks with a
different `ImplTraitContext`.
|
|
Shrink `ast::Expr` harder
r? `@ghost`
|
|
Remove allow(rustc::potential_query_instability) from rustc_ast_lowering
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84447.
`@cjgillot` Thanks for helping me!
|
|
Support `#[track_caller]` on async fns
Adds `#[track_caller]` to the generator that is created when we desugar the async fn.
Fixes #78840
Open questions:
- What is the performance impact of adding `#[track_caller]` to every `GenFuture`'s `poll(...)` function, even if it's unused (i.e., the parent span does not set `#[track_caller]`)? We might need to set it only conditionally, if the indirection causes overhead we don't want.
|
|
Record `LocalDefId` in HIR nodes instead of a side table
This is part of an attempt to remove the `HirId -> LocalDefId` table from HIR.
This attempt is a prerequisite to creation of `LocalDefId` after HIR lowering (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96840), by controlling how `def_id` information is accessed.
This first part adds the information to HIR nodes themselves instead of a table.
The second part is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103902
The third part will be to make `hir::Visitor::visit_fn` take a `LocalDefId` as last parameter.
The fourth part will be to completely remove the side table.
|
|
|
|
patterns.
|
|
Instead of `ast::Lit`.
Literal lowering now happens at two different times. Expression literals
are lowered when HIR is crated. Attribute literals are lowered during
parsing.
This commit changes the language very slightly. Some programs that used
to not compile now will compile. This is because some invalid literals
that are removed by `cfg` or attribute macros will no longer trigger
errors. See this comment for more details:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102944#issuecomment-1277476773
|
|
Co-authored-by: Camille Gillot <gillot.camille@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
It seems to be used more for lookup than iteration, so this could be a
perf hit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch allows the usage of the `track_caller` annotation on
generators, as well as sets them conditionally if the parent also has
`track_caller` set.
Also add this annotation on the `GenFuture`'s `poll()` function.
|
|
|
|
Change #[suggestion_*] attributes to use style="..."
As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20tool_only_span_suggestion), this changes `#[(multipart_)suggestion_{short,verbose,hidden}(...)]` attributes to plain `#[(multipart_)suggestion(...)]` attributes with a `style = "{short,verbose,hidden}"` parameter.
It also adds a new style, `tool-only`, that corresponds to `tool_only_span_suggestion`/`tool_only_multipart_suggestion` and causes the suggestion to not be shown in human-readable output at all.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit, there's a bit of noise in there.
cc #100717 `@compiler-errors`
r? `@davidtwco`
|
|
Allow `impl Fn() -> impl Trait` in return position
_This was originally proposed as part of #93082 which was [closed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93082#issuecomment-1027225715) due to allowing `impl Fn() -> impl Trait` in argument position._
This allows writing the following function signatures:
```rust
fn f0() -> impl Fn() -> impl Trait;
fn f3() -> &'static dyn Fn() -> impl Trait;
```
These signatures were already allowed for common traits and associated types, there is no reason why `Fn*` traits should be special in this regard.
`impl Trait` in both `f0` and `f3` means "new existential type", just like with `-> impl Iterator<Item = impl Trait>` and such.
Arrow in `impl Fn() ->` is right-associative and binds from right to left, it's tested by [this test](https://github.com/WaffleLapkin/rust/blob/a819fecb8dea438fc70488ddec30a61e52942672/src/test/ui/impl-trait/impl_fn_associativity.rs).
There even is a test that `f0` compiles:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/2f004d2d401682e553af3984ebd9a3976885e752/src/test/ui/impl-trait/nested_impl_trait.rs#L25-L28
But it was changed in [PR 48084 (lines)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48084/files#diff-ccecca938872d65ffe8cd1c3ef1956e309fac83bcda547d8b16b89257e53a437R37) to test the opposite, probably unintentionally given [PR 48084 (lines)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48084/files#diff-5a02f1ed43debed1fd24f7aad72490064f795b9420f15d847bac822aa4621a1cR476-R477).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
----
This limitation is especially annoying with async code, since it forces one to write this:
```rust
trait AsyncFn3<A, B, C>: Fn(A, B, C) -> <Self as AsyncFn3<A, B, C>>::Future {
type Future: Future<Output = Self::Out>;
type Out;
}
impl<A, B, C, Fut, F> AsyncFn3<A, B, C> for F
where
F: Fn(A, B, C) -> Fut,
Fut: Future,
{
type Future = Fut;
type Out = Fut::Output;
}
fn async_closure() -> impl AsyncFn3<i32, i32, i32, Out = u32> {
|a, b, c| async move { (a + b + c) as u32 }
}
```
Instead of:
```rust
fn async_closure() -> impl Fn(i32, i32, i32) -> impl Future<Output = u32> {
|a, b, c| async move { (a + b + c) as u32 }
}
```
|
|
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
|
|
Using the following command:
find compiler/ -type f -name '*.rs' -exec perl -i -gpe \
's/(#\[\w*suggestion)_(short|verbose|hidden)\(\s*(\S+,)?/\1(\3style = "\2",/g' \
'{}' +
|
|
|
|
|
|
This allows writing the following function signatures:
```rust
fn f0() -> impl Fn() -> impl Trait;
fn f3() -> &'static dyn Fn() -> impl Trait;
```
These signatures were already allowed for common traits and associated
types, there is no reason why `Fn*` traits should be special in this
regard.
|
|
|
|
translation: doc comments with derives, subdiagnostic-less enum variants, more derive use
- Adds support for `doc` attributes in the diagnostic derives so that documentation comments don't result in the derive failing.
- Adds support for enum variants in the subdiagnostic derive to not actually correspond to an addition to a diagnostic.
- Made use of the derive in more places in the `rustc_ast_lowering`, `rustc_ast_passes`, `rustc_lint`, `rustc_session`, `rustc_infer` - taking advantage of recent additions like eager subdiagnostics, multispan suggestions, etc.
cc #100717
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize asm_sym
Tracking issue #93333
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1270
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
|
|
Drop temporaries created in a condition, even if it's a let chain
Fixes #100513.
During the lowering from AST to HIR we wrap expressions acting as conditions in a `DropTemps` expression so that any temporaries created in the condition are dropped after the condition is executed. Effectively this means we transform
```rust
if Some(1).is_some() { .. }
```
into (roughly)
```rust
if { let _t = Some(1).is_some(); _t } { .. }
```
so that if we create any temporaries, they're lifted into the new scope surrounding the condition, so for example something along the lines of
```rust
if { let temp = Some(1); let _t = temp.is_some(); _t }.
```
Before this PR, if the condition contained any let expressions we would not introduce that new scope, instead leaving the condition alone. This meant that in a let-chain like
```rust
if get_drop("first").is_some() && let None = get_drop("last") {
println!("second");
} else { .. }
```
the temporary created for `get_drop("first")` would be lifted into the _surrounding block_, which caused it to be dropped after the execution of the entire `if` expression.
After this PR, we wrap everything but the `let` expression in terminating scopes. The upside to this solution is that it's minimally invasive, but the downside is that in the worst case, an expression with `let` exprs interspersed like
```rust
if get_drop("first").is_some()
&& let Some(_a) = get_drop("fifth")
&& get_drop("second").is_some()
&& let Some(_b) = get_drop("fourth") { .. }
```
gets _multiple_ new scopes, roughly
```rust
if { let _t = get_drop("first").is_some(); _t }
&& let Some(_a) = get_drop("fifth")
&& { let _t = get_drop("second").is_some(); _t }
&& let Some(_b) = get_drop("fourth") { .. }
```
so instead of all of the temporaries being dropped at the end of the entire condition, they will be dropped right after they're evaluated (before the subsequent `let` expr). So while I'd say the drop behavior around let-chains is _less_ surprising after this PR, it still might not exactly match what people might expect.
For tests, I've just extended the drop order tests added in #100526. I'm not sure if that's the best way to go about it, though, so suggestions are welcome.
|
