about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-03-28Add `{ast,hir,thir}::PatKind::Missing` variants.Nicholas Nethercote-8/+3
"Missing" patterns are possible in bare fn types (`fn f(u32)`) and similar places. Currently these are represented in the AST with `ast::PatKind::Ident` with no `by_ref`, no `mut`, an empty ident, and no sub-pattern. This flows through to `{hir,thir}::PatKind::Binding` for HIR and THIR. This is a bit nasty. It's very non-obvious, and easy to forget to check for the exceptional empty identifier case. This commit adds a new variant, `PatKind::Missing`, to do it properly. The process I followed: - Add a `Missing` variant to `{ast,hir,thir}::PatKind`. - Chang `parse_param_general` to produce `ast::PatKind::Missing` instead of `ast::PatKind::Missing`. - Look through `kw::Empty` occurrences to find functions where an existing empty ident check needs replacing with a `PatKind::Missing` check: `print_param`, `check_trait_item`, `is_named_param`. - Add a `PatKind::Missing => unreachable!(),` arm to every exhaustive match identified by the compiler. - Find which arms are actually reachable by running the test suite, changing them to something appropriate, usually by looking at what would happen to a `PatKind::Ident`/`PatKind::Binding` with no ref, no `mut`, an empty ident, and no subpattern. Quite a few of the `unreachable!()` arms were never reached. This makes sense because `PatKind::Missing` can't happen in every pattern, only in places like bare fn tys and trait fn decls. I also tried an alternative approach: modifying `ast::Param::pat` to hold an `Option<P<Pat>>` instead of a `P<Pat>`, but that quickly turned into a very large and painful change. Adding `PatKind::Missing` is much easier.
2025-03-26expand: Leave traces when expanding `cfg` attributesVadim Petrochenkov-1/+1
2025-03-25Allow defining opaques in statics and constsMichael Goulet-20/+45
2025-03-25Make printing define_opaque less goofyMichael Goulet-7/+19
2025-03-20Auto merge of #138747 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-68x44rw, r=matthiaskrgrbors-2/+10
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #138435 (Add support for postfix yield expressions) - #138685 (Use `Option<Ident>` for lowered param names.) - #138700 (Suggest `-Whelp` when pass `--print lints` to rustc) - #138727 (Do not rely on `type_var_origin` in `OrphanCheckErr::NonLocalInputType`) - #138729 (Clean up `FnCtxt::resolve_coroutine_interiors`) - #138731 (coverage: Add LLVM plumbing for expansion regions) - #138732 (Use `def_path_str` for def id arg in `UnsupportedOpInfo`) - #138735 (Remove `llvm` and `llvms` triagebot ping aliases for `icebreakers-llvm` ping group) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-03-20Auto merge of #138515 - petrochenkov:cfgtrace, r=nnethercotebors-6/+13
expand: Leave traces when expanding `cfg_attr` attributes Currently `cfg_trace` just disappears during expansion, but after this PR `#[cfg_attr(some tokens)]` will leave a `#[cfg_attr_trace(some tokens)]` attribute instead of itself in AST after expansion (the new attribute is built-in and inert, its inner tokens are the same as in the original attribute). This trace attribute can then be used by lints or other diagnostics, #133823 has some examples. Tokens in these trace attributes are set to an empty token stream, so the traces are non-existent for proc macros and cannot affect any user-observable behavior. This is also a weakness, because if a proc macro processes some code with the trace attributes, they will be lost, so the traces are best effort rather than precise. The next step is to do the same thing with `cfg` attributes (`#[cfg(TRUE)]` currently remains in both AST and tokens after expanding, it should be replaced with a trace instead). The idea belongs to `@estebank.`
2025-03-20Rollup merge of #138435 - eholk:prefix-yield, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-2/+10
Add support for postfix yield expressions We've been having a discussion about whether we want postfix yield, or want to stick with prefix yield, or have both. I figured it's easy enough to support both for now and let us play around with them while the feature is still experimental. This PR treats `yield x` and `x.yield` as semantically equivalent. There was a suggestion to make `yield x` have a `()` type (so it only works in coroutines with `Resume = ()`. I think that'd be worth trying, either in a later PR, or before this one merges, depending on people's opinions. #43122
2025-03-20Use `-Wunused_crate_dependencies` for compiler crates.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+4
It's very useful. There are some false positives involving integration tests in `rustc_pattern_analysis` and `rustc_serialize`. There is also a false positive involving `rustc_driver_impl`'s `rustc_randomized_layouts` feature. And I removed a `rustc_span` mention in a doc comment in `rustc_log` because it wasn't integral to the comment but caused a dev-dependency.
2025-03-18Refactor YieldKind so postfix yield must have an expressionEric Holk-4/+2
2025-03-18Apply suggestions from code reviewEric Holk-1/+1
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
2025-03-17expand: Leave traces when expanding `cfg_attr` attributesVadim Petrochenkov-6/+13
2025-03-14Preserve yield position during pretty printingEric Holk-2/+12
2025-03-12Rollup merge of #138331 - nnethercote:use-RUSTC_LINT_FLAGS-more, ↵Matthias Krüger-1/+0
r=onur-ozkan,jieyouxu Use `RUSTC_LINT_FLAGS` more An alternative to the failed #138084. Fixes #138106. r? ````@jieyouxu````
2025-03-11Auto merge of #128440 - oli-obk:defines, r=lcnrbors-12/+12
Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed. A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table. Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable. Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature. One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now. fixes #131298
2025-03-11Implement `#[define_opaque]` attribute for functions.Oli Scherer-12/+12
2025-03-11Remove `#![warn(unreachable_pub)]` from all `compiler/` crates.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+0
It's no longer necessary now that `-Wunreachable_pub` is being passed.
2025-03-10Revert "Use workspace lints for crates in `compiler/` #138084"许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-3/+1
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's `workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts). This breakage was reported in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>. This reverts commit 48caf81484b50dca5a5cebb614899a3df81ca898, reversing changes made to c6662879b27f5161e95f39395e3c9513a7b97028.
2025-03-09Rollup merge of #138084 - nnethercote:workspace-lints, r=jieyouxuMatthias Krüger-1/+3
Use workspace lints for crates in `compiler/` This is nicer and hopefully less error prone than specifying lints via bootstrap. r? ``@jieyouxu``
2025-03-08Remove `#![warn(unreachable_pub)]` from all `compiler/` crates.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+0
(Except for `rustc_codegen_cranelift`.) It's no longer necessary now that `unreachable_pub` is in the workspace lints.
2025-03-08Specify rust lints for `compiler/` crates via Cargo.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+3
By naming them in `[workspace.lints.rust]` in the top-level `Cargo.toml`, and then making all `compiler/` crates inherit them with `[lints] workspace = true`. (I omitted `rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}`, because they're a bit different.) The advantages of this over the current approach: - It uses a standard Cargo feature, rather than special handling in bootstrap. So, easier to understand, and less likely to get accidentally broken in the future. - It works for proc macro crates. It's a shame it doesn't work for rustc-specific lints, as the comments explain.
2025-03-07Rollup merge of #134797 - spastorino:ergonomic-ref-counting-1, r=nikomatsakisMatthias Krüger-0/+9
Ergonomic ref counting This is an experimental first version of ergonomic ref counting. This first version implements most of the RFC but doesn't implement any of the optimizations. This was left for following iterations. RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3680 Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132290 Project goal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/107 r? ```@nikomatsakis```
2025-03-06Use closure parse codeSantiago Pastorino-0/+1
2025-03-06Implement .use keyword as an alias of cloneSantiago Pastorino-0/+8
2025-03-05Implement `&pin const self` and `&pin mut self` sugarsFrank King-0/+7
2025-03-04Auto merge of #137959 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-62vjvwr, r=matthiaskrgrbors-22/+23
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #135767 (Future incompatibility warning `unsupported_fn_ptr_calling_conventions`: Also warn in dependencies) - #137852 (Remove layouting dead code for non-array SIMD types.) - #137863 (Fix pretty printing of unsafe binders) - #137882 (do not build additional stage on compiler paths) - #137894 (Revert "store ScalarPair via memset when one side is undef and the other side can be memset") - #137902 (Make `ast::TokenKind` more like `lexer::TokenKind`) - #137921 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`) - #137922 (A few cleanups after the removal of `cfg(not(parallel))`) - #137939 (fix order on shl impl) - #137946 (Fix docker run-local docs) - #137955 (Always allow rustdoc-json tests to contain long lines) - #137958 (triagebot.toml: Don't label `test/rustdoc-json` as A-rustdoc-search) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-03-03Rename `ast::TokenKind::Not` as `ast::TokenKind::Bang`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
For consistency with `rustc_lexer::TokenKind::Bang`, and because other `ast::TokenKind` variants generally have syntactic names instead of semantic names (e.g. `Star` and `DotDot` instead of `Mul` and `Range`).
2025-03-03Replace `ast::TokenKind::BinOp{,Eq}` and remove `BinOpToken`.Nicholas Nethercote-20/+21
`BinOpToken` is badly named, because it only covers the assignable binary ops and excludes comparisons and `&&`/`||`. Its use in `ast::TokenKind` does allow a small amount of code sharing, but it's a clumsy factoring. This commit removes `ast::TokenKind::BinOp{,Eq}`, replacing each one with 10 individual variants. This makes `ast::TokenKind` more similar to `rustc_lexer::TokenKind`, which has individual variants for all operators. Although the number of lines of code increases, the number of chars decreases due to the frequent use of shorter names like `token::Plus` instead of `token::BinOp(BinOpToken::Plus)`.
2025-03-01Implment `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` in `where` clausesFrank King-1/+2
2025-02-27Introduce `AssocOp::Binary`.Nicholas Nethercote-4/+3
It mirrors `ExprKind::Binary`, and contains a `BinOpKind`. This makes `AssocOp` more like `ExprKind`. Note that the variants removed from `AssocOp` are all named differently to `BinOpToken`, e.g. `Multiply` instead of `Mul`, so that's an inconsistency removed. The commit adds `precedence` and `fixity` methods to `BinOpKind`, and calls them from the corresponding methods in `AssocOp`. This avoids the need to create an `AssocOp` from a `BinOpKind` in a bunch of places, and `AssocOp::from_ast_binop` is removed. `AssocOp::to_ast_binop` is also no longer needed. Overall things are shorter and nicer.
2025-02-23Put shebang at the top of pretty-printVladislav-0/+19
2025-02-23Rollup merge of #137423 - Urgau:imprv-pretty-hir, r=compiler-errorsJacob Pratt-5/+9
Improve a bit HIR pretty printer This PR improve (a bit) the HIR pretty printer. It does so by: - Not printing elided lifetimes (those are not expressible in surface Rust anyway) - And by rendering implicit self with the shorthand syntax I also tried fixing some indentation and other things but gave up for now. Best reviewed commit by commit.
2025-02-22Filter elided lifetimes in HIR pretty printingUrgau-5/+9
2025-02-22Upgrade the compiler to edition 2024Michael Goulet-1/+1
2025-02-11Add a TyPat in the AST to reuse the generic arg lowering logicOli Scherer-1/+23
2025-02-06Auto merge of #136471 - safinaskar:parallel, r=SparrowLiibors-2/+2
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc` tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc` This is continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132282 . I'm pretty sure I did everything right. In particular, I searched all occurrences of `Lrc` in submodules and made sure that they don't need replacement. There are other possibilities, through. We can define `enum Lrc<T> { Rc(Rc<T>), Arc(Arc<T>) }`. Or we can make `Lrc` a union and on every clone we can read from special thread-local variable. Or we can add a generic parameter to `Lrc` and, yes, this parameter will be everywhere across all codebase. So, if you think we should take some alternative approach, then don't merge this PR. But if it is decided to stick with `Arc`, then, please, merge. cc "Parallel Rustc Front-end" ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113349 ) r? SparrowLii `@rustbot` label WG-compiler-parallel
2025-02-03Express contracts as part of function header and lower it to the contract ↵Celina G. Val-1/+20
lang items includes post-developed commit: do not suggest internal-only keywords as corrections to parse failures. includes post-developed commit: removed tabs that creeped in into rustfmt tool source code. includes post-developed commit, placating rustfmt self dogfooding. includes post-developed commit: add backquotes to prevent markdown checking from trying to treat an attr as a markdown hyperlink/ includes post-developed commit: fix lowering to keep contracts from being erroneously inherited by nested bodies (like closures). Rebase Conflicts: - compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs - compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs - compiler/rustc_span/src/hygiene.rs Remove contracts keywords from diagnostic messages
2025-02-03tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`Askar Safin-2/+2
2025-01-28Refactor FnKind variant to hold &FnCelina G. Val-19/+9
2025-01-08Rename PatKind::Lit to ExprOli Scherer-1/+1
2024-12-27Rollup merge of #134834 - dtolnay:unnamedcall, r=compiler-errorsDavid Tolnay-1/+3
Skip parenthesis around tuple struct field calls The pretty-printer previously did not distinguish between named vs unnamed fields when printing a function call containing a struct field. It would print the call as `(self.fun)()` for a named field which is correct, and `(self.0)()` for an unnamed field which is redundant. This PR changes function calls of tuple struct fields to print without parens. **Before:** ```rust struct Tuple(fn()); fn main() { let tuple = Tuple(|| {}); (tuple.0)(); } ``` **After:** ```rust struct Tuple(fn()); fn main() { let tuple = Tuple(|| {}); tuple.0(); } ```
2024-12-27Skip parenthesis around tuple struct field callsDavid Tolnay-1/+3
2024-12-27Skip parenthesis if `.` makes statement boundary unambiguousDavid Tolnay-11/+31
2024-12-23Use `#[derive(Default)]` instead of manually implementing itEsteban Küber-15/+3
2024-12-20Support pretty-printing dyn* trait objectsDavid Tolnay-2/+4
2024-12-18Rollup merge of #134161 - nnethercote:overhaul-token-cursors, r=spastorino许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-1/+1
Overhaul token cursors Some nice cleanups here. r? `````@davidtwco`````
2024-12-18Re-export more `rustc_span::symbol` things from `rustc_span`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+4
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from `rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good reason. This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`, and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to `rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to one.
2024-12-18Rename `RefTokenTreeCursor`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
Because `TokenStreamIter` is a much better name for a `TokenStream` iterator. Also rename the `TokenStream::trees` method as `TokenStream::iter`, and some local variables.
2024-12-16Rollup merge of #134284 - estebank:issue-74863, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-1/+4
Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses `..`, we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between `..` and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error. ``` error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:18:30 | LL | if let Website { url, .. } = website { | ------------------- this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website` LL | println!("[{}]({})", title, url); | ^^^^^ not found in this scope ``` Fix #74863.
2024-12-15Add hir::AttributeJonathan Dönszelmann-12/+5
2024-12-15Rename `value` field to `expr` to simplify later commits' diffsOli Scherer-2/+2