| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=oli-obk
Store the laziness of type aliases in their `DefKind`
Previously, we would treat paths referring to type aliases as *lazy* type aliases if the current crate had lazy type aliases enabled independently of whether the crate which the alias was defined in had the feature enabled or not.
With this PR, the laziness of a type alias depends on the crate it is defined in. This generally makes more sense to me especially if / once lazy type aliases become the default in a new edition and we need to think about *edition interoperability*:
Consider the hypothetical case where the dependency crate has an older edition (and thus eager type aliases), it exports a type alias with bounds & a where-clause (which are void but technically valid), the dependent crate has the latest edition (and thus lazy type aliases) and it uses that type alias. Arguably, the bounds should *not* be checked since at any time, the dependency crate should be allowed to change the bounds at will with a *non*-major version bump & without negatively affecting downstream crates.
As for the reverse case (dependency: lazy type aliases, dependent: eager type aliases), I guess it rules out anything from slight confusion to mild annoyance from upstream crate authors that would be caused by the compiler ignoring the bounds of their type aliases in downstream crates with older editions.
---
This fixes #114468 since before, my assumption that the type alias associated with a given weak projection was lazy (and therefore had its variances computed) did not necessarily hold in cross-crate scenarios (which [I kinda had a hunch about](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114253#discussion_r1278608099)) as outlined above. Now it does hold.
`@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
Account for `Rc` and `Arc` when suggesting to clone
When suggesting to clone a reference-counted value, be less uncertain.
|
|
Improve spans for indexing expressions
fixes #114388
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part, but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
r? compiler-errors
|
|
When suggesting to clone a reference-counted value, be less uncertain.
|
|
|
|
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary
left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part
of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part,
but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use
indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and
that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an
extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
|
|
Perform OpaqueCast field projection on HIR, too.
fixes #105819
This is necessary for closure captures in 2021 edition, as they capture individual fields, not the full mentioned variables. So it may try to capture a field of an opaque (because the hidden type is known to be something with a field).
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99806 for when and why we added OpaqueCast to MIR.
|
|
It lints against features that are inteded to be internal to the
compiler and standard library. Implements MCP #596.
We allow `internal_features` in the standard library and compiler as those
use many features and this _is_ the standard library from the "internal to the compiler and
standard library" after all.
Marking some features as internal wasn't exactly the most scientific approach, I just marked some
mostly obvious features. While there is a categorization in the macro,
it's not very well upheld (should probably be fixed in another PR).
We always pass `-Ainternal_features` in the testsuite
About 400 UI tests and several other tests use internal features.
Instead of throwing the attribute on each one, just always allow them.
There's nothing wrong with testing internal features^^
|
|
|
|
Use `upvar_tys` in more places, make it return a list
Just a cleanup that fell out of a PR that I was gonna write, but that PR kinda got stuck.
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114178 (Account for macros when suggesting a new let binding)
- #114199 (Don't unsize coerce infer vars in select in new solver)
- #114301 (Don't check unnecessarily that impl trait is RPIT)
- #114314 (Tweaks to `adt_sized_constraint`)
- #114322 (Fix invalid slice coercion suggestion reported in turbofish)
- #114340 ([rustc_attr][nit] Replace `filter` + `is_some` with `map_or`.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Account for macros when suggesting a new let binding
Provide a structured suggestion when the expression comes from a macro expansion:
```
error[E0716]: temporary value dropped while borrowed
--> $DIR/borrowck-let-suggestion.rs:2:17
|
LL | let mut x = vec![1].iter();
| ^^^^^^^ - temporary value is freed at the end of this statement
| |
| creates a temporary value which is freed while still in use
LL |
LL | x.use_mut();
| - borrow later used here
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `vec` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: consider using a `let` binding to create a longer lived value
|
LL ~ let binding = vec![1];
LL ~ let mut x = binding.iter();
|
```
|
|
add `dropck_outlives` comments
|
|
|
|
Only consider places with the same local in each_borrow_involving_path.
This avoids having a busy loop that repeatedly checks for equality of locals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inline format!() args from rustc_codegen_llvm to the end (4)
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
|
|
Double check that hidden types match the expected hidden type
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113278 specifically, but I left a TODO for where we should also add some hardening.
It feels a bit like papering over the issue, but at least this way we don't get unsoundness, but just surprising errors. Errors will be improved and given spans before this PR lands.
r? `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
|
|
r? @WaffleLapkin
|
|
During borrowck, the `MultiSpan` from a buffered diagnostic is cloned and
used to emit a delayed bug indicating a diagnostic was buffered - when
the buffered diagnostic is translated, then the cloned `MultiSpan` may
contain labels which can only render with the diagnostic's arguments, but
the delayed bug being emitted won't have those arguments. Adds a function
which clones `MultiSpan` without also cloning the contained labels, and
use this function when creating the buffered diagnostic delayed bug.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=cjgillot
Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions
This is a continued work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113567
We have several other suggestions not working for closure, this PR use `maybe_body_owned_by` to fix them and add test cases for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=oli-obk
(re-)tighten sourceinfo span of adjustments in MIR
Diagnostics rely on the spans of MIR statements being (approximately) correct in order to give suggestions relative to that span (i.e. `shrink_to_hi` and `shrink_to_lo`).
I discovered that we're *intentionally* lowering THIR exprs with their parent expr's span if they come from adjustments that are due to a parent expression. While I understand why that may be desirable to demonstrate the relationship of an adjustment and the expression that requires it, it leads to
1. very verbose borrowck output
2. incorrect spans for suggestions
Some diagnostics get around that by giving suggestions relative to other spans we've collected during MIR lowering, such as the span of the method's identifier (e.g. `name` in `.name()`), but this doesn't work too well when things come from desugaring.
I assume it also has lead to numerous tweaks and complications to diagnostics code down the road, which this PR doesn't necessarily aim to fix but may open the gates to fixing later... The last three commits are simplifications due to the fact that we can assume that the move span actually points to what is being moved (and a test).
This regressed in #89110, which was debated somewhat in #90286. cc `@Aaron1011` who originally made this change.
r? diagnostics
Fixes #113547
Fixes #111016
|
|
Rewrite `UnDerefer`, again
This PR is intended to improve the perf regression introduced by #112882.
`UnDerefer` has been separated out again for borrowck reasons. It was a bit overzealous to remove it in the previous PR.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
It makes it sound like the `ExprKind` and `Rvalue` are supposed to represent all pointer related
casts, when in reality their just used to share a some enum variants. Make it clear there these
are only coercion to make it clear why only some pointer related "casts" are in the enum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite `UnDerefer`
Currently, `UnDerefer` is used by drop elaboration to undo the effects of the `Derefer` pass. However, it just recreates the original places with derefs in the middle of the projection. Because `ProjectionElem::Deref` is intended to be removed completely in the future, this will not work forever.
This PR introduces a `deref_chain` method that returns the places behind `DerefTemp` locals in a place and rewrites the move path code to use this. In the process, `UnDerefer` was merged into `MovePathLookup`. Now that move paths use the same places as in the MIR, the other uses of `UnDerefer` no longer require it.
See #98145
cc `@ouz-a`
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Better messages for next on a iterator inside for loops
Fixes #102972
|
|
|
|
|
|
suggest `slice::swap` for `mem::swap(&mut x[0], &mut x[1])` borrowck error
Recently saw someone ask why this code (example slightly modified):
```rs
fn main() {
let mut foo = [1, 2];
std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
}
```
triggers this error and how to fix it:
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo[_]` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/main.rs:4:33
|
4 | std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
| -------------- ----------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
| | |
| | first mutable borrow occurs here
| first borrow later used by call
|
= help: consider using `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
The current help message is nice and goes in the right direction, but I think we can do better for this specific instance and suggest `slice::swap`, which makes this compile
|
