| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Follow up to #92959. Address #94508.
|
|
then we just suggest the first legal position where you could inject a use.
To do this, I added `inject_use_span` field to `ModSpans`, and populate it in
parser (it is the span of the first token found after inner attributes, if any).
Then I rewrote the use-suggestion code to utilize it, and threw out some stuff
that is now unnecessary with this in place. (I think the result is easier to
understand.)
Then I added a test of issue 87613.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve allowness of the unexpected_cfgs lint
This pull-request improve the allowness (`#[allow(...)]`) of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint.
Before this PR only crate level `#![allow(unexpected_cfgs)]` worked, now with this PR it also work when put around `cfg!` or if it is in a upper level. Making it work ~for the attributes `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, ...~ for the same level is awkward as the current code is design to give "Some parent node that is close to this macro call" (cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_expand/base/struct.ExpansionData.html) meaning that allow on the same line as an attribute won't work. I'm note even sure if this would be possible.
Found while working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94298.
r? ````````@petrochenkov````````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide ignore message in the result of test
Provide ignore the message in the result of the test.
This PR does not need RFC, because it is about the presentation of the report of `cargo test`.
However, the following document listed here helps you to know about PR.
- [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3217)
- [Rendered](https://github.com/yanganto/rfcs/blob/ignore-test-message/text/0000-ignore-test-message.md)
- [Previous discussion on IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-provide-ignore-message-when-the-test-ignored/15904)
If there is something improper, please let me know.
Thanks.
|
|
As an example:
#[test]
#[ignore = "not yet implemented"]
fn test_ignored() {
...
}
Will now render as:
running 2 tests
test tests::test_ignored ... ignored, not yet implemented
test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
|
|
|
|
Adopt let else in more places
Continuation of #89933, #91018, #91481, #93046, #93590, #94011.
I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This is the biggest of these PRs and handles the changes outside of rustdoc, rustc_typeck, rustc_const_eval, rustc_trait_selection, which were handled in PRs #94139, #94142, #94143, #94144.
|
|
|
|
Add more info and suggestions to use of #[test] on invalid items
This pr changes the diagnostics for using `#[test]` on an item that can't be used as a test to explain that the attribute has no meaningful effect on non-functions and suggests the use of `#[cfg(test)]` for conditional compilation instead.
Example change:
```rs
#[test]
mod test {}
```
previously output
```
error: only functions may be used as tests
--> src/lib.rs:2:1
|
2 | mod test {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
```
now outputs
```
error: the `#[test]` attribute may only be used on a non-associated function
--> $DIR/test-on-not-fn.rs:3:1
|
LL | #[test]
| ^^^^^^^
LL | mod test {}
| ----------- expected a non-associated function, found a module
|
= note: the `#[test]` macro causes a a function to be run on a test and has no effect on non-functions
help: replace with conditional compilation to make the item only exist when tests are being run
|
LL | #[cfg(test)]
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
|
|
Deny mixing bin crate type with lib crate types
The produced library would get a main shim too which conflicts with the
main shim of the executable linking the library.
```
$ cat > main1.rs <<EOF
fn main() {}
pub fn bar() {}
EOF
$ cat > main2.rs <<EOF
extern crate main1;
fn main() {
main1::bar();
}
EOF
$ rustc --crate-type bin --crate-type lib main1.rs
$ rustc -L. main2.rs
error: linking with `cc` failed: exit status: 1
[...]
= note: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/crate_bin_lib/libmain1.rlib(main1.main1.707747aa-cgu.0.rcgu.o): in function `main':
main1.707747aa-cgu.0:(.text.main+0x0): multiple definition of `main'; main2.main2.02a148fe-cgu.0.rcgu.o:main2.02a148fe-cgu.0:(.text.main+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
```
|
|
Even more let_else adoptions
Continuation of #89933, #91018, #91481, #93046, #93590.
|
|
Correctly mark the span of captured arguments in `format_args!()`
It should not include the braces, or misspelling suggestions will be wrong.
Fixes #94010.
|
|
|
|
Resolve concern of `derive_default_enum`
This resolves the concern in favor of prohibiting multiple instances of
the attribute. This is similar to non-helper attributes as introduced in
#88681.
``@rustbot`` label +S-waiting-on-review +T-libs-api
|
|
It should only include the identifier, or misspelling suggestions will be wrong.
|
|
This option introduced in #15820 allows a custom crate to be imported in
the place of std, but with the name std. I don't think there is any
value to this. At most it is confusing users of a driver that uses this option. There are no users of
this option on github. If anyone still needs it, they can emulate it
injecting #![no_core] in addition to their own prelude.
|
|
r=matthewjasper
Point at type when a `static` `#[global_allocator]` doesn't `impl` `GlobalAlloc`
|
|
update comment wrt const param defaults
after #93669 i looked through all other uses of `GenericParamKind::Const` again to detect if we missed the `default` there as well, but afaict we really only missed lifetime resolution '^^ at least i found an outdated comment :3
|
|
remove `allow_fail` test flag
close #93345
|
|
Don't allow {} to refer to implicit captures in format_args.
Fixes #93378
|
|
Fix invalid special casing of the unreachable! macro
This pull-request fix an invalid special casing of the `unreachable!` macro in the same way the `panic!` macro was solved, by adding two new internal only macros `unreachable_2015` and `unreachable_2021` edition dependent and turn `unreachable!` into a built-in macro that do dispatching. This logic is stolen from the `panic!` macro.
~~This pull-request also adds an internal feature `format_args_capture_non_literal` that allows capturing arguments from formatted string that expanded from macros. The original RFC #2795 mentioned this as a future possibility. This feature is [required](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92137#issuecomment-1018630522) because of concatenation that needs to be done inside the macro:~~
```rust
$crate::concat!("internal error: entered unreachable code: ", $fmt)
```
**In summary** the new behavior for the `unreachable!` macro with this pr is:
Edition 2021:
```rust
let x = 5;
unreachable!("x is {x}");
```
```
internal error: entered unreachable code: x is 5
```
Edition <= 2018:
```rust
let x = 5;
unreachable!("x is {x}");
```
```
internal error: entered unreachable code: x is {x}
```
Also note that the change in this PR are **insta-stable** and **breaking changes** but this a considered as being a [bug](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92137#issuecomment-998441613).
If someone could start a perf run and then a crater run this would be appreciated.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodate yield points in the format_args expansion
Fixes #93274.
For the case `println!("{} {:?}", "", async {}.await)` in the issue, the expansion before:
```rust
::std::io::_print(
::core::fmt::Arguments::new_v1(
&["", " ", "\n"],
&[
::core::fmt::ArgumentV1::new(&"", ::core::fmt::Display::fmt),
::core::fmt::ArgumentV1::new(&async {}.await, ::core::fmt::Debug::fmt),
],
),
);
```
After:
```rust
::std::io::_print(
::core::fmt::Arguments::new_v1(
&["", " ", "\n"],
&match (&"", &async {}.await) {
_args => [
::core::fmt::ArgumentV1::new(_args.0, ::core::fmt::Display::fmt),
::core::fmt::ArgumentV1::new(_args.1, ::core::fmt::Debug::fmt),
],
},
),
);
```
|
|
Create `core::fmt::ArgumentV1` with generics instead of fn pointer
Split from (and prerequisite of) #90488, as this seems to have perf implication.
`@rustbot` label: +T-libs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove deprecated LLVM-style inline assembly
The `llvm_asm!` was deprecated back in #87590 1.56.0, with intention to remove
it once `asm!` was stabilized, which already happened in #91728 1.59.0. Now it
is time to remove `llvm_asm!` to avoid continued maintenance cost.
Closes #70173.
Closes #92794.
Closes #87612.
Closes #82065.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-inline-asm`
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
The produced library would get a main shim too which conflicts with the
main shim of the executable linking the library.
```
$ cat > main1.rs <<EOF
fn main() {}
pub fn bar() {}
EOF
$ cat > main2.rs <<EOF
extern crate main1;
fn main() {
main1::bar();
}
EOF
$ rustc --crate-type bin --crate-type lib main1.rs
$ rustc -L. main2.rs
error: linking with `cc` failed: exit status: 1
[...]
= note: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/crate_bin_lib/libmain1.rlib(main1.main1.707747aa-cgu.0.rcgu.o): in function `main':
main1.707747aa-cgu.0:(.text.main+0x0): multiple definition of `main'; main2.main2.02a148fe-cgu.0.rcgu.o:main2.02a148fe-cgu.0:(.text.main+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
```
|
|
|
|
To more easily allow rustfmt to format the asm! macro as specified in
rust-dev-tools/fmt-rfcs#152 certain fields are made public.
|
|
Support [x; n] expressions in concat_bytes!
Currently trying to use `concat_bytes!` with a repeating array value like `[42; 5]` results in an error:
```
error: expected a byte literal
--> src/main.rs:3:27
|
3 | let x = concat_bytes!([3; 4]);
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: only byte literals (like `b"foo"`, `b's'`, and `[3, 4, 5]`) can be passed to `concat_bytes!()`
```
This makes it so repeating array syntax can be used the same way normal arrays can be. The RFC doesn't explicitly mention repeat expressions, but it seems reasonable to allow them as well, since normal arrays are allowed.
It is possible to make the compiler get stuck compiling forever with `concat_bytes!([3; 999999999])`, but I don't think that's much of an issue since you can do that already with `const X: [u8; 999999999] = [3; 999999999];`.
Contributes to #87555.
|
|
|
|
format_foreign::printf::Substitution::Escape
|
|
This resolves the concern in favor of prohibiting multiple instances of
the attribute. This is similar to non-helper attributes as introduced in
#88681.
|
