about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2023-03-27Rollup merge of #109354 - Swatinem:rm-closureid, r=compiler-errorsGuillaume Gomez-1/+1
Remove the `NodeId` of `ast::ExprKind::Async` This is a followup to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104833#pullrequestreview-1314537416. In my original attempt, I was using `LoweringContext::expr`, which was not correct as it creates a fresh `DefId`. It now uses the correct `DefId` for the wrapping `Expr`, and also makes forwarding `#[track_caller]` attributes more explicit.
2023-03-23rustc_interface: Add a new query `pre_configure`Vadim Petrochenkov-5/+12
It partially expands crate attributes before the main expansion pass (without modifying the crate), and the produced preliminary crate attribute list is used for querying a few attributes that are required very early. Crate-level cfg attributes are then expanded normally during the main expansion pass, like attributes on any other nodes.
2023-03-23expand: Pass `ast::Crate` by reference to AST transforming passesVadim Petrochenkov-19/+9
Also some more attributes are passed by reference.
2023-03-22rustc: Remove unused `Session` argument from some attribute functionsVadim Petrochenkov-45/+35
2023-03-20Rollup merge of #109301 - Ezrashaw:fix-ctf-ice, r=NilstriebMatthias Krüger-2/+24
fix: fix ICE in `custom-test-frameworks` feature Fixes #107454 Simple fix to emit error instead of ICEing. At some point, all the code in `tests.rs` should be refactored, there is a bit of duplication (this PR's code is repeated five times over lol). r? `@Nilstrieb` (active on the linked issue?)
2023-03-19Remove the `NodeId` of `ast::ExprKind::Async`Arpad Borsos-1/+1
2023-03-19fix: fix ICE in `custom-test-frameworks` featureEzra Shaw-2/+24
2023-03-15Implementing "<test_binary> --list --format json" #107307 #49359Partha P. Das-1/+26
2023-03-14Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses capturesNilstrieb-35/+44
Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-03-12Remove `box_syntax` from AST and use in toolsclubby789-1/+0
2023-03-12Rollup merge of #108726 - est31:backticks_matchmaking_tidy, r=NilstriebMatthias Krüger-0/+1
tidy: enforce comment blocks to have an even number of backticks After PR #108694, most unmatched backticks in `compiler/` comments have been eliminated. This PR adds a tidy lint to ensure no new unmatched backticks are added, and either addresses the lint in the remaining instances it found, or allows it. Very often, backtick containing sections wrap around lines, for example: ```Rust // This function takes a tuple `(Vec<String>, // Box<[u8]>)` and transforms it into `Vec<u8>`. ``` The lint is implemented to work on top of blocks, counting each line with a `//` into a block, and counting if there are an odd or even number of backticks in the entire block, instead of looking at just a single line.
2023-03-11Simplify message pathsest31-1/+1
This makes it easier to open the messages file while developing on features. The commit was the result of automatted changes: for p in compiler/rustc_*; do mv $p/locales/en-US.ftl $p/messages.ftl; rmdir $p/locales; done for p in compiler/rustc_*; do sed -i "s#\.\./locales/en-US.ftl#../messages.ftl#" $p/src/lib.rs; done
2023-03-11Address the new odd backticks tidy lint in compiler/est31-0/+1
2023-03-11Rollup merge of #106844 - Ezrashaw:concat-negative-int-lit, r=dtolnayMatthias Krüger-1/+14
allow negative numeric literals in `concat!` Fixes #106837 While *technically* negative numeric literals are implemented as unary operations, users can reasonably expect that negative literals are treated the same as positive literals.
2023-03-10Rollup merge of #105798 - Amanieu:relax-asm, r=joshtriplettMatthias Krüger-31/+4
Relax ordering rules for `asm!` operands The `asm!` and `global_asm!` macros require their operands to appear strictly in the following order: - Template strings - Positional operands - Named operands - Explicit register operands - `clobber_abi` - `options` This is overly strict and can be inconvienent when building complex `asm!` statements with macros. This PR relaxes the ordering requirements as follows: - Template strings must still come before all other operands. - Positional operands must still come before named and explicit register operands. - Named and explicit register operands can be freely mixed. - `options` and `clobber_abi` can appear in any position after the template strings. r? ```````@joshtriplett```````
2023-02-28Explain compile-time vs run-time difference in env!() error messageKornel-10/+30
2023-02-24Replace parse_[sth]_expr with parse_expr_[sth] function namesest31-1/+1
This resolves an inconsistency in naming style for functions on the parser, between functions parsing specific kinds of items and those for expressions, favoring the parse_item_[sth] style used by functions for items. There are multiple advantages of that style: * functions of both categories are collected in the same place in the rustdoc output. * it helps with autocompletion, as you can narrow down your search for a function to those about expressions. * it mirrors rust's path syntax where less specific things come first, then it gets more specific, i.e. std::collections::hash_map::Entry The disadvantage is that it doesn't "read like a sentence" any more, but I think the advantages weigh more greatly. This change was mostly application of this command: sed -i -E 's/(fn |\.)parse_([[:alnum:]_]+)_expr/\1parse_expr_\2/' compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/*.rs Plus very minor fixes outside of rustc_parse, and an invocation of x fmt.
2023-02-22errors: generate typed identifiers in each crateDavid Wood-0/+9
Instead of loading the Fluent resources for every crate in `rustc_error_messages`, each crate generates typed identifiers for its own diagnostics and creates a static which are pulled together in the `rustc_driver` crate and provided to the diagnostic emitter. Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in a few more AST types.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+3
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in `ast::ExprKind::Match`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+5
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in `ast::PatKind::Struct`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in `ast::Block`.Nicholas Nethercote-28/+28
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in various AST types.Nicholas Nethercote-82/+96
This commit changes the sequence parsers to produce `ThinVec`, which triggers numerous conversions.
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in `ast::Impl` and related types.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+2
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in `ast::WhereClause`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+6
2023-02-21Use `ThinVec` in `ast::Generics` and related types.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+5
2023-02-21Upgrade `thin-vec` from 0.2.9 to 0.2.12.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
Because 0.2.10 added supports for `ThinVec::splice`, and 0.2.12 is the latest release.
2023-02-19Auto merge of #108128 - clubby789:builtin-derived-attr, r=jackh726bors-2/+1
Properly check for builtin derived code Fixes #108122
2023-02-16Properly check for builtin derivesclubby789-2/+1
2023-02-16Replace some `then`s with some `then_some`sMaybe Waffle-1/+1
2023-02-16`if $c:expr { Some($r:expr) } else { None }` =>> `$c.then(|| $r)`Maybe Waffle-11/+7
2023-02-09Extend `BYTE_SLICE_IN_PACKED_STRUCT_WITH_DERIVE`.Nicholas Nethercote-20/+35
To temporarily allow a `str` field in a packed struct using `derive`, along with `[u8]`.
2023-02-07Add ~const bounds trait bounds when using derive_constMichael Goulet-10/+27
2023-02-02Don't generate unecessary `&&self.field` in deriving Debugclubby789-5/+20
2023-02-01Fix syntax in `-Zunpretty-expanded` output for derived `PartialEq`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+19
If you do `derive(PartialEq)` on a packed struct, the output shown by `-Zunpretty=expanded` includes expressions like this: ``` { self.x } == { other.x } ``` This is invalid syntax. This doesn't break compilation, because the AST nodes are constructed within the compiler. But it does mean anyone using `-Zunpretty=expanded` output as a guide for hand-written impls could get a nasty surprise. This commit fixes things by instead using this form: ``` ({ self.x }) == ({ other.x }) ```
2023-01-30Allow more deriving on packed structs.Nicholas Nethercote-48/+98
Currently, deriving on packed structs has some non-trivial limitations, related to the fact that taking references on unaligned fields is UB. The current approach to field accesses in derived code: - Normal case: `&self.0` - In a packed struct that derives `Copy`: `&{self.0}` - In a packed struct that doesn't derive `Copy`: `&self.0` Plus, we disallow deriving any builtin traits other than `Default` for any packed generic type, because it's possible that there might be misaligned fields. This is a fairly broad restriction. Plus, we disallow deriving any builtin traits other than `Default` for most packed types that don't derive `Copy`. (The exceptions are those where the alignments inherently satisfy the packing, e.g. in a type with `repr(packed(N))` where all the fields have alignments of `N` or less anyway. Such types are pretty strange, because the `packed` attribute is not having any effect.) This commit introduces a new, simpler approach to field accesses: - Normal case: `&self.0` - In a packed struct: `&{self.0}` In the latter case, this requires that all fields impl `Copy`, which is a new restriction. This means that the following example compiles under the old approach and doesn't compile under the new approach. ``` #[derive(Debug)] struct NonCopy(u8); #[derive(Debug) #[repr(packed)] struct MyType(NonCopy); ``` (Note that the old approach's support for cases like this was brittle. Changing the `u8` to a `u16` would be enough to stop it working. So not much capability is lost here.) However, the other constraints from the old rules are removed. We can now derive builtin traits for packed generic structs like this: ``` trait Trait { type A; } #[derive(Hash)] #[repr(packed)] pub struct Foo<T: Trait>(T, T::A); ``` To allow this, we add a `T: Copy` bound in the derived impl and a `T::A: Copy` bound in where clauses. So `T` and `T::A` must impl `Copy`. We can now also derive builtin traits for packed structs that don't derive `Copy`, so long as the fields impl `Copy`: ``` #[derive(Hash)] #[repr(packed)] pub struct Foo(u32); ``` This includes types that hand-impl `Copy` rather than deriving it, such as the following, that show up in winapi-0.2: ``` #[derive(Clone)] #[repr(packed)] struct MyType(i32); impl Copy for MyType {} ``` The new approach is simpler to understand and implement, and it avoids the need for the `unsafe_derive_on_repr_packed` check. One exception is required for backwards-compatibility: we allow `[u8]` fields for now. There is a new lint for this, `byte_slice_in_packed_struct_with_derive`.
2023-01-28Auto merge of #103659 - clubby789:improve-partialord-derive, r=nagisabors-9/+73
Special-case deriving `PartialOrd` for enums with dataless variants I was able to get slightly better codegen by flipping the derived `PartialOrd` logic for two-variant enums. I also tried to document the implementation of the derive macro to make the special-case logic a little clearer. ```rs #[derive(PartialEq, PartialOrd)] pub enum A<T> { A, B(T) } ``` ```diff impl<T: ::core::cmp::PartialOrd> ::core::cmp::PartialOrd for A<T> { #[inline] fn partial_cmp( &self, other: &A<T>, ) -> ::core::option::Option<::core::cmp::Ordering> { let __self_tag = ::core::intrinsics::discriminant_value(self); let __arg1_tag = ::core::intrinsics::discriminant_value(other); - match ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(&__self_tag, &__arg1_tag) { - ::core::option::Option::Some(::core::cmp::Ordering::Equal) => { - match (self, other) { - (A::B(__self_0), A::B(__arg1_0)) => { - ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(__self_0, __arg1_0) - } - _ => ::core::option::Option::Some(::core::cmp::Ordering::Equal), - } + match (self, other) { + (A::B(__self_0), A::B(__arg1_0)) => { + ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(__self_0, __arg1_0) } - cmp => cmp, + _ => ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(&__self_tag, &__arg1_tag), } } } ``` Godbolt: [Current](https://godbolt.org/z/GYjEzG1T8), [New](https://godbolt.org/z/GoK78qx15) I'm not sure how common a case comparing two enums like this (such as `Option`) is, and if it's worth the slowdown of adding a special case to the derive. If it causes overall regressions it might be worth just manually implementing this for `Option`.
2023-01-27Relax ordering rules for `asm!` operandsAmanieu d'Antras-31/+4
The `asm!` and `global_asm!` macros require their operands to appear strictly in the following order: - Template strings - Positional operands - Named operands - Explicit register operands - `clobber_abi` - `options` This is overly strict and can be inconvienent when building complex `asm!` statements with macros. This PR relaxes the ordering requirements as follows: - Template strings must still come before all other operands. - Positional operands must still come before named and explicit register operands. - Named and explicit register operands can be freely mixed. - `options` and `clobber_abi` can appear in any position.
2023-01-27Replace format flags u32 by enums and bools.Mara Bos-2/+11
2023-01-26Auto merge of #106745 - m-ou-se:format-args-ast, r=oli-obkbors-605/+11
Move format_args!() into AST (and expand it during AST lowering) Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/541 This moves FormatArgs from rustc_builtin_macros to rustc_ast_lowering. For now, the end result is the same. But this allows for future changes to do smarter things with format_args!(). It also allows Clippy to directly access the ast::FormatArgs, making things a lot easier. This change turns the format args types into lang items. The builtin macro used to refer to them by their path. After this change, the path is no longer relevant, making it easier to make changes in `core`. This updates clippy to use the new language items, but this doesn't yet make clippy use the ast::FormatArgs structure that's now available. That should be done after this is merged.
2023-01-21Auto merge of #106884 - clubby789:fieldless-enum-debug, r=michaelwoeristerbors-42/+124
Simplify `derive(Debug)` output for fieldless enums Fixes #106875
2023-01-19Special case `derive(Debug)` for fieldless enumsclubby789-2/+49
2023-01-19Add enum for fieldless unificationclubby789-43/+78
2023-01-17Remove double spaces after dots in commentsMaybe Waffle-4/+4
2023-01-15Special case deriving `PartialOrd` for certain enum layoutsclubby789-9/+73
2023-01-15allow negative numeric literals in `concat!`Ezra Shaw-1/+14
2023-01-12Update comment explaining format_args!() expansion.Mara Bos-4/+4
2023-01-12Expand format_args!() in rust_ast_lowering.Mara Bos-601/+7
2023-01-02Update format.rsGimbles-1/+1
2022-12-28Rename `Rptr` to `Ref` in AST and HIRNilstrieb-7/+6
The name makes a lot more sense, and `ty::TyKind` calls it `Ref` already as well.