| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
cleanup: remove unused ability to have LLVM null-terminate const strings
(and the copied function in rustc_codegen_gcc)
Noticed this while writing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94450#issuecomment-1059687348.
r? `@nagisa`
|
|
Currently some `Allocation`s are interned, some are not, and it's very
hard to tell at a use point which is which.
This commit introduces `ConstAllocation` for the known-interned ones,
which makes the division much clearer. `ConstAllocation::inner()` is
used to get the underlying `Allocation`.
In some places it's natural to use an `Allocation`, in some it's natural
to use a `ConstAllocation`, and in some places there's no clear choice.
I've tried to make things look as nice as possible, while generally
favouring `ConstAllocation`, which is the type that embodies more
information. This does require quite a few calls to `inner()`.
The commit also tweaks how `PartialOrd` works for `Interned`. The
previous code was too clever by half, building on `T: Ord` to make the
code shorter. That caused problems with deriving `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
for `ConstAllocation`, so I changed it to build on `T: PartialOrd`,
which is slightly more verbose but much more standard and avoided the
problems.
|
|
|
|
See #91867 for more information.
|
|
|
|
fix
fix
Remove more refs and clones
fix
more
fix
|
|
|
|
A custom reimplementation of LLVMConstInBoundsGEP2 is used, since the
LLVM contains a declaration of LLVMConstInBoundsGEP2 but not the
implementation.
|
|
Scalar methods
|
|
infallible
This resolves all the problems we had around "normalizing" the representation of a Scalar in case it carries a Pointer value: we can just use Pointer if we want to have a value taht we are sure is already normalized.
|
|
|
|
These docs were very out of date and misleading. They even said that
they codegen'd the *AST*!
For some reason, the `rustc_codegen_ssa::base` docs were exactly
identical to the `rustc_codegen_llvm::base` docs. They didn't really
make sense, because they had LLVM-specific information even though
`rustc_codegen_ssa` is supposed to be somewhat generic. So I removed
them as they were misleading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|