| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
[cleanup] [llvm backend] Prevent creating the same `Instance::mono` multiple times
Just a little thing I came across while going through the code.
r? ```@oli-obk```
|
|
|
|
This makes sure that &[] is just as efficient as indirecting through
unsafe code (from_raw_parts). No new stable guarantee is intended about
whether or not we do this, this is just an optimization.
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we need from the `ConstAllocation`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
splitting it.
This should make the diff easier to read, as this commit does no functional changes at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also add some `dcx` methods to types that wrap `TyCtxt`, for easier
access.
|
|
use c literals in compiler and library
Relands refreshed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111647
|
|
is immutable
|
|
str replacements
|
|
`x clippy compiler -Aclippy::all -Wclippy::needless_borrow --fix`.
Then I had to remove a few unnecessary parens and muts that were exposed
now.
|
|
`LLVMConstZext` recently got deleted, and it turns out (thanks to @nikic
for knowing!) that this is dead code. Tests all pass for me without this
logic, and per nikic:
> We always generate constants in "relocatable bag of bytes"
> representation, so you're never going to get a plain bool.
So this should be a safe thing to do.
r? @nikic
@rustbot label: +llvm-main
|
|
|
|
cleanup: remove pointee types
This can't be merged until the oldest LLVM version we support uses opaque pointers, which will be the case after #114148. (Also note `-Cllvm-args="-opaque-pointers=0"` can technically be used in LLVM 15, though I don't think we should support that configuration.)
I initially hoped this would provide some minor perf win, but in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105412#issuecomment-1341224450 it had very little impact, so this is only valuable as a cleanup.
As a followup, this will enable #96242 to be resolved.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label S-blocked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit a17561ffc90c900cb7d0e96b00c6381244764ef7.
|
|
use c literals in compiler and library
Use c literals #108801 in compiler and library
currently blocked on:
* <strike>rustfmt: don't know how to format c literals</strike> nope, nightly one works.
* <strike>bootstrap</strike>
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` blocked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...and remove it from `PointeeInfo`, which isn't meant for this.
There are still various places (marked with FIXMEs) that assume all pointers
have the same size and alignment. Fixing this requires parsing non-default
address spaces in the data layout string, which will be done in a followup.
|
|
|
|
This ensures that the error is printed even for unused variables,
as well as unifying the handling between the LLVM and GCC backends.
This also fixes unusual behavior around exported Rust-defined variables
with linkage attributes. With the previous behavior, it appears to be
impossible to define such a variable such that it can actually be imported
and used by another crate. This is because on the importing side, the
variable is required to be a pointer, but on the exporting side, the
type checker rejects static variables of pointer type because they do
not implement `Sync`. Even if it were possible to import such a type, it
appears that code generation on the importing side would add an unexpected
additional level of pointer indirection, which would break type safety.
This highlighted that the semantics of linkage on Rust-defined variables
is different to linkage on foreign items. As such, we now model the
difference with two different codegen attributes: linkage for Rust-defined
variables, and import_linkage for foreign items.
This change gives semantics to the test
src/test/ui/linkage-attr/auxiliary/def_illtyped_external.rs which was
previously expected to fail to compile. Therefore, convert it into a
test that is expected to successfully compile.
The update to the GCC backend is speculative and untested.
|
|
Prevent DllImport from being attached to DSOLocal definitions in the
LLVM IR. The combination makes no sense, since definitions local to the
compilation unit will never be imported from external objects.
Additionally, LLVM will refuse the IR if it encounters the
combination (introduced in [1]):
if (GV.hasDLLImportStorageClass())
Assert(!GV.isDSOLocal(),
"GlobalValue with DLLImport Storage is dso_local!", &GV);
Right now, codegen-llvm will only apply DllImport to constants and rely
on call-stubs for functions. Hence, we simply extend the codegen of
constants to skip DllImport for any local definitions.
This was discovered when switching the EFI targets to the static
relocation model [2]. With this fixed, we can start another attempt at
this.
[1] https://smlnj-gitlab.cs.uchicago.edu/manticore/llvm/commit/509132b368efed10bbdad825403f45e9cf1d6e38
[2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101656
|
|
interpret: support for per-byte provenance
Also factors the provenance map into its own module.
The third commit does the same for the init mask. I can move it in a separate PR if you prefer.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2181
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and
ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value
which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the
disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not
correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage
pointer value.
If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see
what is happening:
*lib.obj*:
```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2 notype External | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```
*bin.obj*:
```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF notype External | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```
The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the
declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result,
linking the files generates a warning from lld:
> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]
and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.
To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and
thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern
item in LLVM IR.
|
|
They don't seem particularly useful as I don't expect
native libraries to change frequently.
|
|
|
|
by module
|
|
|
|
|
|
make vtable pointers entirely opaque
This implements the scheme discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/338: vtable pointers should be considered entirely opaque and not even readable by Rust code, similar to function pointers.
- We have a new kind of `GlobalAlloc` that symbolically refers to a vtable.
- Miri uses that kind of allocation when generating a vtable.
- The codegen backends, upon encountering such an allocation, call `vtable_allocation` to obtain an actually dataful allocation for this vtable.
- We need new intrinsics to obtain the size and align from a vtable (for some `ptr::metadata` APIs), since direct accesses are UB now.
I had to touch quite a bit of code that I am not very familiar with, so some of this might not make much sense...
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
Only compile #[used] as llvm.compiler.used for ELF targets
This returns `#[used]` to how it worked prior to the LLVM 13 update. The intention is not that this is a stable promise.
I'll add tests later today. The tests will test things that we don't actually promise, though.
It's a deliberately small patch, mostly comments. And assuming it's reviewed and lands in time, IMO it should at least be considered for uplifting to beta (so that it can be in 1.59), as the change broke many crates in the ecosystem, even if they are relying on behavior that is not guaranteed.
# Background
LLVM has two ways of preventing removal of an unused variable: `llvm.compiler.used`, which must be present in object files, but allows the linker to remove the value, and `llvm.used` which is supposed to apply to the linker as well, if possible.
Prior to LLVM 13, `llvm.used` and `llvm.compiler.used` were the same on ELF targets, although they were different elsewhere. Prior to our update to LLVM 13, we compiled `#[used]` using `llvm.used` unconditionally, even though we only ever promised behavior like `llvm.compiler.used`.
In LLVM 13, ELF targets gained some support for preventing linker removal of `llvm.used` via the SHF_RETAIN section flag. This has some compatibility issues though: Concretely: some older versions `ld.gold` (specifically ones prior to v2.36, released in Jan 2021) had a bug where it would fail to place a `#[used] #[link_section = ".init_array"]` static in between `__init_array_start`/`__init_array_end`, leading to code that does this failing to run a static constructor. This is technically not a thing we guarantee will work, is a common use case, and is needed in `libstd` (for example, to get access to `std::env::args()` even if Rust does not control `main`, such as when in a `cdylib` crate).
As a result, when updating to LLVM 13, we unconditionally switched to using `llvm.compiler.used`, which mirror the guarantees we make for `#[used]` and doesn't require the latest ld.gold. Unfortunately, this happened to break quite a bit of things in the ecosystem, as non-ELF targets had come to rely on `#[used]` being slightly stronger. In particular, there are cases where it will even break static constructors on these targets[^initinit] (and in fact, breaks way more use cases, as Mach-O uses special sections as an interface to the OS/linker/loader in many places).
As a result, we only switch to `llvm.compiler.used` on ELF[^elfish] targets. The rationale here is:
1. It is (hopefully) identical to the semantics we used prior to the LLVM13 update as prior to that update we unconditionally used `llvm.used`, but on ELF `llvm.used` was the same as `llvm.compiler.used`.
2. It seems to be how Clang compiles this, and given that they have similar (but stronger) compatibility promises, that makes sense.
[^initinit]: For Mach-O targets: It is not always guaranteed that `__DATA,__mod_init_func` is a GC root if it does not have the `S_MOD_INIT_FUNC_POINTERS` flag which we cannot add. In most cases, when ld64 transformed this section into `__DATA_CONST,__mod_init_func` it gets applied, but it's not clear that that is intentional (let alone guaranteed), and the logic is complex enough that it probably happens sometimes, and people in the wild report it occurring.
[^elfish]: Actually, there's not a great way to tell if it's ELF, so I've approximated it.
This is pretty ad-hoc and hacky! We probably should have a firmer set of guarantees here, but this change should relax the pressure on coming up with that considerably, returning it to previous levels.
---
Unsure who should review so leaving it open, but for sure CC `@nikic`
|
