| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
replace copypasted ModuleLlvm::parse
replaced code same as in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/bd36e69d2533ee750e2d805915b8ca88d2825e0f/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/lib.rs#L426-L445
except before error message was emitted via `write::llvm_err`, which returned other error kind, but it still ok?
|
|
Rename `BitSet` to `DenseBitSet`
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` as you requested this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134438#discussion_r1890659739 after such a confusion.
This PR renames `BitSet` to `DenseBitSet` to make it less obvious as the go-to solution for bitmap needs, as well as make its representation (and positives/negatives) clearer. It also expands the comments there to hopefully make it clearer when it's not a good fit, with some alternative bitsets types.
(This migrates the subtrees cg_gcc and clippy to use the new name in separate commits, for easier review by their respective owners, but they can obvs be squashed)
|
|
add `-Zmin-function-alignment`
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
This PR adds the `-Zmin-function-alignment=<align>` flag, that specifies a minimum alignment for all* functions.
### Motivation
This feature is requested by RfL [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128830):
> i.e. the equivalents of `-fmin-function-alignment` ([GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-fmin-function-alignment_003dn), Clang does not support it) / `-falign-functions` ([GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-falign-functions), [Clang](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang1-falign-functions)).
>
> For the Linux kernel, the behavior wanted is that of GCC's `-fmin-function-alignment` and Clang's `-falign-functions`, i.e. align all functions, including cold functions.
>
> There is [`feature(fn_align)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232), but we need to do it globally.
### Behavior
The `fn_align` feature does not have an RFC. It was decided at the time that it would not be necessary, but maybe we feel differently about that now? In any case, here are the semantics of this flag:
- `-Zmin-function-alignment=<align>` specifies the minimum alignment of all* functions
- the `#[repr(align(<align>))]` attribute can be used to override the function alignment on a per-function basis: when `-Zmin-function-alignment` is specified, the attribute's value is only used when it is higher than the value passed to `-Zmin-function-alignment`.
- the target may decide to use a higher value (e.g. on x86_64 the minimum that LLVM generates is 16)
- The highest supported alignment in rust is `2^29`: I checked a bunch of targets, and they all emit the `.p2align 29` directive for targets that align functions at all (some GPU stuff does not have function alignment).
*: Only with `build-std` would the minimum alignment also be applied to `std` functions.
---
cc `@ojeda`
r? `@workingjubilee` you were active on the tracking issue
|
|
This should make it clearer that this bitset is dense, with the
advantages and disadvantages that it entails.
|
|
|
|
Adds `#[rustc_force_inline]` which is similar to always inlining but
reports an error if the inlining was not possible, and which always
attempts to inline annotated items, regardless of optimisation levels.
It can only be applied to free functions to guarantee that the MIR
inliner will be able to resolve calls.
|
|
llvm: Ignore error value that is always false
See llvm/llvm-project#121851
For LLVM 20+, this function (`renameModuleForThinLTO`) has no return value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a signature which allowed an error value people were handling.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
Wait a moment before approving while the llvm-main infrastructure picks it up.
|
|
Add support for wasm exception handling to Emscripten target
This is a draft because we need some additional setting for the Emscripten target to select between the old exception handling and the new exception handling. I don't know how to add a setting like that, would appreciate advice from Rust folks. We could maybe choose to use the new exception handling if `Ctarget-feature=+exception-handling` is passed? I tried this but I get errors from llvm so I'm not doing it right.
|
|
See llvm/llvm-project#121851
For LLVM 20+, this function (`renameModuleForThinLTO`) has no return
value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a
signature which allowed an error value people were handling.
|
|
Gated behind an unstable `-Z emscripten-wasm-eh` flag
|
|
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135115 (cg_llvm: Use constants for DWARF opcodes, instead of FFI calls)
- #135118 (Clarified the documentation on `core::iter::from_fn` and `core::iter::successors`)
- #135121 (Mark `slice::reverse` unstably const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Add a notion of "some ABIs require certain target features"
I think I finally found the right shape for the data and checks that I recently added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133417, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134337: we have a notion of "this ABI requires the following list of target features, and it is incompatible with the following list of target features". Both `-Ctarget-feature` and `#[target_feature]` are updated to ensure we follow the rules of the ABI. This removes all the "toggleability" stuff introduced before, though we do keep the notion of a fully "forbidden" target feature -- this is needed to deal with target features that are actual ABI switches, and hence are needed to even compute the list of required target features.
We always explicitly (un)set all required and in-conflict features, just to avoid potential trouble caused by the default features of whatever the base CPU is. We do this *before* applying `-Ctarget-feature` to maintain backward compatibility; this poses a slight risk of missing some implicit feature dependencies in LLVM but has the advantage of not breaking users that deliberately toggle ABI-relevant target features. They get a warning but the feature does get toggled the way they requested.
For now, our logic supports x86, ARM, and RISC-V (just like the previous logic did). Unsurprisingly, RISC-V is the nicest. ;)
As a side-effect this also (unstably) allows *enabling* `x87` when that is harmless. I used the opportunity to mark SSE2 as required on x86-64, to better match the actual logic in LLVM and because all x86-64 chips do have SSE2. This infrastructure also prepares us for requiring SSE on x86-32 when we want to use that for our ABI (and for float semantics sanity), see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133611, but no such change is happening in this PR.
r? `@workingjubilee`
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `gimli` crate is already a dependency of `thorin-dwp`, which is already a
dependency of `rustc_codegen_ssa`.
|
|
|
|
[Debuginfo] Force enum `DISCR_*` to `static const u64` to allow for inspection via LLDB
see [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/317568-t-compiler.2Fwg-debugging/topic/Revamping.20Debuginfo/near/486614878) for more info.
This change mainly helps `*-msvc` debugged with LLDB. Currently, LLDB cannot inspect `static` struct fields, so the intended visualization for enums is only borderline functional, and niche enums with ranges of discriminant cannot be determined at all .
LLDB *can* inspect `static const` values (though for whatever reason, non-enum/non-u64 consts don't work).
This change adds the `LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateQualifiedType` to the rust FFI layer to wrap the discr type with a `const` modifier, as well as forcing all generated integer enum `DISCR_*` values to be u64's. Those values will only ever be used by debugger visualizers anyway, so it shouldn't be a huge deal, but I left a fixme comment for it just in case.. The `tag` also still properly reflects the discriminant type, so no information is lost.
|
|
Range metadata was disabled for amdgpu due to a backend bug. I did not
encounter any problems when removing the workaround to enable range
metadata (tried compiling `core` and `alloc`), so I assume this has
been fixed in LLVM in the last years.
Remove the workaround to re-enable range metadata.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ABI target feature check
|
|
|
|
`SBTypeStaticField::GetConstantValue()`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was missed when replacing the usage of LLVM for generating import
libraries.
|
|
coverage: Store coverage source regions as `Span` until codegen (take 2)
This is an attempt to re-land #133418:
> Historically, coverage spans were converted into line/column coordinates during the MIR instrumentation pass.
> This PR moves that conversion step into codegen, so that coverage spans spend most of their time stored as Span instead.
> In addition to being conceptually nicer, this also reduces the size of coverage mappings in MIR, because Span is smaller than 4x u32.
That PR was reverted by #133608, because in some circumstances not covered by our test suite we were emitting coverage metadata that was causing `llvm-cov` to exit with an error (#133606).
---
The implementation here is *mostly* the same, but adapted for subsequent changes in the relevant code (e.g. #134163).
I believe that the changes in #134163 should be sufficient to prevent the problem that required the original PR to be reverted. But I haven't been able to reproduce the original breakage in a regression test, and the `llvm-cov` error message is extremely unhelpful, so I can't completely rule out the possibility of this breaking again.
r? jieyouxu (reviewer of the original PR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In codegen, a used function with `FunctionCoverageInfo` but no mappings has
historically indicated a bug. However, that will no longer be the case after
moving some fallible span-processing steps into codegen.
|
|
This will avoid confusion with actual `Span` spans.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Camille Gillot <gillot.camille@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-export more `rustc_span::symbol` things from `rustc_span`.
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from `rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`, and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers to `rustc_span::`. This is a 300+ net line of code reduction, mostly because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to one.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
|
|
coverage: Dismantle `map_data.rs` by moving its responsibilities elsewhere
This is a series of incremental changes that combine to let us get rid of `coverageinfo/map_data.rs`, by moving all of its responsibilities into more appropriate places.
Some of the notable consequences are:
- We once again build the per-CGU file table on the fly while preparing individual covfun records, instead of building the whole table up-front. The up-front approach was introduced by #117042 to work around various other problems in generating the covmap/covfun records, but subsequent cleanups have made that approach no longer necessary.
- Expression conversion and mapping-region conversion are now performed directly in `mapgen::covfun`, which should make future changes easier.
- We no longer insert unused function instances into the same map that is also used to track used function instances. This helps to decouple the handling of used vs unused functions.
---
There should be no meaningful change to compiler output. The file table is no longer sorted, because reordering it would invalidate the file indices stored in individual covfun records, but the table order should still be deterministic (albeit arbitrary).
There are some subsequent cleanups that I intend to investigate, but this is enough change for one PR.
|
|
This patch dismantles what was left of `FunctionCoverage` in `map_data.rs`,
replaces `function_coverage_map` with a set, and overhauls how we prepare
covfun records for unused functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The checks in `is_eligible_for_coverage` include `is_fn_like`, but will also
exclude various function-like things that cannot possibly have coverage
instrumentation.
|
|
|
|
reject aarch64 target feature toggling that would change the float ABI
~~Stacked on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099. Only the last two commits are new.~~
The first new commit lays the groundwork for separately controlling whether a feature may be enabled or disabled. The second commit uses that to make it illegal to *disable* the `neon` feature (which is only possible via `-Ctarget-feature`, and so the new check just adds a warning). Enabling the `neon` feature remains allowed on targets that don't disable `neon` or `fp-armv8`, which is all our built-in targets. This way, the entire PR is not a breaking change.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131058 for hardfloat targets (together with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133102 which fixed it for softfloat targets).
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344.
|
