| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix Access Violation when using lld & ThinLTO on windows-msvc
Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage pointer value.
If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see what is happening:
*lib.obj*:
```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2 notype External | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```
*bin.obj*:
```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF notype External | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```
The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result, linking the files generates a warning from lld:
> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]
and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.
To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern item in LLVM IR.
Fixes #81408
|
|
|
|
`CompiledModule` should not think a DWARF object was emitted when a
bitcode-only compilation has happened, this can confuse archive file
creation (which expects to create an archive containing non-existent dwo
files).
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
|
|
LLVM 16: Update RISCV data layout
The RISCV data layout was changed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/974e2e690b4024c2677dde26cc76ec31e0047c1d.
This updates all `riscv64*` targets, though I don't really know what the difference between the `gc` and `imac` ones is.
Passes `x test codegen` at LLVM head and with the currently bundled LLVM version. Without this patch, some tests fail with:
> error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/context.rs:192:13: data-layout for target `riscv64gc-unknown-none-elf`, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n64-S128`, differs from LLVM target's `riscv64` default layout, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moved type_array function to rustc_codegen_ssa::BaseTypeMethods trait.
This allows using normal alloca function to create arrays as suggested in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104022.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
|
|
LLVM 16: Switch to using MemoryEffects
This adapts the compiler to the changes required by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/304f1d59ca41872c094def3aee0a8689df6aa398.
AFAICT, `WriteOnly` isn't used by the compiler, all `ReadNone` uses were migrated and the remaining use of `ReadOnly` is only for function parameters.
To simplify the FFI, this PR uses an enum to represent `MemoryEffects` across the FFI boundary, which then gets mapped to the matching static factory method when constructing the attribute.
Fixes #103961.
`@rustbot` label +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
|
|
|
|
asm: Work around LLVM bug on AArch64
Upstream issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58384
LLVM gets confused if we assign a 32-bit value to a 64-bit register, so pass the 32-bit register name to LLVM in that case.
|
|
asm: Match clang behavior for inlateout fixed register operands
We have 2 options for representing LLVM constraints for `inlateout` operands on a fixed register (e.g. `r0`): `={r0},0` or `={r0},{r0}`.
This PR changes the behavior to the latter, which matches the behavior of Clang since https://reviews.llvm.org/D87279.
|
|
Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and
ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value
which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the
disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not
correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage
pointer value.
If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see
what is happening:
*lib.obj*:
```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2 notype External | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```
*bin.obj*:
```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF notype External | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```
The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the
declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result,
linking the files generates a warning from lld:
> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]
and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.
To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and
thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern
item in LLVM IR.
|
|
Upstream issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58384
LLVM gets confused if we assign a 32-bit value to a 64-bit register, so
pass the 32-bit register name to LLVM in that case.
|
|
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes
`#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like
`#[global_allocator]`.
The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by
the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom`
function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call
`__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.
This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with
`default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the
alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if
it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from
linking since it was not called.
This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of
`default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
|
|
Don't use usub.with.overflow intrinsic
The canonical form of a usub.with.overflow check in LLVM are separate sub + icmp instructions, rather than a usub.with.overflow intrinsic. Using usub.with.overflow will generally result in worse optimization potential.
The backend will attempt to form usub.with.overflow when it comes to actual instruction selection. This is not fully reliable, but I believe this is a better tradeoff than using the intrinsic in IR.
Fixes #103285.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The canonical form of a usub.with.overflow check in LLVM are
separate sub + icmp instructions, rather than a usub.with.overflow
intrinsic. Using usub.with.overflow will generally result in worse
optimization potential.
The backend will attempt to form usub.with.overflow when it comes
to actual instruction selection. This is not fully reliable, but
I believe this is a better tradeoff than using the intrinsic in
IR.
Fixes #103285.
|
|
They don't seem particularly useful as I don't expect
native libraries to change frequently.
|
|
We have 2 options for representing LLVM constraints for `inlateout`
operands on a fixed register (e.g. `r0`): `={r0},0` or `={r0},{r0}`.
This PR changes the behavior to the latter, which matches the behavior
of Clang since https://reviews.llvm.org/D87279.
|
|
More dupe word typos
I only picked those changes (from the regex search) that I am pretty certain doesn't change meaning and is just a typo fix. Do correct me if any fix is undesirable and I can revert those. Thanks.
|
|
fix a typo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove `-Ztime`
Because it has a lot of overlap with `-Ztime-passes` but is generally less useful. Plus some related cleanups.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
r? `@davidtwco`
|
|
The compiler currently has `-Ztime` and `-Ztime-passes`. I've used
`-Ztime-passes` for years but only recently learned about `-Ztime`.
What's the difference? Let's look at the `-Zhelp` output:
```
-Z time=val -- measure time of rustc processes (default: no)
-Z time-passes=val -- measure time of each rustc pass (default: no)
```
The `-Ztime-passes` description is clear, but the `-Ztime` one is less so.
Sounds like it measures the time for the entire process?
No. The real difference is that `-Ztime-passes` prints out info about passes,
and `-Ztime` does the same, but only for a subset of those passes. More
specifically, there is a distinction in the profiling code between a "verbose
generic activity" and an "extra verbose generic activity". `-Ztime-passes`
prints both kinds, while `-Ztime` only prints the first one. (It took me
a close reading of the source code to determine this difference.)
In practice this distinction has low value. Perhaps in the past the "extra
verbose" output was more voluminous, but now that we only print stats for a
pass if it exceeds 5ms or alters the RSS, `-Ztime-passes` is less spammy. Also,
a lot of the "extra verbose" cases are for individual lint passes, and you need
to also use `-Zno-interleave-lints` to see those anyway.
Therefore, this commit removes `-Ztime` and the associated machinery. One thing
to note is that the existing "extra verbose" activities all have an extra
string argument, so the commit adds the ability to accept an extra argument to
the "verbose" activities.
|
|
Enable doctests in compiler/ crates
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99144
|
|
resolve error when attempting to link a universal library on macOS
Previously attempting to link universal libraries into libraries (but not binaries) would produce an error that "File too small to be an archive". This works around this by invoking `lipo -thin` to extract a library for the target platform when passed a univeral library.
Fixes #55235
It's worth acknowledging that this implementation is kind of a horrible hack. Unfortunately I don't know how to do anything better, hopefully this PR will be a jumping off point.
|
|
Previously attempting to link universal libraries into libraries (but not binaries) would produce an error that "File too small to be an archive". This works around this by using `object` to extract a library for the target platform when passed a univeral library.
Fixes #55235
|
|
Some more cleanup for rustc_codegen_ssa
With the aim to make non-LLVM like backends, like Cranelift, easier to support using cg_ssa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declare `main` as visibility hidden on targets that default to hidden.
On targets with `default_hidden_visibility` set, which is currrently just WebAssembly, declare the generated `main` function with visibility hidden. This makes it consistent with clang's WebAssembly target, where `main` is just a user function that gets the same visibility as any other user function, which is hidden on WebAssembly unless explicitly overridden.
This will help simplify use cases which in the future may want to automatically wasm-export all visibility-"default" symbols. `main` isn't intended to be wasm-exported, and marking it hidden prevents it from being wasm-exported in that scenario.
|
|
Some codegen backends are not able to apply callsite attrs after the fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLVM [D131158] changed the SystemZ data layout to always set 64-bit
vector alignment, which used to be conditional on the "vector" feature.
[D131158]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On targets with `default_hidden_visibility` set, which is currrently
just WebAssembly, declare the generated `main` function with visibility
hidden. This makes it consistent with clang's WebAssembly target, where
`main` is just a user function that gets the same visibility as any
other user function, which is hidden on WebAssembly unless explicitly
overridden.
This will help simplify use cases which in the future may want to
automatically wasm-export all visibility-"default" symbols. `main` isn't
intended to be wasm-exported, and marking it hidden prevents it from
being wasm-exported in that scenario.
|
