| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infer `Lld::No` linker hint when the linker stem is a generic compiler driver
This PR basically reverts the temporary solution in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113631 to a more long-term solution.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
In [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113631#issuecomment-1634598238), you had ideas about a long-term solution:
> I wonder what a good non-temporary solution for the inference would look like.
>
> * If the default is `(Cc::No, Lld::Yes)` (e.g. `rust-lld`)
>
> * and we switch to some specific platform compiler (e.g. `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc`), should we change to `Lld::No`? Maybe yes?
> * and we switch to some non-default but generic compiler `-C linker=clang`? Then maybe not?
>
> * If the default is `(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` (e.g. future x86_64 linux with default LLD)
>
> * and we switch to some specific platform compiler (e.g. `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc`), should we change to `Lld::No`? Maybe yes?
> * and we switch to some non-default but generic compiler `-C linker=clang`? Then maybe not?
>
I believe that we should infer the `Lld::No` linker hint for any `-Clinker` override, and all the cases above:
- the linker drivers have their own defaults, so in my mind `-Clinker` is a signal to use its default linker / flavor, rather than ours or the target's. In the case of generic compilers, it's more likely than not going to be `Lld::No`. I would expect this to be the case in general, even when including platform-specific compilers.
- the guess will be wrong if the linker driver uses lld by default (and we also don't want to search for `-fuse-ld` link args), but will work in the more common cases. And the minority of other cases can fix the wrong guess by opting into the precise linker flavor.
- this also ensures backwards-compatibility: today, even on targets with an lld default and overriding the linker, rustc will not use lld. That includes `thumbv6m-none-eabi` where issue #113597 happened.
It looks like the simplest option, and the one with least churn: we maintain the current behavior in ambiguous cases.
I've tested that this works on #113597, as expected from the failure.
(I also have a no-std `run-make` test using a custom target json spec: basically simulating a future `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` using an lld flavor by default, to check that e.g. `-Clinker=clang` doesn't use lld. I could add that test to this PR, but IIUC such a custom target requires `cargo -Z build-std` and we have no tests depending on this cargo feature yet. Let me know if you want to add this test of the linker inference for such targets.)
What do you think ?
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 2b61a5e17a6bcb552889966f8f932aa680826ab6.
|
|
Removes a piece of mutable state.
Follow up to #114578.
|
|
Removes a piece of mutable state.
Follow up to #114578.
|
|
pnkfelix:dont-export-no-mangle-from-proc-macros-issue-99978, r=bjorn3
Restrict linker version script of proc-macro crates to just its two symbols
Restrict linker version script of proc-macro crates to just the two symbols of each proc-macro crate.
The main known effect of doing this is to stop including `#[no_mangle]` symbols in the linker version script.
Background:
The combination of a proc-macro crate with an import of another crate that itself exports a no_mangle function was broken for a period of time, because:
* In PR #99944 we stopped exporting no_mangle symbols from proc-macro crates; proc-macro crates have a very limited interface and are meant to be treated as a blackbox to everything except rustc itself. However: he constructed linker version script still referred to them, but resolving that discrepancy was left as a FIXME in the code, tagged with issue #99978.
* In PR #108017 we started telling the linker to check (via the`--no-undefined-version` linker invocation flag) that every symbol referenced in the "linker version script" is provided as linker input. So the unresolved discrepancy from #99978 started surfacing as a compile-time error (e.g. #111888).
Fix #111888
Fix #99978.
|
|
inferiorhumanorgans:rustc-codegen-ssa-duplicate-export, r=wesleywiser
Avoid exporting __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic more than once.
Exporting `__rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic` multiple times causes `ld.gold` to balk with: `error: version script assignment of to symbol __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic failed: symbol not defined`
Specifically this breaks builds of 1.70.0 and newer on DragonFly and YoctoProject with `ld.gold`. Builds with `ld.bfd` and `lld` should be unaffected.
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/708194/
|
|
unconditional logic otherwise.
|
|
rustc_codegen_ssa::back::linker::exported_symbols to only export the two symbols that proc-macros need.
|
|
|
|
Exporting `__rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic` multiple times
causes ld.gold to balk with: `error: version script assignment of to
symbol __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic failed: symbol not
defined`
Specifically this breaks builds on DragonFly and YoctoProject with
ld.gold. Builds with ld.bfd should be unaffected.
|
|
remove repetitive words
|
|
Signed-off-by: cui fliter <imcusg@gmail.com>
|
|
This function has some shared code for the thin LTO and fat LTO cases,
but those cases have so little in common that it's actually clearer to
treat them fully separately.
|
|
PR #112946 tweaked the naming of LLVM threads, but messed things up
slightly, resulting in threads on Windows having names like `optimize
module {} regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.0`.
This commit removes the extraneous `{} `.
|
|
It makes things a little clearer.
|
|
|
|
The main loop has a *very* complex condition, which includes two
mentions of `codegen_state`. The body of the loop then immediately
switches on the `codegen_state`.
I find it easier to understand if it's a `loop` and we check for exit
conditions after switching on `codegen_state`. We end up with a tiny bit
of code duplication, but it's clear that (a) we never exit in the
`Ongoing` case, (b) we exit in the `Completed` state only if several
things are true (and there's interaction with LTO there), and (c) we
exit in the `Aborted` state if a couple of things are true. Also, the
exit conditions are all simple conjunctions.
|
|
This loop condition involves `codegen_state`, `work_items`, and
`running_with_own_token`. But the body of the loop cannot modify
`codegen_state`, so repeatedly checking it is unnecessary.
|
|
The two functions are alway called together. This commit factors out the
repeated code.
|
|
`CodegenContext` is immutable except for the `worker` field - we clone
`CodegenContext` in multiple places, changing the `worker` field each
time. It's simpler to move the `worker` field out of `CodegenContext`.
|
|
This is useful when profiling with a profiler like Samply.
|
|
|
|
The `Worker` is unnecessary, and just makes it longer than necessary.
|
|
It took me some time to understand how the main thread can lend a
jobserver token to an LLVM thread. This commit renames a couple of
things to make it clearer.
- Rename the `LLVMing` variant as `Lending`, because that is a clearer
description of what is happening.
- Rename `running` as `running_with_own_token`, which makes it clearer
that there might be one additional LLVM thread running (with a loaned
token). Also add a comment to its definition.
|
|
- Thin and fat LTO can't happen together.
- `NeedsLink` and (non-allocator) `Compiled` work item results can't
happen together.
|
|
And rename the `Compiled` variant as `Finished`, because that name makes
it clearer there is nothing left to do, contrasting nicely with the
`Needs*` variants.
|
|
It has a single callsite, and provides little value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support `--print KIND=PATH` command line syntax
As is already done for `--emit KIND=PATH` and `-L KIND=PATH`.
In the discussion of #110785, it was pointed out that `--print KIND=PATH` is nicer than trying to apply the single global `-o` path to `--print`'s output, because in general there can be multiple print requests within a single rustc invocation, and anyway `-o` would already be used for a different meaning in the case of `link-args` and `native-static-libs`.
I am interested in using `--print cfg=PATH` in Buck2. Currently Buck2 works around the lack of support for `--print KIND=PATH` by [indirecting through a Python wrapper script](https://github.com/facebook/buck2/blob/d43cf3a51a31f00be2c2248e78271b0fef0452b4/prelude/rust/tools/get_rustc_cfg.py) to redirect rustc's stdout into the location dictated by the build system.
From skimming Cargo's usages of `--print`, it definitely seems like it would benefit from `--print KIND=PATH` too. Currently it is working around the lack of this by inserting `--crate-name=___ --print=crate-name` so that it can look for a line containing `___` as a delimiter between the 2 other `--print` informations it actually cares about. This is commented as a "HACK" and "abuse". https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/31eda6f7c360d9911f853b3014e057db61238f3e/src/cargo/core/compiler/build_context/target_info.rs#L242 (FYI `@weihanglo` as you dealt with this recently in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/11633.)
Mentioning reviewers active in #110785: `@fee1-dead` `@jyn514` `@bjorn3`
|
|
Resurrect: rustc_llvm: Add a -Z `print-codegen-stats` option to expose LLVM statistics.
This resurrects PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000, which has sat idle for a while. And I want to see the effect of stack-move optimizations on LLVM (like https://reviews.llvm.org/D153453) :).
I have applied the changes requested by `@oli-obk` and `@nagisa` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000#discussion_r1014625377 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000#discussion_r1014642482 in the latest commits.
r? `@oli-obk`
-----
LLVM has a neat [statistics](https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-statistic-class-stats-option) feature that tracks how often optimizations kick in. It's very handy for optimization work. Since we expose the LLVM pass timings, I thought it made sense to expose the LLVM statistics too.
-----
(Edit: fix broken link
(Edit2: fix segmentation fault and use malloc
If `rustc` is built with
```toml
[llvm]
assertions = true
```
Then you can see like
```
rustc +stage1 -Z print-codegen-stats -C opt-level=3 tmp.rs
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
3 aa - Number of MayAlias results
193 aa - Number of MustAlias results
531 aa - Number of NoAlias results
...
```
And the current default build emits only
```
$ rustc +stage1 -Z print-codegen-stats -C opt-level=3 tmp.rs
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
$
```
This might be better to emit the message to tell assertion flag necessity, but now I can't find how to do that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=pnkfelix,petrochenkov
Verify that all crate sources are in sync
This ensures that rustc will not attempt to link against a cdylib as if it is a rust dylib when an rlib for the same crate is available. Previously rustc didn't actually check if any further formats of a crate which has been loaded are of the same version and if they are actually valid. This caused a cdylib to be interpreted as rust dylib as soon as the corresponding rlib was loaded. As cdylibs don't export any rust symbols, linking would fail if rustc decides to link against the cdylib rather than the rlib.
Two crates depended on the previous behavior by separately compiling a test crate as both rlib and dylib. These have been changed to capture their original spirit to the best of my ability while still working when rustc verifies that all crates are in sync. It is unlikely that build systems depend on the current behavior and in any case we are taking a lot of measures to ensure that any change to either the source or the compilation options (including crate type) results in rustc rejecting it as incompatible. We merely didn't do this check here for now obsolete perf reasons.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/10786
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82151
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82972
Closes https://github.com/bevy-cheatbook/bevy-cheatbook/issues/114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement rust-lang/compiler-team#578.
When an ICE is encountered on nightly releases, the new rustc panic
handler will also write the contents of the backtrace to disk. If any
`delay_span_bug`s are encountered, their backtrace is also added to the
file. The platform and rustc version will also be collected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It replaces `(Linkage, Visibility)`, making the code nicer. Plus the
next commit will add another field.
|
|
LLVM has a neat [statistics] feature that tracks how often optimizations kick
in. It's very handy for optimization work. Since we expose the LLVM pass
timings, I thought it made sense to expose the LLVM statistics too.
[statistics]: https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-statistic-class-stats-option
|
|
De-duplicate consecutive libs when printing native-static-libs
This PR adds a de-duplicate step just before printing the `native-static-libs`.
This step de-duplicates all the consecutive libs based only on the relevant comparison elements (this exclude spans, ast elements, ...).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113209
|
|
|
|
make MCP510 behavior opt-in to avoid conflicts between the CLI and target flavors
Fixes #113597, which contains more details on how this happens through the code, and showcases an unexpected `Gnu(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` flavor.
#112910 added support to use `lld` when the flavor requests it, but didn't explicitly do so only when using `-Clink-self-contained=+linker` or one of the unstable `-Clinker-flavor`s.
The problem: some targets have a `lld` linker and flavor, e.g. `thumbv6m-none-eabi` from that issue. Users can override the linker but there are no linker flavors precise enough to describe the linker opting out of lld: when using `-Clinker=arm-none-eabi-gcc`, we infer this is a `Cc::Yes` linker flavor, but the `lld` component is unknown and therefore defaulted to the target's linker flavor, `Lld::Yes`.
<details>
<summary>Walkthrough of how this happens</summary>
The linker flavor used is a mix between what can be inferred from the CLI (`-C linker`) and the target's default linker flavor:
- there is no linker flavor on the CLI (and that also offers another workaround on nightly: `-C linker-flavor=gnu-cc -Zunstable-options`), so it will have to be inferred [from here](https://github.com/lqd/rust/blob/5dac6b320be868f898a3c753934eabc79ff2e406/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/link.rs#L1334-L1336) to [here](https://github.com/lqd/rust/blob/5dac6b320be868f898a3c753934eabc79ff2e406/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/link.rs#L1321-L1327).
- in [`infer_linker_hints`](https://github.com/lqd/rust/blob/5dac6b320be868f898a3c753934eabc79ff2e406/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/mod.rs#L320-L352) `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc` infers a `Some(Cc::Yes)` cc hint, and no hint about lld.
- the target's `linker_flavor` is combined in `with_cli_hints` with these hints. We have our `Cc::Yes`, but there is no hint about lld, [so the target's flavor `lld` component is used](https://github.com/lqd/rust/blob/5dac6b320be868f898a3c753934eabc79ff2e406/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/mod.rs#L356-L358). It's [`Gnu(Cc::No, Lld::Yes)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/993deaa0bf8bab9dd3eadfd1fbeb093328e95afe/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/thumb_base.rs#L35).
- so we now have our `Gnu(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` flavor
</details>
This results in a `Gnu(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` flavor on a non-lld linker, causing an additional unexpected `-fuse-ld=lld` argument to be passed.
I don't know if this target defaulting to `rust-lld` is expected, but until MCP510's new linker flavor are stable, when people will be able to describe their linker/flavor accurately, this PR keeps the stable behavior of not doing anything when the linker/flavor on the CLI unexpectedly conflict with the target's.
I've tested this on a `no_std` `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc -C link-arg=-nostartfiles --target thumbv6m-none-eabi` example, trying to simulate one of `cortex-m`'s test mentioned in issue #113597 (I don't know how to build a local complete `thumbv6m-none-eabi` toolchain to run the exact test), and checked that `-fuse-lld` was indeed gone and the error disappeared.
r? `````@petrochenkov`````
|
