| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Add an intrinsic for `ptr::metadata`
The follow-up to #123840, so we can remove `PtrComponents` and `PtrRepr` from libcore entirely (well, after a bootstrap update).
As discussed in <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/189540-t-compiler.2Fwg-mir-opt/topic/.60ptr_metadata.60.20in.20MIR/near/435637808>, this introduces `UnOp::PtrMetadata` taking a raw pointer and returning the associated metadata value.
By no longer going through a `union`, this should also help future PRs better optimize pointer operations.
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
|
|
This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On
librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k dynamic relocations from the
output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather
than having a relocated pointer included.
This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites.
That's hard to avoid without changing the vtable format (e.g., to use a
pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the
dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is
cheap at runtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove `Rvalue::CheckedBinaryOp`
Zulip conversation: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/189540-t-compiler.2Fwg-mir-opt/topic/intrinsics.20vs.20binop.2Funop/near/438729996>
cc `@RalfJung`
While it's a draft,
r? ghost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I added `PlaceValue` in 123775, but kept that one line-by-line simple because it touched so many places.
This goes through to add more helpers & docs, and change some `PlaceRef` to `PlaceValue` where the type didn't need to be included.
No behaviour changes.
|
|
Avoid `alloca`s in codegen for simple `mir::Aggregate` statements
The core idea here is to remove the abstraction penalty of simple newtypes in codegen.
Even something simple like constructing a
```rust
#[repr(transparent)] struct Foo(u32);
```
forces an `alloca` to be generated in nightly right now.
Certainly LLVM can optimize that away, but it would be nice if it didn't have to.
Quick example:
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
pub struct Transparent32(u32);
#[no_mangle]
pub fn make_transparent(x: u32) -> Transparent32 {
let a = Transparent32(x);
a
}
```
on nightly we produce <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/zcvoM79ae>
```llvm
define noundef i32 `@make_transparent(i32` noundef %x) unnamed_addr #0 {
%a = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, ptr %a, align 4
%0 = load i32, ptr %a, align 4, !noundef !3
ret i32 %0
}
```
but after this PR we produce
```llvm
define noundef i32 `@make_transparent(i32` noundef %x) unnamed_addr #0 {
start:
ret i32 %x
}
```
(even before the optimizer runs).
|
|
Make `Ty::builtin_deref` just return a `Ty`
Nowhere in the compiler are we using the mutability part of the `TyAndMut` that we used to return.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop `llvm.expect`ing assert terminators
We're putting `llvm.expect` calls before the <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/mir/enum.TerminatorKind.html#variant.Assert> terminators.
But we don't need them. One of the arms is always to a panic function that's marked `#[cold]`, which is `cold` <https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#function-attributes> in LLVM, which
> When computing edge weights, basic blocks post-dominated by a cold function call are also considered to be cold; and, thus, given low weight.
So even without us emitting the extra intrinsic call, LLVM knows what to expect for the `br`. Thus we can save the (small) effort of emitting it and then LLVM optimizing it out.
r? compiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`#[collapse_debuginfo]`
`-Z debug-macros` is "stabilized" by enabling it by default and removing.
`-Z collapse-macro-debuginfo` is stabilized as `-C collapse-macro-debuginfo`.
It now supports all typical boolean values (`parse_opt_bool`) in addition to just yes/no.
Default value of `collapse_debuginfo` was changed from `false` to `external` (i.e. collapsed if external, not collapsed if local).
`#[collapse_debuginfo]` attribute without a value is no longer supported to avoid guessing the default.
|
|
Stop using LLVM struct types for alloca
The alloca type has no semantic meaning, only the size (and alignment, but we specify it explicitly) matter. Using `[N x i8]` is a more direct way to specify that we want `N` bytes, and avoids relying on LLVM's struct layout. It is likely that a future LLVM version will change to an untyped alloca representation.
Split out from #121577.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
Add simple async drop glue generation
This is a prototype of the async drop glue generation for some simple types. Async drop glue is intended to behave very similar to the regular drop glue except for being asynchronous. Currently it does not execute synchronous drops but only calls user implementations of `AsyncDrop::async_drop` associative function and awaits the returned future. It is not complete as it only recurses into arrays, slices, tuples, and structs and does not have same sensible restrictions as the old `Drop` trait implementation like having the same bounds as the type definition, while code assumes their existence (requires a future work).
This current design uses a workaround as it does not create any custom async destructor state machine types for ADTs, but instead uses types defined in the std library called future combinators (deferred_async_drop, chain, ready_unit).
Also I recommend reading my [explainer](https://zetanumbers.github.io/book/async-drop-design.html).
This is a part of the [MCP: Low level components for async drop](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/727) work.
Feature completeness:
- [x] `AsyncDrop` trait
- [ ] `async_drop_in_place_raw`/async drop glue generation support for
- [x] Trivially destructible types (integers, bools, floats, string slices, pointers, references, etc.)
- [x] Arrays and slices (array pointer is unsized into slice pointer)
- [x] ADTs (enums, structs, unions)
- [x] tuple-like types (tuples, closures)
- [ ] Dynamic types (`dyn Trait`, see explainer's [proposed design](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#async-drop-glue-for-dyn-trait))
- [ ] coroutines (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123948)
- [x] Async drop glue includes sync drop glue code
- [x] Cleanup branch generation for `async_drop_in_place_raw`
- [ ] Union rejects non-trivially async destructible fields
- [ ] `AsyncDrop` implementation requires same bounds as type definition
- [ ] Skip trivially destructible fields (optimization)
- [ ] New [`TyKind::AdtAsyncDestructor`](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#adt-async-destructor-types) and get rid of combinators
- [ ] [Synchronously undroppable types](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#exclusively-async-drop)
- [ ] Automatic async drop at the end of the scope in async context
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do not add prolog for variadic naked functions
fixes #99858
|
|
fixes #99858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`OperandRef` does)
|
|
I added this back in 111999, but I no longer think it's a good idea
- It had to get scaled back to only power-of-two things to not break a bunch of targets
- LLVM seems to be getting better at memcpy removal anyway
- Introducing vector instructions has seemed to sometimes (115515) make autovectorization worse
So this removes it from the codegen crates entirely, and instead just tries to use <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_codegen_ssa/traits/builder/trait.BuilderMethods.html#method.typed_place_copy> instead of direct `memcpy` so things will still use load/store for immediates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rename `expose_addr` to `expose_provenance`
`expose_addr` is a bad name, an address is just a number and cannot be exposed. The operation is actually about the provenance of the pointer.
This PR thus changes the name of the method to `expose_provenance` without changing its return type. There is sufficient precedence for returning a useful value from an operation that does something else without the name indicating such, e.g. [`Option::insert`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/option/enum.Option.html#method.insert) and [`MaybeUninit::write`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/mem/union.MaybeUninit.html#method.write).
Returning the address is merely convenient, not a fundamental part of the operation. This is implied by the fact that integers do not have provenance since
```rust
let addr = ptr.addr();
ptr.expose_provenance();
let new = ptr::with_exposed_provenance(addr);
```
must behave exactly like
```rust
let addr = ptr.expose_provenance();
let new = ptr::with_exposed_provenance(addr);
```
as the result of `ptr.expose_provenance()` and `ptr.addr()` is the same integer. Therefore, this PR removes the `#[must_use]` annotation on the function and updates the documentation to reflect the important part.
~~An alternative name would be `expose_provenance`. I'm not at all opposed to that, but it makes a stronger implication than we might want that the provenance of the pointer returned by `ptr::with_exposed_provenance`[^1] is the same as that what was exposed, which is not yet specified as such IIUC. IMHO `expose` does not make that connection.~~
A previous version of this PR suggested `expose` as name, libs-api [decided on](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122964#issuecomment-2033194319) `expose_provenance` to keep the symmetry with `with_exposed_provenance`.
CC `@RalfJung`
r? libs-api
[^1]: I'm using the new name for `from_exposed_addr` suggested by #122935 here.
|
|
Fix some unsoundness with PassMode::Cast ABI
Fixes #122617
Reviewable commit-by-commit. More info in each commit message.
|
|
|
|
rename ptr::from_exposed_addr -> ptr::with_exposed_provenance
As discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/136281-t-opsem/topic/To.20expose.20or.20not.20to.20expose/near/427757066).
The old name, `from_exposed_addr`, makes little sense as it's not the address that is exposed, it's the provenance. (`ptr.expose_addr()` stays unchanged as we haven't found a better option yet. The intended interpretation is "expose the provenance and return the address".)
The new name nicely matches `ptr::without_provenance`.
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123198 (Add fn const BuildHasherDefault::new)
- #123226 (De-LLVM the unchecked shifts [MCP#693])
- #123302 (Make sure to insert `Sized` bound first into clauses list)
- #123348 (rustdoc: add a couple of regression tests)
- #123362 (Check that nested statics in thread locals are duplicated per thread.)
- #123368 (CFI: Support non-general coroutines)
- #123375 (rustdoc: synthetic auto trait impls: accept unresolved region vars for now)
- #123378 (Update sysinfo to 0.30.8)
Failed merges:
- #123349 (Fix capture analysis for by-move closure bodies)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Add `Ord::cmp` for primitives as a `BinOp` in MIR
Update: most of this OP was written months ago. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118310#issuecomment-2016940014 below for where we got to recently that made it ready for review.
---
There are dozens of reasonable ways to implement `Ord::cmp` for integers using comparison, bit-ops, and branches. Those differences are irrelevant at the rust level, however, so we can make things better by adding `BinOp::Cmp` at the MIR level:
1. Exactly how to implement it is left up to the backends, so LLVM can use whatever pattern its optimizer best recognizes and cranelift can use whichever pattern codegens the fastest.
2. By not inlining those details for every use of `cmp`, we drastically reduce the amount of MIR generated for `derive`d `PartialOrd`, while also making it more amenable to MIR-level optimizations.
Having extremely careful `if` ordering to μoptimize resource usage on broadwell (#63767) is great, but it really feels to me like libcore is the wrong place to put that logic. Similarly, using subtraction [tricks](https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#CopyIntegerSign) (#105840) is arguably even nicer, but depends on the optimizer understanding it (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/73417) to be practical. Or maybe [bitor is better than add](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/representing-in-ir/67369/2?u=scottmcm)? But maybe only on a future version that [has `or disjoint` support](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-or-disjoint-flag/75036?u=scottmcm)? And just because one of those forms happens to be good for LLVM, there's no guarantee that it'd be the same form that GCC or Cranelift would rather see -- especially given their very different optimizers. Not to mention that if LLVM gets a spaceship intrinsic -- [which it should](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Suboptimal.20inlining.20in.20std.20function.20.60binary_search.60/near/404250586) -- we'll need at least a rustc intrinsic to be able to call it.
As for simplifying it in Rust, we now regularly inline `{integer}::partial_cmp`, but it's quite a large amount of IR. The best way to see that is with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/8811efa88b25b5e41d63850e6047e8257c677858#diff-d134c32d028fbe2bf835fef2df9aca9d13332dd82284ff21ee7ebf717bfa4765R113 -- I added a new pre-codegen MIR test for a simple 3-tuple struct, and this PR change it from 36 locals and 26 basic blocks down to 24 locals and 8 basic blocks. Even better, as soon as the construct-`Some`-then-match-it-in-same-BB noise is cleaned up, this'll expose the `Cmp == 0` branches clearly in MIR, so that an InstCombine (#105808) can simplify that to just a `BinOp::Eq` and thus fix some of our generated code perf issues. (Tracking that through today's `if a < b { Less } else if a == b { Equal } else { Greater }` would be *much* harder.)
---
r? `@ghost`
But first I should check that perf is ok with this
~~...and my true nemesis, tidy.~~
|
|
This is just one part of the MCP, but it's the one that IMHO removes the most noise from the standard library code.
Seems net simpler this way, since MIR already supported heterogeneous shifts anyway, and thus it's not more work for backends than before.
|
|
Codegen const panic messages as function calls
This skips emitting extra arguments at every callsite (of which there
can be many). For a librustc_driver build with overflow checks enabled,
this cuts 0.7MB from the resulting shared library (see [perf]).
A sample improvement from nightly:
```
leaq str.0(%rip), %rdi
leaq .Lalloc_d6aeb8e2aa19de39a7f0e861c998af13(%rip), %rdx
movl $25, %esi
callq *_ZN4core9panicking5panic17h17cabb89c5bcc999E@GOTPCREL(%rip)
```
to this PR:
```
leaq .Lalloc_d6aeb8e2aa19de39a7f0e861c998af13(%rip), %rdi
callq *_RNvNtNtCsduqIKoij8JB_4core9panicking11panic_const23panic_const_div_by_zero@GOTPCREL(%rip)
```
[perf]: https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=a7e4de13c1785819f4d61da41f6704ed69d5f203&end=64fbb4f0b2d621ff46d559d1e9f5ad89a8d7789b&stat=instructions:u
|
|
Unbox and unwrap the contents of `StatementKind::Coverage`
The payload of coverage statements was historically a structure with several fields, so it was boxed to avoid bloating `StatementKind`.
Now that the payload is a single relatively-small enum, we can replace `Box<Coverage>` with just `CoverageKind`.
This patch also adds a size assertion for `StatementKind`, to avoid accidentally bloating it in the future.
``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
|
|
|
|
CFI: Strip auto traits off Virtual calls
We already use `Instance` at declaration sites when available to glean additional information about possible abstractions of the type in use. This does the same when possible at callsites as well.
The primary purpose of this change is to allow CFI to alter how it generates type information for indirect calls through `Virtual` instances.
This is needed for the "separate machinery" version of my approach to the vtable issues (#122573), because we need to respond differently to a `Virtual` call to the same type as a non-virtual call, specifically [stripping auto traits off the receiver's `Self`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122573/commits/54b15b0c36d4638167732a0542ed0e34ecf17d7c) because there isn't a separate vtable for `Foo` vs `Foo + Send`.
This would also make a more general underlying mechanism that could be used by rcvalle's [proposed drop detection / encoding](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116404/commits/edcd1e20a1a69a8590d8ca47b31634854a40e3fb) if we end up using his approach, as we could condition out on the `def_id` in the CFI code rather than requiring the generating code to explicitly note whether it was calling drop.
|
