about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/traits
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-01-24Rollup merge of #135581 - EnzymeAD:refactor-codgencx, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-2/+0
Separate Builder methods from tcx As part of the autodiff upstreaming we noticed, that it would be nice to have various builder methods available without the TypeContext, which prevents the normal CodegenCx to be passed around between threads. We introduce a SimpleCx which just owns the llvm module and llvm context, to encapsulate them. The previous CodegenCx now implements deref and forwards access to the llvm module or context to it's SimpleCx sub-struct. This gives us a bit more flexibility, because now we can pass (or construct) the SimpleCx in locations where we don't have enough information to construct a CodegenCx, or are not able to pass it around due to the tcx lifetimes (and it not implementing send/sync). This also introduces an SBuilder, similar to the SimpleCx. The SBuilder uses a SimpleCx, whereas the existing Builder uses the larger CodegenCx. I will push updates to make implementations generic (where possible) to be implemented once and work for either of the two. I'll also clean up the leftover code. `call` is a bit tricky, because it requires a tcx, I probably need to duplicate it after all. Tracking: - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
2025-01-24Make CodegenCx and Builder genericManuel Drehwald-2/+0
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
2025-01-22Auto merge of #135674 - scottmcm:assume-better, r=estebankbors-0/+21
Update our range `assume`s to the format that LLVM prefers I found out in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123278#issuecomment-2597440158 that the way I started emitting the `assume`s in #109993 was suboptimal, and as seen in that LLVM issue the way we're doing it -- with two `assume`s sometimes -- can at times lead to CVP/SCCP not realize what's happening because one of them turns into a `ne` instead of conveying a range. So this updates how it's emitted from ``` assume( x >= LOW ); assume( x <= HIGH ); ``` or ``` // (for ranges that wrap the range) assume( (x <= LOW) | (x >= HIGH) ); ``` to ``` assume( (x - LOW) <= (HIGH - LOW) ); ``` so that we don't need multiple `icmp`s nor multiple `assume`s for a single value, and both wrappping and non-wrapping ranges emit the same shape. (And we don't bother emitting the subtraction if `LOW` is zero, since that's trivial for us to check too.)
2025-01-21Treat undef bytes as equal to any other byteOli Scherer-0/+1
2025-01-17Update our range `assume`s to the format that LLVM prefersScott McMurray-0/+21
2025-01-01upstream rustc_codegen_llvm changes for enzyme/autodiffManuel Drehwald-0/+9
2024-12-25rename typed_swap → typed_swap_nonoverlappingRalf Jung-1/+1
2024-12-18Re-export more `rustc_span::symbol` things from `rustc_span`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from `rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good reason. This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`, and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to `rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to one.
2024-12-13Auto merge of #133099 - RalfJung:forbidden-hardfloat-features, r=workingjubileebors-1/+3
forbid toggling x87 and fpregs on hard-float targets Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344, follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129884: The `x87` target feature on x86 and the `fpregs` target feature on ARM must not be disabled on a hardfloat target, as that would change the float ABI. However, *enabling* `fpregs` on ARM is [explicitly requested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130988) as it seems to be useful. Therefore, we need to refine the distinction of "forbidden" target features and "allowed" target features: all (un)stable target features can determine on a per-target basis whether they should be allowed to be toggled or not. `fpregs` then checks whether the current target has the `soft-float` feature, and if yes, `fpregs` is permitted -- otherwise, it is not. (Same for `x87` on x86). Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132351. Since `fpregs` and `x87` can be enabled on some builds and disabled on others, it would make sense that one can query it via `cfg`. Therefore, I made them behave in `cfg` like any other unstable target feature. The first commit prepares the infrastructure, but does not change behavior. The second commit then wires up `fpregs` and `x87` with that new infrastructure. r? `@workingjubilee`
2024-12-11Auto merge of #128004 - folkertdev:naked-fn-asm, r=Amanieubors-0/+7
codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957 Fixes #124375 This implements the approach suggested in the tracking issue: use the existing global assembly infrastructure to emit the body of `#[naked]` functions. The main advantage is that we now have full control over what gets generated, and are no longer dependent on LLVM not sneakily messing with our output (inlining, adding extra instructions, etc). I discussed this approach with `@Amanieu` and while I think the general direction is correct, there is probably a bunch of stuff that needs to change or move around here. I'll leave some inline comments on things that I'm not sure about. Combined with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127853, if both accepted, I think that resolves all steps from the tracking issue. r? `@Amanieu`
2024-12-11generalize 'forbidden feature' concept so that even (un)stable feature can ↵Ralf Jung-1/+3
be invalid to toggle Also rename some things for extra clarity
2024-12-10codegen `#[naked]` functions using `global_asm!`Folkert-0/+7
2024-12-06Remove all threading through of ErrorGuaranteed from the driverbjorn3-8/+2
It was inconsistently done (sometimes even within a single function) and most of the rest of the compiler uses fatal errors instead, which need to be caught using catch_with_exit_code anyway. Using fatal errors instead of ErrorGuaranteed everywhere in the driver simplifies things a bit.
2024-11-27use intra-doc links for CodegenBackend::linkMonadic Cat-1/+1
2024-11-27update comment (codegen_backend -> codegen_crate)Monadic Cat-2/+2
use intra-doc links so there'll be a doc gen fail next time this becomes wrong
2024-11-19move `fn is_item_raw` to `TypingEnv`lcnr-3/+3
2024-11-18use `TypingEnv` when no `infcx` is availablelcnr-7/+9
the behavior of the type system not only depends on the current assumptions, but also the currentnphase of the compiler. This is mostly necessary as we need to decide whether and how to reveal opaque types. We track this via the `TypingMode`.
2024-11-17Likely unlikely fixJiri Bobek-0/+20
2024-11-12Rollup merge of #132702 - 1c3t3a:issue-132615, r=rcvalleMatthias Krüger-0/+1
CFI: Append debug location to CFI blocks Currently we're not appending debug locations to the inserted CFI blocks. This shows up in #132615 and #100783. This change fixes that by passing down the debug location to the CFI type-test generation and appending it to the blocks. Credits also belong to `@jakos-sec` who worked with me on this.
2024-11-11CFI: Append debug location to CFI blocksBastian Kersting-0/+1
2024-11-09Pass owned CodegenResults to link_binarybjorn3-1/+1
After link_binary the temporary files referenced by CodegenResults are deleted, so calling link_binary again with the same CodegenResults should not be allowed.
2024-11-09Add a default implementation for CodegenBackend::linkbjorn3-1/+5
As a side effect this should add raw-dylib support to cg_gcc as the default ArchiveBuilderBuilder that is used implements create_dll_import_lib. I haven't tested if the raw-dylib support actually works however.
2024-11-03compiler: Directly use rustc_abi in codegenJubilee Young-8/+8
2024-10-29compiler: `rustc_abi::Abi` => `BackendRepr`Jubilee Young-2/+2
The initial naming of "Abi" was an awful mistake, conveying wrong ideas about how psABIs worked and even more about what the enum meant. It was only meant to represent the way the value would be described to a codegen backend as it was lowered to that intermediate representation. It was never meant to mean anything about the actual psABI handling! The conflation is because LLVM typically will associate a certain form with a certain ABI, but even that does not hold when the special cases that actually exist arise, plus the IR annotations that modify the ABI. Reframe `rustc_abi::Abi` as the `BackendRepr` of the type, and rename `BackendRepr::Aggregate` as `BackendRepr::Memory`. Unfortunately, due to the persistent misunderstandings, this too is now incorrect: - Scattered ABI-relevant code is entangled with BackendRepr - We do not always pre-compute a correct BackendRepr that reflects how we "actually" want this value to be handled, so we leave the backend interface to also inject various special-cases here - In some cases `BackendRepr::Memory` is a "real" aggregate, but in others it is in fact using memory, and in some cases it is a scalar! Our rustc-to-backend lowering code handles this sort of thing right now. That will eventually be addressed by lifting duplicated lowering code to either rustc_codegen_ssa or rustc_target as appropriate.
2024-10-25coverage: SSA doesn't need to know about `instrprof_increment`Zalathar-8/+0
2024-09-24Auto merge of #130389 - Luv-Ray:LLVMMDNodeInContext2, r=nikicbors-3/+5
llvm: replace some deprecated functions `LLVMMDStringInContext` and `LLVMMDNodeInContext` are deprecated, replace them with `LLVMMDStringInContext2` and `LLVMMDNodeInContext2`. Also replace `Value` with `Metadata` in some function signatures for better consistency.
2024-09-22Reformat using the new identifier sorting from rustfmtMichael Goulet-7/+7
2024-09-19Reorder `ConstMethods`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+7
It's crazy to have the integer methods in something close to random order. The reordering makes the gaps clear: `const_i64`, `const_i128`, `const_isize`, and `const_u16`. I guess they just aren't needed.
2024-09-19replace some deprecated functionsLuv-Ray-3/+5
2024-09-18Rollup merge of #130457 - nnethercote:cleanup-codegen-traits, r=bjorn3Matthias Krüger-127/+79
Cleanup codegen traits The traits governing codegen are quite complicated and hard to follow. This PR cleans them up a bit. r? `@bjorn3`
2024-09-17Clean up formatting.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+9
Reflow overly long comments, plus some minor whitespace improvements.
2024-09-17Rename supertraits of `CodegenMethods`.Nicholas Nethercote-36/+38
Supertraits of `BuilderMethods` are all called `XyzBuilderMethods`. Supertraits of `CodegenMethods` are all called `XyzMethods`. This commit changes the latter to `XyzCodegenMethods`, for consistency.
2024-09-17Move some supertraits outward.Nicholas Nethercote-10/+18
Specifically, put them where they are genuinely required, i.e. the outermost place they can be.
2024-09-17Tweak and explain the `BuilderMethods`/`CodegenMethods` connection.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+6
2024-09-17Remove unneeded bounds from `CodegenMethods` and `BuilderMethods`.Nicholas Nethercote-12/+2
Some of these are pulled in indirectly, e.g. `MiscMethods` via `TypeMethods`.
2024-09-17Rename `{ArgAbi,IntrinsicCall}Methods`.Nicholas Nethercote-9/+9
They both are part of `BuilderMethods`, and so should have `Builder` in their name like all the other traits in `BuilderMethods`.
2024-09-17Remove `BackendTypes` constraint from traits that don't need it.Nicholas Nethercote-6/+2
2024-09-17Remove `Backend`.Nicholas Nethercote-25/+17
It's a trait that aggregates five other traits. But consider the places that use it. - `BuilderMethods`: requires three of the five traits. - `CodegenMethods`: requires zero(!) of the five traits. - `BaseTypeMethods`: requires two of the five traits. - `LayoutTypeMethods`: requires three of the five traits. - `TypeMembershipMethods`: requires one of the five traits. This commit just removes it, which makes everything simpler.
2024-09-17Merge `HasCodegen` into `BuilderMethods`.Nicholas Nethercote-18/+16
It has `Backend` and `Deref` boudns, plus an associated type `CodegenCx`, and it has a single use. This commit "inlines" it into `BuilderMethods`, which makes the complicated backend trait situation a little simpler.
2024-09-17Adjust supertrait of `ArgAbiMethods`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
It only needs `Self::Value` and `Self::Type`, so it can be a subtrait of `BackendTypes`. That is a smaller and simpler trait than `HasCodegen` (which includes `BackendTypes` and a lot more).
2024-09-17Use trait aliases to shorten some code.Nicholas Nethercote-44/+7
2024-09-06Don't leave debug locations for constants sitting on the builder indefinitely.Kyle Huey-0/+1
Because constants are currently emitted *before* the prologue, leaving the debug location on the IRBuilder spills onto other instructions in the prologue and messes up both line numbers as well as the point LLVM chooses to be the prologue end. Example LLVM IR (irrelevant IR elided): Before: define internal { i64, i64 } @_ZN3tmp3Foo18var_return_opt_try17he02116165b0fc08cE(ptr align 8 %self) !dbg !347 { start: %self.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %_0 = alloca [16 x i8], align 8 %residual.dbg.spill = alloca [0 x i8], align 1 #dbg_declare(ptr %residual.dbg.spill, !353, !DIExpression(), !357) store ptr %self, ptr %self.dbg.spill, align 8, !dbg !357 #dbg_declare(ptr %self.dbg.spill, !350, !DIExpression(), !358) After: define internal { i64, i64 } @_ZN3tmp3Foo18var_return_opt_try17h00b17d08874ddd90E(ptr align 8 %self) !dbg !347 { start: %self.dbg.spill = alloca [8 x i8], align 8 %_0 = alloca [16 x i8], align 8 %residual.dbg.spill = alloca [0 x i8], align 1 #dbg_declare(ptr %residual.dbg.spill, !353, !DIExpression(), !357) store ptr %self, ptr %self.dbg.spill, align 8 #dbg_declare(ptr %self.dbg.spill, !350, !DIExpression(), !358) Note in particular how !357 from %residual.dbg.spill's dbg_declare no longer falls through onto the store to %self.dbg.spill. This fixes argument values at entry when the constant is a ZST (e.g. <Option as Try>::Residual). This fixes #130003 (but note that it does *not* fix issues with argument values and non-ZST constants, which emit their own stores that have debug info on them, like #128945).
2024-08-15Auto merge of #128861 - khuey:mir-inlining-parameters-debuginfo, r=wesleywiserbors-1/+2
Rework MIR inlining debuginfo so function parameters show up in debuggers. Line numbers of multiply-inlined functions were fixed in #114643 by using a single DISubprogram. That, however, triggered assertions because parameters weren't deduplicated. The "solution" to that in #115417 was to insert a DILexicalScope below the DISubprogram and parent all of the parameters to that scope. That fixed the assertion, but debuggers (including gdb and lldb) don't recognize variables that are not parented to the subprogram itself as parameters, even if they are emitted with DW_TAG_formal_parameter. Consider the program: ```rust use std::env; #[inline(always)] fn square(n: i32) -> i32 { n * n } #[inline(never)] fn square_no_inline(n: i32) -> i32 { n * n } fn main() { let x = square(env::vars().count() as i32); let y = square_no_inline(env::vars().count() as i32); println!("{x} == {y}"); } ``` When making a release build with debug=2 and rustc 1.82.0-nightly (8b3870784 2024-08-07) ``` (gdb) r Starting program: /ephemeral/tmp/target/release/tmp [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Breakpoint 1, tmp::square () at src/main.rs:5 5 n * n (gdb) info args No arguments. (gdb) info locals n = 31 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 2, tmp::square_no_inline (n=31) at src/main.rs:10 10 n * n (gdb) info args n = 31 (gdb) info locals No locals. ``` This issue is particularly annoying because it removes arguments from stack traces. The DWARF for the inlined function looks like this: ``` < 2><0x00002132 GOFF=0x00002132> DW_TAG_subprogram DW_AT_linkage_name _ZN3tmp6square17hc507052ff3d2a488E DW_AT_name square DW_AT_decl_file 0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs DW_AT_decl_line 0x00000004 DW_AT_type 0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56> DW_AT_inline DW_INL_inlined < 3><0x00002142 GOFF=0x00002142> DW_TAG_lexical_block < 4><0x00002143 GOFF=0x00002143> DW_TAG_formal_parameter DW_AT_name n DW_AT_decl_file 0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs DW_AT_decl_line 0x00000004 DW_AT_type 0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56> < 4><0x0000214e GOFF=0x0000214e> DW_TAG_null < 3><0x0000214f GOFF=0x0000214f> DW_TAG_null ``` That DW_TAG_lexical_block inhibits every debugger I've tested from recognizing 'n' as a parameter. This patch removes the additional lexical scope. Parameters can be easily deduplicated by a tuple of their scope and the argument index, at the trivial cost of taking a Hash + Eq bound on DIScope.
2024-08-12Rework MIR inlining debuginfo so function parameters show up in debuggers.Kyle Huey-1/+2
Line numbers of multiply-inlined functions were fixed in #114643 by using a single DISubprogram. That, however, triggered assertions because parameters weren't deduplicated. The "solution" to that in #115417 was to insert a DILexicalScope below the DISubprogram and parent all of the parameters to that scope. That fixed the assertion, but debuggers (including gdb and lldb) don't recognize variables that are not parented to the subprogram itself as parameters, even if they are emitted with DW_TAG_formal_parameter. Consider the program: use std::env; fn square(n: i32) -> i32 { n * n } fn square_no_inline(n: i32) -> i32 { n * n } fn main() { let x = square(env::vars().count() as i32); let y = square_no_inline(env::vars().count() as i32); println!("{x} == {y}"); } When making a release build with debug=2 and rustc 1.82.0-nightly (8b3870784 2024-08-07) (gdb) r Starting program: /ephemeral/tmp/target/release/tmp [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Breakpoint 1, tmp::square () at src/main.rs:5 5 n * n (gdb) info args No arguments. (gdb) info locals n = 31 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 2, tmp::square_no_inline (n=31) at src/main.rs:10 10 n * n (gdb) info args n = 31 (gdb) info locals No locals. This issue is particularly annoying because it removes arguments from stack traces. The DWARF for the inlined function looks like this: < 2><0x00002132 GOFF=0x00002132> DW_TAG_subprogram DW_AT_linkage_name _ZN3tmp6square17hc507052ff3d2a488E DW_AT_name square DW_AT_decl_file 0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs DW_AT_decl_line 0x00000004 DW_AT_type 0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56> DW_AT_inline DW_INL_inlined < 3><0x00002142 GOFF=0x00002142> DW_TAG_lexical_block < 4><0x00002143 GOFF=0x00002143> DW_TAG_formal_parameter DW_AT_name n DW_AT_decl_file 0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs DW_AT_decl_line 0x00000004 DW_AT_type 0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56> < 4><0x0000214e GOFF=0x0000214e> DW_TAG_null < 3><0x0000214f GOFF=0x0000214f> DW_TAG_null That DW_TAG_lexical_block inhibits every debugger I've tested from recognizing 'n' as a parameter. This patch removes the additional lexical scope. Parameters can be easily deduplicated by a tuple of their scope and the argument index, at the trivial cost of taking a Hash + Eq bound on DIScope.
2024-08-12Rollup merge of #128978 - compiler-errors:assert-matches, r=jieyouxuGuillaume Gomez-2/+4
Use `assert_matches` around the compiler more It's a useful assertion, especially since it actually prints out the LHS.
2024-08-12Rollup merge of #128537 - Jamesbarford:118980-const-vector, r=RalfJung,nikicGuillaume Gomez-0/+1
const vector passed through to codegen This allows constant vectors using a repr(simd) type to be propagated through to the backend by reusing the functionality used to do a similar thing for the simd_shuffle intrinsic #118209 r​? RalfJung
2024-08-11Use assert_matches around the compilerMichael Goulet-2/+4
2024-08-08Rename struct_tail_erasing_lifetimes to struct_tail_for_codegenMichael Goulet-1/+1
2024-08-08const vector passed to codegenJames Barford-Evans-0/+1
2024-08-04Add `Debug` impls to API types in `rustc_codegen_ssa`Mahmoud Mazouz-1/+1