| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
a bit
- rename mutating functions to be more scary
- add a new raw bytes getter
|
|
|
|
fact about validation failures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
know the `Machine` type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interpret: ensure that Place is never used for a different frame
We store the address where the stack frame stores its `locals`. The idea is that even if we pop and push, or switch to a different thread with a larger number of frames, then the `locals` address will most likely change so we'll notice that problem. This is made possible by some recent changes by `@WaffleLapkin,` where we no longer use `Place` across things that change the number of stack frames.
I made these debug assertions for now, just to make sure this can't cost us any perf.
The first commit is unrelated but it's a one-line comment change so it didn't warrant a separate PR...
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
to address issue 121610.
|
|
miri: add some chance to reuse addresses of previously freed allocations
The hope is that this can help us find ABA issues.
Unfortunately this needs rustc changes so I can't easily run the regular benchmark suite. I used `src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs` as a substitute:
```
Before:
Benchmark 1: ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs --args --edition=2021
Time (mean ± σ): 9.570 s ± 0.013 s [User: 9.279 s, System: 0.290 s]
Range (min … max): 9.561 s … 9.579 s 2 runs
After:
Benchmark 1: ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs --args --edition=2021
Time (mean ± σ): 9.698 s ± 0.046 s [User: 9.413 s, System: 0.279 s]
Range (min … max): 9.666 s … 9.731 s 2 runs
```
That's a ~1.3% slowdown, which seems fine to me. I have seen a lot of noise in this style of benchmarking so I don't quite trust this anyway; we can make further experiments in the Miri repo after this migrated there.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will be used in the next commit
|
|
|
|
interpret: do not call machine read hooks during validation
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3347
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
Add tests (and a bit of cleanup) for interior mut handling in promotion and const-checking
Basically these are the parts of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121786 that can be salvaged.
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
|
|
Diagnostic renaming 3
A sequel to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121780.
r? `@davidtwco`
|
|
To match `derive(LintDiagnostic)`.
|
|
To match `derive(Diagnostic)`.
Also rename `into_diagnostic` as `into_diag`.
|
|
Also rename `into_diagnostic_arg` as `into_diag_arg`, and
`NotIntoDiagnosticArg` as `NotInotDiagArg`.
|
|
|
|
MIR printing: print the path of uneval'd const
Currently it just prints `const _` which makes it impossible to say which constant is being referred to.
Also refer to promoteds in a consistent way; previously MIR printing would do
```
promoted[0] in C1: &Option<Cell<i32>> = {
// ...
}
```
Now that should be
```
const C1::promoted[0]: &Option<Cell<i32>> = {
// ...
}
```
We don't seem to have a test for that so I tried it by hand, it seems to work:
```
const main::promoted[12]: &[&str; 3] = {
let mut _0: &[&str; 3];
let mut _1: [&str; 3];
let mut _2: &str;
let mut _3: &str;
let mut _4: &str;
let mut _5: &str;
bb0: {
_3 = const "b";
_2 = &(*_3);
_5 = const "c";
_4 = &(*_5);
_1 = [const "a", move _2, move _4];
_0 = &_1;
return;
}
}
```
|
|
consistent way
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distinguish between library and lang UB in assert_unsafe_precondition
As described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121583#issuecomment-1963168186, `assert_unsafe_precondition` now explicitly distinguishes between language UB (conditions we explicitly optimize on) and library UB (things we document you shouldn't do, and maybe some library internals assume you don't do).
`debug_assert_nounwind` was originally added to avoid the "only at runtime" aspect of `assert_unsafe_precondition`. Since then the difference between the macros has gotten muddied. This totally revamps the situation.
Now _all_ preconditions shall be checked with `assert_unsafe_precondition`. If you have a precondition that's only checkable at runtime, do a `const_eval_select` hack, as done in this PR.
r? RalfJung
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enabled
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweak the way we protect in-place function arguments in interpreters
Use `MPlaceTy` instead of `PlaceTy` in `FnArg` and ignore (copy) locals in an earlier step ("Locals that don't have their address taken are as protected as they can ever be").
This seems to be crucial for tail call support (as they can't refer to caller's locals which are killed when replacing the stack frame).
r? `@RalfJung`
cc `@oli-obk`
see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121273#issuecomment-1980210690
|
|
Use `MPlaceTy` instead of `PlaceTy` in `FnArg` and ignore (copy) locals in an
earlier step ("Locals that don't have their address taken are as protected as
they can ever be").
This seems to be crucial for tail call support (as they can't refer to caller's
locals which are killed when replacing the stack frame).
|
|
r=tmiasko
interpret: update comment about read_discriminant on uninhabited variants
|
|
Don't ICE in CTFE if raw/fn-ptr types differ
Fixes #121688
r? lcnr
|
|
|
|
Add asm goto support to `asm!`
Tracking issue: #119364
This PR implements asm-goto support, using the syntax described in "future possibilities" section of [RFC2873](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2873-inline-asm.html#asm-goto).
Currently I have only implemented the `label` part, not the `fallthrough` part (i.e. fallthrough is implicit). This doesn't reduce the expressive though, since you can use label-break to get arbitrary control flow or simply set a value and rely on jump threading optimisation to get the desired control flow. I can add that later if deemed necessary.
r? ``@Amanieu``
cc ``@ojeda``
|
