| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Add long explanation for E0726
This is the cleaned up version of #87655 with the missing fixes.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61137.
r? `@Urgau`
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 3cfa4def7c87d571bd46d92fed608edf8fad236e, reversing
changes made to 5d8767cb229b097fedb1dd4bd9420d463c37774f.
|
|
Inherit lifetimes for async fn instead of duplicating them.
The current desugaring of `async fn foo<'a>(&usize) -> &u8` is equivalent to
```rust
fn foo<'a, '0>(&'0 usize) -> foo<'static, 'static>::Opaque<'a, '0, '_>;
type foo<'_a, '_0>::Opaque<'a, '0, '1> = impl Future<Output = &'1 u8>;
```
following the RPIT model.
Duplicating all the inherited lifetime parameters and setting the inherited version to `'static` makes lowering more complex and causes issues like #61949. This PR removes the duplication of inherited lifetimes to directly use
```rust
fn foo<'a, '0>(&'0 usize) -> foo<'a, '0>::Opaque<'_>;
type foo<'a, '0>::Opaque<'1> = impl Future<Output = &'1 u8>;
```
following the TAIT model.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61949
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarify error on casting larger integers to char
Closes #91836 with changes to E0604.md and a `span_help`.
|
|
Add Explanation For Error E0772
I've added an error explanation for the error code E0772.
Assists with #61137
|
|
|
|
Transition unsupported naked functions future incompatibility lint into
an error:
* Naked functions must contain a single inline assembly block.
Introduced as future incompatibility lint in 1.50 #79653.
Change into an error fixes a soundness issue described in #32489.
* Naked functions must not use any forms of inline attribute.
Introduced as future incompatibility lint in 1.56 #87652.
|
|
Correct minor typos in some long error code explanations
Just a little nitpick to improve the long explanations of the error codes. 😊
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This usually describes either an error in the compiler itself or some
sort of IO error. Either way, we should report it to the user rather
than just saying "crate not found".
This only gives an error if the crate couldn't be loaded at all - if the
compiler finds another .rlib or .rmeta file which was valid, it will
continue to compile the crate.
Example output:
```
error[E0785]: found invalid metadata files for crate `foo`
--> bar.rs:3:24
|
3 | println!("{}", foo::FOO_11_49[0]);
| ^^^
|
= warning: failed to parse rlib '/home/joshua/test-rustdoc/libfoo.rlib': Invalid archive extended name offset
```
|
|
|
|
Update E0637 description to mention `&` w/o an explicit lifetime name
Deal with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89824#issuecomment-941598647. Another solution would be splitting the error code into two as (I think) it's a bit unclear to users why they have the same error code.
|
|
occurred anymore
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86011 (move implicit `Sized` predicate to end of list)
- #89821 (Add a strange test for `unsafe_code` lint.)
- #89859 (add dedicated error variant for writing the discriminant of an uninhabited enum variant)
- #89870 (Suggest Box::pin when Pin::new is used instead)
- #89880 (Use non-checking TLS relocation in aarch64 asm! sym test.)
- #89885 (add long explanation for E0183)
- #89894 (Remove unused dependencies from rustc_const_eval)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
add long explanation for E0183
Addresses #61137
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 7a62f29f3171767090949778ce0f161e930706b9.
|
|
The test is copied from `src/test/ui/crate-loading/crateresolve1.rs` and
its auxiliary tests. I added it to the `compile_fail` code example check
exemption list since it's hard if not impossible to reproduce this error
in a standalone code example.
|
|
Add long explanation for error E0482
This is longer explanation for error E0482 in the #61137.
Please take a look and leave some feedback!
|
|
|
|
|
|
A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them
to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other
usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used
in that manner.
|
|
Allow simd_shuffle to accept vectors of any length
cc ``@rust-lang/project-portable-simd`` ``@workingjubilee``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #85026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Force warn improvements
As part of stablization of the `--force-warn` option (#86516) I've made the following changes:
* Error when the `warnings` lint group is based to the `--force-warn` option
* Tests have been updated to make it easier to understand the semantics of `--force-warn`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
The code will not emit this warning once box expressions require a sized
type (since that error is emitted earlier in the flow).
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `arbitrary_enum_discriminant`
Closes #60553.
----
## Stabilization Report
_copied from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60553#issuecomment-865922311_
### Summary
Enables a user to specify *explicit* discriminants on arbitrary enums.
Previously, this was hard to achieve:
```rust
#[repr(u8)]
enum Foo {
A(u8) = 0,
B(i8) = 1,
C(bool) = 42,
}
```
Someone would need to add 41 hidden variants in between as a workaround with implicit discriminants.
In conjunction with [RFC 2195](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2195-really-tagged-unions.md), this feature would provide more flexibility for FFI and unsafe code involving enums.
### Test cases
Most tests are in [`src/test/ui/enum-discriminant`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/ui/enum-discriminant), there are two [historical](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/parser/tag-variant-disr-non-nullary.rs) [tests](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/parser/issue-17383.rs) that are now covered by the feature (removed by this pr due to them being obsolete).
### Edge cases
The feature is well defined and does not have many edge cases.
One [edge case](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70509) was related to another unstable feature named `repr128` and is resolved.
### Previous PRs
The [implementation PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60732) added documentation to the Unstable Book, https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1055 was opened as a continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/639.
### Resolution of unresolved questions
The questions are resolved in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60553#issuecomment-511235271.
----
(someone please add `needs-fcp`)
|
|
Expand explanation of E0530
The explanation didn't cover a puzzling case of enum variants missing fields.
|
|
Assign E0784 error code for union expression errors
|
|
Add long error explanation for E0625
For #61137.
|
|
|
|
This commit intends to fill out some of the remaining pieces of the
C-unwind ABI. This has a number of other changes with it though to move
this design space forward a bit. Notably contained within here is:
* On `panic=unwind`, the `extern "C"` ABI is now considered as "may
unwind". This fixes a longstanding soundness issue where if you
`panic!()` in an `extern "C"` function defined in Rust that's actually
UB because the LLVM representation for the function has the `nounwind`
attribute, but then you unwind.
* Whether or not a function unwinds now mainly considers the ABI of the
function instead of first checking the panic strategy. This fixes a
miscompile of `extern "C-unwind"` with `panic=abort` because that ABI
can still unwind.
* The aborting stub for non-unwinding ABIs with `panic=unwind` has been
reimplemented. Previously this was done as a small tweak during MIR
generation, but this has been moved to a separate and dedicated MIR
pass. This new pass will, for appropriate functions and function
calls, insert a `cleanup` landing pad for any function call that may
unwind within a function that is itself not allowed to unwind. Note
that this subtly changes some behavior from before where previously on
an unwind which was caught-to-abort it would run active destructors in
the function, and now it simply immediately aborts the process.
* The `#[unwind]` attribute has been removed and all users in tests and
such are now using `C-unwind` and `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
I think this is largely the last piece of the RFC to implement.
Unfortunately I believe this is still not stabilizable as-is because
activating the feature gate changes the behavior of the existing `extern
"C"` ABI in a way that has no replacement. My thinking for how to enable
this is that we add support for the `C-unwind` ABI on stable Rust first,
and then after it hits stable we change the behavior of the `C` ABI.
That way anyone straddling stable/beta/nightly can switch to `C-unwind`
safely.
|
|
|
