about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_errors/src/diagnostic.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-03-11Rename `AddToDiagnostic` as `Subdiagnostic`.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+7
To match `derive(Subdiagnostic)`. Also rename `add_to_diagnostic{,_with}` as `add_to_diag{,_with}`.
2024-03-11Rename `IntoDiagnostic` as `Diagnostic`.Nicholas Nethercote-14/+14
To match `derive(Diagnostic)`. Also rename `into_diagnostic` as `into_diag`.
2024-03-11Rename `IntoDiagnosticArg` as `IntoDiagArg`.Nicholas Nethercote-8/+8
Also rename `into_diagnostic_arg` as `into_diag_arg`, and `NotIntoDiagnosticArg` as `NotInotDiagArg`.
2024-03-06Add missing `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` attributes.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+31
Prior to the previous commit, `#[rust_lint_diagnostics]` attributes could only be used on methods with an `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagMessage>` parameter. But there are many other nearby diagnostic methods (e.g. `Diag::span`) that don't take such a parameter and should have the attribute. This commit adds the missing attribute to these `Diag` methods. This requires adding some missing `#[allow(rustc::diagnostic_outside_of_impl)]` markers at call sites to these methods.
2024-03-05Adjust `Diag::new` signature.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
Make it use `impl Into<DiagMessage>` like all the other methods nearby.
2024-03-05Rename `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as `SubdiagMessageOp`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
2024-03-05Rename `SubdiagnosticMessage` as `SubdiagMessage`.Nicholas Nethercote-31/+30
2024-03-05Rename `DiagnosticMessage` as `DiagMessage`.Nicholas Nethercote-14/+14
2024-02-29Rollup merge of #121669 - nnethercote:count-stashed-errs-again, r=estebankGuillaume Gomez-5/+3
Count stashed errors again Stashed diagnostics are such a pain. Their "might be emitted, might not" semantics messes with lots of things. #120828 and #121206 made some big changes to how they work, improving some things, but still leaving some problems, as seen by the issues caused by #121206. This PR aims to fix all of them by restricting them in a way that eliminates the "might be emitted, might not" semantics while still allowing 98% of their benefit. Details in the individual commit logs. r? `@oli-obk`
2024-02-29Overhaul how stashed diagnostics work, again.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+3
Stashed errors used to be counted as errors, but could then be cancelled, leading to `ErrorGuaranteed` soundness holes. #120828 changed that, closing the soundness hole. But it introduced other difficulties because you sometimes have to account for pending stashed errors when making decisions about whether errors have occured/will occur and it's easy to overlook these. This commit aims for a middle ground. - Stashed errors (not warnings) are counted immediately as emitted errors, avoiding the possibility of forgetting to consider them. - The ability to cancel (or downgrade) stashed errors is eliminated, by disallowing the use of `steal_diagnostic` with errors, and introducing the more restrictive methods `try_steal_{modify,replace}_and_emit_err` that can be used instead. Other things: - `DiagnosticBuilder::stash` and `DiagCtxt::stash_diagnostic` now both return `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`, which enables the removal of two `delayed_bug` calls and one `Ty::new_error_with_message` call. This is possible because we store error guarantees in `DiagCtxt::stashed_diagnostics`. - Storing the guarantees also saves us having to maintain a counter. - Calls to the `stashed_err_count` method are no longer necessary alongside calls to `has_errors`, which is a nice simplification, and eliminates two more `span_delayed_bug` calls and one FIXME comment. - Tests are added for three of the four fixed PRs mentioned below. - `issue-121108.rs`'s output improved slightly, omitting a non-useful error message. Fixes #121451. Fixes #121477. Fixes #121504. Fixes #121508.
2024-02-29Add a comment about how `IntoDiagnostic` should be impl'd.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+19
2024-02-28Rename `DiagnosticStyledString` as `DiagStyledString`.Nicholas Nethercote-12/+12
2024-02-28Rename `DiagnosticLocation` as `DiagLocation`.Nicholas Nethercote-6/+6
2024-02-28Rename `DiagnosticArg{,Map,Name,Value}` as `DiagArg{,Map,Name,Value}`.Nicholas Nethercote-21/+21
2024-02-28Rename `DiagnosticBuilder` as `Diag`.Nicholas Nethercote-76/+70
Much better! Note that this involves renaming (and updating the value of) `DIAGNOSTIC_BUILDER` in clippy.
2024-02-28Rename `SubDiagnostic` as `Subdiag`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+5
Note the change of the `D` to `d`, to match all the other names that have `Subdiag` in them, such as `SubdiagnosticMessage` and `derive(Subdiagnostic)`.
2024-02-28Rename `Diagnostic` as `DiagInner`.Nicholas Nethercote-19/+19
I started by changing it to `DiagData`, but that didn't feel right. `DiagInner` felt much better.
2024-02-22Overhaul `Diagnostic` args.Nicholas Nethercote-11/+5
First, introduce a typedef `DiagnosticArgMap`. Second, make the `args` field public, and remove the `args` getter and `replace_args` setter. These were necessary previously because the getter had a `#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]` attribute, but that was removed in #120931 when the args were changed from `FxHashMap` to `FxIndexMap`. (All the other `Diagnostic` fields are public.)
2024-02-21Remove some no-longer-needed `pub(crate)` markers.Nicholas Nethercote-10/+5
2024-02-21Merge `diagnostic_builder.rs` into `diagnostic.rs`.Nicholas Nethercote-80/+349
Because: - `diagnostic_builder.rs` is small (282 lines), - `Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder` are closely related types, and - there's already an `impl DiagnosticBuilder` block in `diagnostic.rs`. At the same time, reorder a few of things already in `diagnostic.rs`, e.g. move `struct Diagnostic` just before `impl Diagnostic`. This commit only moves code around. There are no functional changes.
2024-02-20Reduce capabilities of `Diagnostic`.Nicholas Nethercote-58/+154
Currently many diagnostic modifier methods are available on both `Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`. This commit removes most of them from `Diagnostic`. To minimize the diff size, it keeps them within `diagnostic.rs` but changes the surrounding `impl Diagnostic` block to `impl DiagnosticBuilder`. (I intend to move things around later, to give a more sensible code layout.) `Diagnostic` keeps a few methods that it still needs, like `sub`, `arg`, and `replace_args`. The `forward!` macro, which defined two additional methods per call (e.g. `note` and `with_note`), is replaced by the `with_fn!` macro, which defines one additional method per call (e.g. `with_note`). It's now also only used when necessary -- not all modifier methods currently need a `with_*` form. (New ones can be easily added as necessary.) All this also requires changing `trait AddToDiagnostic` so its methods take `DiagnosticBuilder` instead of `Diagnostic`, which leads to many mechanical changes. `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` gains a type parameter `G`. There are three subdiagnostics -- `DelayedAtWithoutNewline`, `DelayedAtWithNewline`, and `InvalidFlushedDelayedDiagnosticLevel` -- that are created within the diagnostics machinery and appended to external diagnostics. These are handled at the `Diagnostic` level, which means it's now hard to construct them via `derive(Diagnostic)`, so instead we construct them by hand. This has no effect on what they look like when printed. There are lots of new `allow` markers for `untranslatable_diagnostics` and `diagnostics_outside_of_impl`. This is because `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` annotations were present on the `Diagnostic` modifier methods, but missing from the `DiagnosticBuilder` modifier methods. They're now present.
2024-02-17Rollup merge of #121085 - davidtwco:always-eager-diagnostics, r=nnethercoteMatthias Krüger-9/+2
errors: only eagerly translate subdiagnostics Subdiagnostics don't need to be lazily translated, they can always be eagerly translated. Eager translation is slightly more complex as we need to have a `DiagCtxt` available to perform the translation, which involves slightly more threading of that context. This slight increase in complexity should enable later simplifications - like passing `DiagCtxt` into `AddToDiagnostic` and moving Fluent messages into the diagnostic structs rather than having them in separate files (working on that was what led to this change). r? ```@nnethercote```
2024-02-15Auto merge of #120931 - chenyukang:yukang-cleanup-hashmap, r=michaelwoeristerbors-6/+3
Clean up potential_query_instability with FxIndexMap and UnordMap From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120485#issuecomment-1916437191 r? `@michaelwoerister`
2024-02-15errors: only eagerly translate subdiagnosticsDavid Wood-9/+2
Subdiagnostics don't need to be lazily translated, they can always be eagerly translated. Eager translation is slightly more complex as we need to have a `DiagCtxt` available to perform the translation, which involves slightly more threading of that context. This slight increase in complexity should enable later simplifications - like passing `DiagCtxt` into `AddToDiagnostic` and moving Fluent messages into the diagnostic structs rather than having them in separate files (working on that was what led to this change). Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
2024-02-14clean up potential_query_instability with FxIndexMap and UnordMapyukang-6/+3
2024-02-13Remove `good_path_delayed_bug`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+1
It's only has a single remaining purpose: to ensure that a diagnostic is printed when `trimmed_def_paths` is used. It's an annoying mechanism: weak, with odd semantics, badly named, and gets in the way of other changes. This commit replaces it with a simpler `must_produce_diag` mechanism, getting rid of a diagnostic `Level` along the way.
2024-02-11Rollup merge of #120272 - ↵Matthias Krüger-0/+11
long-long-float:suppress-suggestions-in-derive-macro, r=oli-obk Suppress suggestions in derive macro close #118809 I suppress warnings inside derive macros. For example, the compiler emits following error by a program described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118809#issuecomment-1852256687 with a suggestion that indicates invalid syntax. ``` error[E0308]: `?` operator has incompatible types --> src/main.rs:3:17 | 3 | #[derive(Debug, Deserialize)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `u32`, found `u64` | = note: `?` operator cannot convert from `u64` to `u32` = note: this error originates in the derive macro `Deserialize` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) help: you can convert a `u64` to a `u32` and panic if the converted value doesn't fit | 3 | #[derive(Debug, Deserialize.try_into().unwrap())] | ++++++++++++++++++++ For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`. error: could not compile `serde_test` (bin "serde_test") due to 2 previous errors ``` In this PR, suggestions to cast are suppressed. ``` error[E0308]: `?` operator has incompatible types --> src/main.rs:3:17 | 3 | #[derive(Debug, Deserialize)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `u32`, found `u64` | = note: `?` operator cannot convert from `u64` to `u32` = note: this error originates in the derive macro `Deserialize` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`. error: could not compile `serde_test` (bin "serde_test") due to 2 previous errors ```
2024-02-11Fix to use for looplong-long-float-8/+7
2024-02-09Check with overlaps_or_adjacentlong-long-float-4/+7
2024-02-08Add `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as a trait alias.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+4
It avoids a lot of repetition.
2024-02-06Check in push_suggestionlong-long-float-0/+9
2024-02-05Split `Level::DelayedBug` in two.Nicholas Nethercote-11/+7
The two kinds of delayed bug have quite different semantics so a stronger conceptual separation is nice. (`is_error` is a good example, because the two kinds have different behaviour.) The commit also moves the `DelayedBug` variant after `Error` in `Level`, to reflect the fact that it's weaker than `Error` -- it might trigger an error but also might not. (The pre-existing `downgrade_to_delayed_bug` function also reflects the notion that delayed bugs are lower/after normal errors.) Plus it condenses some of the comments on `Level` into a table, for easier reading, and introduces `can_be_top_or_sub` to indicate which levels can be used in top-level diagnostics vs. subdiagnostics. Finally, it renames `DiagCtxtInner::span_delayed_bugs` as `DiagCtxtInner::delayed_bugs`. The `span_` prefix is unnecessary because some delayed bugs don't have a span.
2024-02-05Tighten the assertion in `downgrade_to_delayed_bug`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
I.e. `Bug` and `Fatal` level diagnostics are never downgraded.
2024-02-05Make `Diagnostic::is_error` return false for `Level::FailureNote`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
It doesn't affect behaviour, but makes sense with (a) `FailureNote` having `()` as its emission guarantee, and (b) in `Level` the `is_error` levels now are all listed before the non-`is_error` levels.
2024-02-03Use `StringPart` more.Nicholas Nethercote-30/+25
2024-02-03Use `DiagnosticArgName` in a few more places.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
2024-02-03`Diagnostic` cleanupsNicholas Nethercote-17/+1
- `emitted_at` isn't used outside the crate. - `code` and `messages` are public fields, so there's no point have trivial getters/setters for them. - `suggestions` is public, so the comment about "functionality on `Diagnostic`" isn't needed.
2024-02-01Rework `StringPart`.Nicholas Nethercote-20/+16
When there are two possibilities, both of which use a `String`, it's nicer to use a struct than an enum. Especially when mapping the contents into a tuple.
2024-02-01Fit more values into `DiagnosticArgValue::Number`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+4
It contains an `i128`, but when creating them we convert any number outside the range -100..100 to a string, because Fluent uses an `f64`. It's all a bit strange. This commit changes the `i128` to an `i32`, which fits safely in Fluent's `f64`, and removes the -100..100 range check. This means that only integers outside the range of `i32` will be converted to strings.
2024-01-31Don't hash lints differently to non-lints.Nicholas Nethercote-8/+8
`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in #88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.
2024-01-30Remove the second lifetime from `DiagnosticArg`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
Because it's always static. I'm surprised the compiler allowed this unused lifetime without any complaint.
2024-01-30Remove the lifetime from `DiagnosticArgName`.Nicholas Nethercote-8/+4
Because it's always 'static.
2024-01-30Remove the lifetime from `DiagnosticArgValue`.Nicholas Nethercote-19/+13
Because it's almost always static. This makes `impl IntoDiagnosticArg for DiagnosticArgValue` trivial, which is nice. There are a few diagnostics constructed in `compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs` and `compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/errors.rs` that now need symbols converted to `String` with `to_string` instead of `&str` with `as_str`, but that' no big deal, and worth it for the simplifications elsewhere.
2024-01-29Stop using `String` for error codes.Nicholas Nethercote-8/+9
Error codes are integers, but `String` is used everywhere to represent them. Gross! This commit introduces `ErrCode`, an integral newtype for error codes, replacing `String`. It also introduces a constant for every error code, e.g. `E0123`, and removes the `error_code!` macro. The constants are imported wherever used with `use rustc_errors::codes::*`. With the old code, we have three different ways to specify an error code at a use point: ``` error_code!(E0123) // macro call struct_span_code_err!(dcx, span, E0123, "msg"); // bare ident arg to macro call \#[diag(name, code = "E0123")] // string struct Diag; ``` With the new code, they all use the `E0123` constant. ``` E0123 // constant struct_span_code_err!(dcx, span, E0123, "msg"); // constant \#[diag(name, code = E0123)] // constant struct Diag; ``` The commit also changes the structure of the error code definitions: - `rustc_error_codes` now just defines a higher-order macro listing the used error codes and nothing else. - Because that's now the only thing in the `rustc_error_codes` crate, I moved it into the `lib.rs` file and removed the `error_codes.rs` file. - `rustc_errors` uses that macro to define everything, e.g. the error code constants and the `DIAGNOSTIC_TABLES`. This is in its new `codes.rs` file.
2024-01-14Rework how diagnostic lints are stored.Nicholas Nethercote-24/+21
`Diagnostic::code` has the type `DiagnosticId`, which has `Error` and `Lint` variants. Plus `Diagnostic::is_lint` is a bool, which should be redundant w.r.t. `Diagnostic::code`. Seems simple. Except it's possible for a lint to have an error code, in which case its `code` field is recorded as `Error`, and `is_lint` is required to indicate that it's a lint. This is what happens with `derive(LintDiagnostic)` lints. Which means those lints don't have a lint name or a `has_future_breakage` field because those are stored in the `DiagnosticId::Lint`. It's all a bit messy and confused and seems unintentional. This commit: - removes `DiagnosticId`; - changes `Diagnostic::code` to `Option<String>`, which means both errors and lints can straightforwardly have an error code; - changes `Diagnostic::is_lint` to `Option<IsLint>`, where `IsLint` is a new type containing a lint name and a `has_future_breakage` bool, so all lints can have those, error code or not.
2024-01-12Good path bugs are just a flavor of delayed bugMichael Goulet-6/+9
2024-01-11Change how `force-warn` lint diagnostics are recorded.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+10
`is_force_warn` is only possible for diagnostics with `Level::Warning`, but it is currently stored in `Diagnostic::code`, which every diagnostic has. This commit: - removes the boolean `DiagnosticId::Lint::is_force_warn` field; - adds a `ForceWarning` variant to `Level`. Benefits: - The common `Level::Warning` case now has no arguments, replacing lots of `Warning(None)` occurrences. - `rustc_session::lint::Level` and `rustc_errors::Level` are more similar, both having `ForceWarning` and `Warning`.
2024-01-04Remove `is_lint` field from `Level::Error`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+3
Because it's redundant w.r.t. `Diagnostic::is_lint`, which is present for every diagnostic level. `struct_lint_level_impl` was the only place that set the `Error` field to `true`, and it's also the only place that calls `Diagnostic::is_lint()` to set the `is_lint` field.
2024-01-03Fix up `forward!` decls.Nicholas Nethercote-6/+10
- Move comments onto corresponding `Diagnostic` methods. - Make formatting more consistent.
2024-01-03Remove forward for `downgrade_to_delayed_bug`.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+1
It's not used, and doesn't quite fit the general pattern. Also, `Diagnostic::downgrade_to_delayed_bug` doesn't need to return `&mut Self` for the same reason.