| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
useless_format
map_flatten
useless_conversion
needless_bool
filter_next
clone_on_copy
needless_option_as_deref
|
|
|
|
Bootstrap compiler update
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a trait generalizing over the crate root and freshly loaded modules instead
This also makes node IDs used for pre-expansion linting more precise
|
|
|
|
expand: Pick `cfg`s and `cfg_attrs` one by one, like other attributes
This is a rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83354, but without any language-changing parts ~(except for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84110)~, i.e. the attribute expansion order is the same.
This is a pre-requisite for any other changes making cfg attributes closer to regular macro attributes
- Possibly changing their expansion order (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83331)
- Keeping macro backtraces for cfg attributes, or otherwise making them visible after expansion without keeping them in place literally (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84110).
Two exceptions to the "one by one" behavior are:
- cfgs eagerly expanded by `derive` and `cfg_eval`, they are still expanded in a batch, that's by design.
- cfgs at the crate root, they are currently expanded not during the main expansion pass, but before that, during `#![feature]` collection. I'll try to disentangle that logic later in a separate PR.
r? `@Aaron1011`
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
Replace usages of vec![].into_iter with [].into_iter
`[].into_iter` is idiomatic over `vec![].into_iter` because its simpler and faster (unless the vec is optimized away in which case it would be the same)
So we should change all the implementation, documentation and tests to use it.
I skipped:
* `src/tools` - Those are copied in from upstream
* `src/test/ui` - Hard to tell if `vec![].into_iter` was used intentionally or not here and not much benefit to changing it.
* any case where `vec![].into_iter` was used because we specifically needed a `Vec::IntoIter<T>`
* any case where it looked like we were intentionally using `vec![].into_iter` to test it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes it more uniform with other expanded nodes
|
|
ast: Avoid aborts on fatal errors thrown from mutable AST visitor
Set the node to some dummy value and rethrow the error instead.
When using the old aborting `visit_clobber` in `InvocationCollector::visit_crate` the next tests abort due to fatal errors:
```
ui\modules\path-invalid-form.rs
ui\modules\path-macro.rs
ui\modules\path-no-file-name.rs
ui\parser\issues\issue-5806.rs
ui\parser\mod_file_with_path_attr.rs
```
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91313.
|
|
Remove `SymbolStr`
This was originally proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74554#discussion_r466203544. As well as removing the icky `SymbolStr` type, it allows the removal of a lot of `&` and `*` occurrences.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
r=jackh726,pnkfelix
Stabilize `destructuring_assignment`
Closes #71126
- [Stabilization report](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71126#issuecomment-941148058)
- [Completed FCP](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71126#issuecomment-954914819)
`@rustbot` label +F-destructuring-assignment +T-lang
Also needs +relnotes but I don't have permission to add that tag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By changing `as_str()` to take `&self` instead of `self`, we can just
return `&str`. We're still lying about lifetimes, but it's a smaller lie
than before, where `SymbolStr` contained a (fake) `&'static str`!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set the node to some dummy value and rethwor the error instead.
|
|
Suggest the `pat_param` specifier before `|` on 2021 edition
Ran into this today after writing some Rust for the first time in a while.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
Bump stage0 compiler
r? `@pietroalbini` (or anyone else)
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a migration warning but no lint for users who have enabled the
new edition.
|
|
And stop creating a fake `mod` item for the crate root when expanding a crate.
|
|
Works as expected, and there are widespread reports of success with it,
as well as interest in it.
|
|
This feature is aimed at giving proc macros access to powers similar to
those used by builtin macros such as `format_args!` or `concat!`. These
macros are able to accept macros in place of string literal parameters,
such as the format string, as they perform recursive macro expansion
while being expanded.
This can be especially useful in many cases thanks to helper macros like
`concat!`, `stringify!` and `include_str!` which are often used to
construct string literals at compile-time in user code.
For now, this method only allows expanding macros which produce
literals, although more expresisons will be supported before the method
is stabilized.
|
|
The only reason to use `abort_if_errors` is when the program is so broken that either:
1. later passes get confused and ICE
2. any diagnostics from later passes would be noise
This is never the case for lints, because the compiler has to be able to deal with `allow`-ed lints.
So it can continue to lint and compile even if there are lint errors.
|
|
|
|
Add rustc lint, warning when iterating over hashmaps
r? rust-lang/wg-incr-comp
|
|
rustc_ast: Turn `MutVisitor::token_visiting_enabled` into a constant
It's a visitor property rather than something that needs to be determined at runtime
|
|
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
|
|
It's a visitor property rather than something that needs to be determined at runtime
|
|
The equivalent for `Symbol`s was renamed some time ago (`kw::Invalid` -> `kw::Empty`), and it makes sense to do the same thing for `Ident`s.
|
|
clippy::complexity fixes
|
|
|
|
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
