| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
(cherry picked from commit 5534cb0a4a3907db50956f7664ab2e5c3b2bc00a)
|
|
|
|
Remove lang feature for type ascription (since it's a lib feature now)
It's not necessary since it's a library feature now, via the type ascription macro. We can't (and shouldn't) register it as a removed feature since I think that would give "this feature has been removed" errors even for people using the macro (well, I'm pretty sure, though I didn't check).
r? `@Nilstrieb`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add AMX target-features and `x86_amx_intrinsics` feature flag
This is an effort towards #126622. This adds support for all 5 target-features for `AMX`, and introduces the feature flag `x86_amx_intrinsics`, which would gate these target-features and the yet-to-be-implemented amx intrinsics in stdarch.
|
|
|
|
Mark `builtin_syntax` as internal
Tracking issue literally says:
> There will never be a general stabilization.
cc #110680 `@est31`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked
in #83788).
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679
and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end
up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19
would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv`
ABI, which we do not want to do.
It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two
things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by
default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite
both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An
explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue`
feature.
I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead
of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both
`-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal
C ABI, just with different different treatment in
adjust_for_foreign_abi.
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Add `constness` to `TraitDef`
Second attempt at fixing the regression @ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120639#issuecomment-2198373716
r? project-const-traits
|
|
Match ergonomics 2024: Implement TC's match ergonomics proposal
Under gate `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2024_structural`. Enabling `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2024` at the same time allows the union of what the individual gates allow. `@traviscross`
r? `@Nadrieril`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123076
`@rustbot` label A-edition-2024 A-patterns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=estebank,workingjubilee
patchable-function-entry: Add unstable compiler flag and attribute
Tracking issue: #123115
Add the -Z patchable-function-entry compiler flag and the #[patchable_function_entry(prefix_nops = m, entry_nops = n)] attribute.
Rebased and adjusted the canditate implementation to match changes in the RFC.
|
|
Under gate `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2024_structural`.
Enabling `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2024` at the same time allows the union
of what the individual gates allow.
|
|
tests
|
|
See [RFC](https://github.com/maurer/rust-rfcs/blob/patchable-function-entry/text/0000-patchable-function-entry.md) (yet to be numbered)
TODO before submission:
* Needs an RFC
* Improve error reporting for malformed attributes
|
|
|
|
coverage: Overhaul validation of the `#[coverage(..)]` attribute
This PR makes sweeping changes to how the (currently-unstable) coverage attribute is validated:
- Multiple coverage attributes on the same item/expression are now treated as an error.
- The attribute must always be `#[coverage(off)]` or `#[coverage(on)]`, and the error messages for this are more consistent.
- A trailing comma is still allowed after off/on, since that's part of the normal attribute syntax.
- Some places that silently ignored a coverage attribute now produce an error instead.
- These cases were all clearly bugs.
- Some places that ignored a coverage attribute (with a warning) now produce an error instead.
- These were originally added as lints, but I don't think it makes much sense to knowingly allow new attributes to be used in meaningless places.
- Some of these errors might soon disappear, if it's easy to extend recursive coverage attributes to things like modules and impl blocks.
---
One of the goals of this PR is to lay a more solid foundation for making the coverage attribute recursive, so that it applies to all nested functions/closures instead of just the one it is directly attached to.
Fixes #126658.
This PR incorporates #126659, which adds more tests for validation of the coverage attribute.
`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
|
|
SmartPointer derive-macro
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
Possibly replacing #123472 for continued upkeep of the proposal rust-lang/rfcs#3621 and implementation of the tracking issue #123430.
cc `@Darksonn` `@wedsonaf`
|
|
|
|
It might make sense to allow this in the future, if we add values that aren't
mutually exclusive, but for now having multiple coverage attributes on one item
is useless.
|
|
Add hard error and migration lint for unsafe attrs
More implementation work for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123757
This adds the migration lint for unsafe attributes, as well as making it a hard error in Rust 2024.
|
|
|
|
make unsized_fn_params an internal feature
As suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123894#issuecomment-2054043053).
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123887 (kind of -- ICEs on internal features are considered acceptable so this issue is not-a-bug once this PR lands)
|
|
Co-authored-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
|
|
Remove use of const traits (and `feature(effects)`) from stdlib
The current uses are already unsound because they are using non-const impls in const contexts. We can reintroduce them by reverting the commit in this PR, after #120639 lands.
Also, make `effects` an incomplete feature.
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits`
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilise `c_unwind`
Fix #74990
Fix #115285 (that's also where FCP is happening)
Marking as draft PR for now due to `compiler_builtins` issues
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
r=fee1-dead
Remove now NOP attrs `#[rustc_dump{,_env}_program_clauses]`
Likely NOP since #113303.
r? `@fee1-dead`
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=estebank,davidtwco
Place tail expression behind terminating scope
This PR implements #123739 so that we can do further experiments in nightly.
A little rewrite has been applied to `for await` lowering. It was previously `unsafe { Pin::unchecked_new(into_async_iter(..)) }`. Under the edition 2024 rule, however, `into_async_iter` gets dropped at the end of the `unsafe` block. This presumably the first Edition 2024 migration rule goes by hoisting `into_async_iter(..)` into `match` one level above, so it now looks like the following.
```rust
match into_async_iter($iter_expr) {
ref mut iter => match unsafe { Pin::unchecked_new(iter) } {
...
}
}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a new concat metavar expr
Revival of #111930
Giving it another try now that #117050 was merged.
With the new rules, meta-variable expressions must be referenced with a dollar sign (`$`) and this can cause misunderstands with `$concat`.
```rust
macro_rules! foo {
( $bar:ident ) => {
const ${concat(VAR, bar)}: i32 = 1;
};
}
// Will produce `VARbar` instead of `VAR_123`
foo!(_123);
```
In other words, forgetting the dollar symbol can produce undesired outputs.
cc #29599
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
|
|
|
|
Bump stage0 to 1.80.0
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`,
`rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`.
For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess.
- There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g.
`allow`/`deny`/`feature`).
- Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes),
sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no
particular order.
- Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped
all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then
another `feature`.
This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates,
increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now
only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions.
Exceptions:
- `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`,
because they have no crate attributes.
- `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's
ignored in `rustfmt.toml`).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
