about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_feature/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-08-11Rework `NameValueStr`Esteban Küber-8/+8
2025-08-11Add more docs to templates for attrs with incorrect argumentsEsteban Küber-1/+4
2025-08-11Add link to docs on malformed attributesEsteban Küber-71/+270
2025-08-11Allow attr entries to declare list of alternatives for `List` and ↵Esteban Küber-72/+99
`NamedValueStr` Modify `AttributeTemplate` to support list of alternatives for list and name value attribute styles. Suggestions now provide more correct suggested code: ``` error[E0805]: malformed `used` attribute input --> $DIR/used_with_multi_args.rs:3:1 | LL | #[used(compiler, linker)] | ^^^^^^------------------^ | | | expected a single argument here | help: try changing it to one of the following valid forms of the attribute | LL - #[used(compiler, linker)] LL + #[used(compiler)] | LL - #[used(compiler, linker)] LL + #[used(linker)] | LL - #[used(compiler, linker)] LL + #[used] | ``` instead of the prior "masking" of the lack of this feature by suggesting pipe-separated lists: ``` error[E0805]: malformed `used` attribute input --> $DIR/used_with_multi_args.rs:3:1 | LL | #[used(compiler, linker)] | ^^^^^^------------------^ | | | expected a single argument here | help: try changing it to one of the following valid forms of the attribute | LL - #[used(compiler, linker)] LL + #[used(compiler|linker)] | LL - #[used(compiler, linker)] LL + #[used] | ```
2025-08-09Fix an unstable feature comment that wasn't a doc commentJosh Triplett-1/+1
Every other feature in the list uses a doc comment; fix one that used a regular comment to use a doc comment.
2025-08-08mbe: Parse macro attribute rulesJosh Triplett-0/+2
This handles various kinds of errors, but does not allow applying the attributes yet. This adds the feature gate `macro_attr`.
2025-08-07Auto merge of #145043 - Zalathar:rollup-3dbvdrm, r=Zalatharbors-0/+1
Rollup of 19 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#137831 (Tweak auto trait errors) - rust-lang/rust#138689 (add nvptx_target_feature) - rust-lang/rust#140267 (implement continue_ok and break_ok for ControlFlow) - rust-lang/rust#143028 (emit `StorageLive` and schedule `StorageDead` for `let`-`else`'s bindings after matching) - rust-lang/rust#143764 (lower pattern bindings in the order they're written and base drop order on primary bindings' order) - rust-lang/rust#143808 (Port `#[should_panic]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure ) - rust-lang/rust#143906 (Miri: non-deterministic floating point operations in `foreign_items`) - rust-lang/rust#143929 (Mark all deprecation lints in name resolution as deny-by-default and report-in-deps) - rust-lang/rust#144133 (Stabilize const TypeId::of) - rust-lang/rust#144369 (Upgrade semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros from warn to deny) - rust-lang/rust#144439 (Introduce ModernIdent type to unify macro 2.0 hygiene handling) - rust-lang/rust#144473 (Address libunwind.a inconsistency issues in the bootstrap program) - rust-lang/rust#144601 (Allow `cargo fix` to partially apply `mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes`) - rust-lang/rust#144650 (Additional tce tests) - rust-lang/rust#144659 (bootstrap: refactor mingw dist and fix gnullvm) - rust-lang/rust#144682 (Stabilize `strict_overflow_ops`) - rust-lang/rust#145026 (Update books) - rust-lang/rust#145033 (Reimplement `print_region` in `type_name.rs`.) - rust-lang/rust#145040 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#143857 (Port #[macro_export] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-08-07Rollup merge of #138689 - jedbrown:jed/nvptx-target-feature, r=ZuseZ4Stuart Cook-0/+1
add nvptx_target_feature Tracking issue: #141468 (nvptx), which is part of #44839 (catch-all arches) The feature gate is `#![feature(nvptx_target_feature)]` This exposes the target features `sm_20` through `sm_120a` [as defined](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.1/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTX.td#L59-L85) by LLVM. Cc: ``````@gonzalobg`````` ``````@rustbot`````` label +O-NVPTX +A-target-feature
2025-08-06replace version placeholderBoxy-4/+4
2025-08-01Remove the omit_gdb_pretty_printer_section attributebjorn3-7/+2
Disabling loading of pretty printers in the debugger itself is more reliable. Before this commit the .gdb_debug_scripts section couldn't be included in dylibs or rlibs as otherwise there is no way to disable the section anymore without recompiling the entire standard library.
2025-07-31remove rustc_attr_data_structuresJana Dönszelmann-2/+2
2025-07-19Mitigate `#[align]` name resolution ambiguity regression with a renameJieyou Xu-1/+2
From `#[align]` -> `#[rustc_align]`. Attributes starting with `rustc` are always perma-unstable and feature-gated by `feature(rustc_attrs)`. See regression RUST-143834. For the underlying problem where even introducing new feature-gated unstable built-in attributes can break user code such as ```rs macro_rules! align { () => { /* .. */ }; } pub(crate) use align; // `use` here becomes ambiguous ``` refer to RUST-134963. Since the `#[align]` attribute is still feature-gated by `feature(fn_align)`, we can rename it as a mitigation. Note that `#[rustc_align]` will obviously mean that current unstable user code using `feature(fn_aling)` will need additionally `feature(rustc_attrs)`, but this is a short-term mitigation to buy time, and is expected to be changed to a better name with less collision potential. See <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202025-07-17/near/529290371> where mitigation options were considered.
2025-07-17parse `const trait Trait`Deadbeef-0/+1
2025-07-15Implement other logicstiif-0/+4
2025-07-13update issue number for `const_trait_impl`Deadbeef-1/+1
2025-07-02Auto merge of #143214 - camsteffen:remove-let-chains-feature, r=est31bors-2/+2
Remove let_chains unstable feature Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53667#issuecomment-3016742982 (but then I also noticed rust-lang/rust#140722) This replaces the feature gate with a parser error that says let chains require 2024. A lot of tests were using the unstable feature. I either added edition:2024 to the test or split out the parts that require 2024.
2025-07-02Auto merge of #142974 - cuviper:stage0-bump, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-10/+10
Update stage0 to 1.89.0-beta.1 - Update version placeholders - Update stage0 to 1.89.0-beta.1 - Update `STAGE0_MISSING_TARGETS` - Update `cfg(bootstrap)` r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` try-job: dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl
2025-07-01Remove support for dyn*Michael Goulet-2/+3
2025-07-01Update version placeholdersJosh Stone-10/+10
2025-06-30Remove let_chains featureCameron Steffen-2/+2
2025-06-28fix typos on some doc commentsTshepang Mbambo-2/+2
2025-06-27Rollup merge of #139858 - oli-obk:new-const-traits-syntax, r=fee1-deadMatthias Krüger-3/+3
New const traits syntax This PR only affects the AST and doesn't actually change anything semantically. All occurrences of `~const` outside of libcore have been replaced by `[const]`. Within libcore we have to wait for rustfmt to be bumped in the bootstrap compiler. This will happen "automatically" (when rustfmt is run) during the bootstrap bump, as rustfmt converts `~const` into `[const]`. After this we can remove the `~const` support from the parser Caveat discovered during impl: there is no legacy bare trait object recovery for `[const] Trait` as that snippet in type position goes down the slice /array parsing code and will error r? ``@fee1-dead`` cc ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@traviscross`` ``@compiler-errors``
2025-06-27Rollup merge of #142671 - davidtwco:no-default-bounds-attr, r=lcnrGuillaume Gomez-0/+4
add #![rustc_no_implicit_bounds] Follow-up from rust-lang/rust#137944. Adds a new `rustc_attrs` attribute that stops rustc from adding any default bounds. Useful for tests where default bounds just add noise and make debugging harder. After reviewing all tests with `?Sized`, these tests seem like they could probably benefit from `#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]`. - Skipping most of `tests/ui/unsized` as these seem to want to test `?Sized` - Skipping tests that used `Box<T>` because it's still bound by `T: MetaSized` - Skipping parsing or other tests that cared about `?Sized` syntactically - Skipping tests for `derive(CoercePointee)` because this appears to check that the pointee type is relaxed with `?Sized` explicitly r? `@lcnr`
2025-06-26Change const trait bound syntax from ~const to [const]Oli Scherer-3/+3
2025-06-25Auto merge of #143026 - jdonszelmann:rollup-z7mkuyt, r=jdonszelmannbors-3/+4
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#142146 (Withdraw the claim `extern "C-cmse-nonsecure-*"` always matches `extern "C"`) - rust-lang/rust#142200 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [8/N]) - rust-lang/rust#142724 (Add runtime check to avoid overwrite arg in `Diag`) - rust-lang/rust#142809 (Add PrintTAFn flag for targeted type analysis printing) - rust-lang/rust#142976 (Check CoerceUnsized impl validity before coercing) - rust-lang/rust#142992 (Convert some ABI tests to use `extern "rust-invalid"`) - rust-lang/rust#143000 (Make `Sub`, `Mul`, `Div` and `Rem` `const_traits`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-06-25encode_cross_crate for hir attributesJana Dönszelmann-6/+1
2025-06-25compiler: Trim the misleading C of C-cmse from errorsJubilee Young-1/+1
2025-06-25compiler: remove misleading 'c' from `abi_c_cmse_nonsecure_call` featureJubilee Young-2/+3
2025-06-24Rollup merge of #138780 - trifectatechfoundation:loop_match_attr, ↵Jubilee-0/+15
r=oli-obk,traviscross Add `#[loop_match]` for improved DFA codegen tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132306 project goal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/258 This PR adds the `#[loop_match]` attribute, which aims to improve code generation for state machines. For some (very exciting) benchmarks, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/258#issuecomment-2732965199 Currently, a very restricted syntax pattern is accepted. We'd like to get feedback and merge this now before we go too far in a direction that others have concerns with. ## current state We accept code that looks like this ```rust #[loop_match] loop { state = 'blk: { match state { State::A => { #[const_continue] break 'blk State::B } State::B => { /* ... */ } /* ... */ } } } ``` - a loop should have the same semantics with and without `#[loop_match]`: normal `continue` and `break` continue to work - `#[const_continue]` is only allowed in loops annotated with `#[loop_match]` - the loop body needs to have this particular shape (a single assignment to the match scrutinee, with the body a labelled block containing just a match) ## future work - perform const evaluation on the `break` value - support more state/scrutinee types ## maybe future work - allow `continue 'label value` syntax, which `#[const_continue]` could then use. - allow the match to be on an arbitrary expression (e.g. `State::Initial`) - attempt to also optimize `break`/`continue` expressions that are not marked with `#[const_continue]` r? ``@traviscross``
2025-06-24Rollup merge of #142704 - tgross35:remove-concat_idents, r=fee1-deadGuillaume Gomez-0/+14
Remove the deprecated unstable `concat_idents!` macro In [rust-lang/rust#137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version 1.90). This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}` metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature. History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011 when it was introduced with 513276e595f8 ("Add #concat_idents[] and #ident_to_str[]"). The syntax looks a bit different but it still works about the same: let asdf_fdsa = "<.<"; assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<"); assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction] == "use_mention_distinction"); (That test existed from introduction until its removal here.) Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599 [rust-lang/rust#137653]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653 [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
2025-06-24Remove the deprecated `concat_idents!` macroTrevor Gross-0/+14
In [137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version 1.90). This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}` metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature. History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011 when it was introduced with 513276e595f8 ("Add #concat_idents[] and about the same: let asdf_fdsa = "<.<"; assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<"); assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction] == "use_mention_distinction"); (That test existed from introduction until its removal here.) Closes: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599 [137653]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653 [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
2025-06-23Port `#[rustc_skip_during_method_dispatch]` to the new attribute systemPavel Grigorenko-1/+1
2025-06-23Add `#[loop_match]` for improved DFA codegenbjorn3-0/+15
Co-authored-by: Folkert de Vries <folkert@folkertdev.nl>
2025-06-21add nvptx_target_featureJed Brown-0/+1
Add target features for sm_* and ptx*, both of which form a partial order, but cannot be combined to a single partial order. These mirror the LLVM target features, but we do not provide LLVM target processors (which imply both an sm_* and ptx* feature). Add some documentation for the nvptx target.
2025-06-21Port `#[rustc_pub_transparent]` to the new attribute systemPavel Grigorenko-1/+1
2025-06-19correct template for `#[align]`Folkert de Vries-1/+1
it should not suggest just `#[align]`
2025-06-18Rollup merge of #142507 - folkertdev:fn-align-align-attribute, r=jdonszelmannTrevor Gross-0/+1
use `#[align]` attribute for `fn_align` Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232 https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3806 decides to add the `#[align]` attribute for alignment of various items. Right now it's used for functions with `fn_align`, in the future it will get more uses (statics, struct fields, etc.) (the RFC finishes FCP today) r? `@ghost`
2025-06-18Rollup merge of #141610 - BoxyUwU:stabilize_generic_arg_infer, ↵Jakub Beránek-2/+2
r=lcnr,traviscross Stabilize `feature(generic_arg_infer)` Fixes rust-lang/rust#85077 r? lcnr cc ````@rust-lang/project-const-generics````
2025-06-18hir_analysis: add `#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]`David Wood-0/+4
Adds a new `rustc_attrs` attribute that stops rustc from adding any default bounds. Useful for tests where default bounds just add noise and make debugging harder.
2025-06-18add `#[align]` attributeFolkert de Vries-0/+1
Right now it's used for functions with `fn_align`, in the future it will get more uses (statics, struct fields, etc.)
2025-06-17fix bugs in inline/force_inline and diagnostics of all attr parsersJana Dönszelmann-9/+31
2025-06-17Auto merge of #137944 - davidtwco:sized-hierarchy, r=oli-obkbors-0/+2
Sized Hierarchy: Part I This patch implements the non-const parts of rust-lang/rfcs#3729. It introduces two new traits to the standard library, `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized`. See the RFC for the rationale behind these traits and to discuss whether this change makes sense in the abstract. These traits are unstable (as is their constness), so users cannot refer to them without opting-in to `feature(sized_hierarchy)`. These traits are not behind `cfg`s as this would make implementation unfeasible, there would simply be too many `cfg`s required to add the necessary bounds everywhere. So, like `Sized`, these traits are automatically implemented by the compiler. RFC 3729 describes changes which are necessary to preserve backwards compatibility given the introduction of these traits, which are implemented and as follows: - `?Sized` is rewritten as `MetaSized` - `MetaSized` is added as a default supertrait for all traits w/out an explicit sizedness supertrait already. There are no edition migrations implemented in this, as these are primarily required for the constness parts of the RFC and prior to stabilisation of this (and so will come in follow-up PRs alongside the const parts). All diagnostic output should remain the same (showing `?Sized` even if the compiler sees `MetaSized`) unless the `sized_hierarchy` feature is enabled. Due to the use of unstable extern types in the standard library and rustc, some bounds in both projects have had to be relaxed already - this is unfortunate but unavoidable so that these extern types can continue to be used where they were before. Performing these relaxations in the standard library and rustc are desirable longer-term anyway, but some bounds are not as relaxed as they ideally would be due to the inability to relax `Deref::Target` (this will be investigated separately). It is hoped that this is implemented such that it could be merged and these traits could exist "under the hood" without that being observable to the user (other than in any performance impact this has on the compiler, etc). Some details might leak through due to the standard library relaxations, but this has not been observed in test output. **Notes:** - Any commits starting with "upstream:" can be ignored, as these correspond to other upstream PRs that this is based on which have yet to be merged. - This best reviewed commit-by-commit. I've attempted to make the implementation easy to follow and keep similar changes and test output updates together. - Each commit has a short description describing its purpose. - This patch is large but it's primarily in the test suite. - I've worked on the performance of this patch and a few optimisations are implemented so that the performance impact is neutral-to-minor. - `PointeeSized` is a different name from the RFC just to make it more obvious that it is different from `std::ptr::Pointee` but all the names are yet to be bikeshed anyway. - `@nikomatsakis` has confirmed [that this can proceed as an experiment from the t-lang side](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/435869-project-goals/topic/SVE.20and.20SME.20on.20AArch64.20.28goals.23270.29/near/506196491) - FCP in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137944#issuecomment-2912207485 Fixes rust-lang/rust#79409. r? `@ghost` (I'll discuss this with relevant teams to find a reviewer)
2025-06-16trait_sel: `{Meta,Pointee}Sized` on `Sized` typesDavid Wood-0/+2
Introduce the `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` traits as supertraits of `Sized` and initially implement it on everything that currently implements `Sized` to isolate any changes that simply adding the traits introduces.
2025-06-15clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` commentDeadbeef-1/+1
2025-06-14Rollup merge of #141811 - mejrs:bye_locals, r=compiler-errorsMatthias Krüger-2/+2
Unimplement unsized_locals Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/630 Tracking issue here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111942 Note that this just removes the feature, not the implementation, and does not touch `unsized_fn_params`. This is because it is required to support `Box<dyn FnOnce()>: FnOnce()`. There may be more that should be removed (possibly in follow up prs) - the `forget_unsized` function and `forget` intrinsic. - the `unsized_locals` test directory; I've just fixed up the tests for now - various codegen support for unsized values and allocas cc ``@JakobDegen`` ``@oli-obk`` ``@Noratrieb`` ``@programmerjake`` ``@bjorn3`` ``@rustbot`` label F-unsized_locals Fixes rust-lang/rust#79409
2025-06-13Auto merge of #142443 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-l1l6d0v, r=matthiaskrgrbors-0/+2
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#128425 (Make `missing_fragment_specifier` an unconditional error) - rust-lang/rust#135927 (retpoline and retpoline-external-thunk flags (target modifiers) to enable retpoline-related target features) - rust-lang/rust#140770 (add `extern "custom"` functions) - rust-lang/rust#142176 (tests: Split dont-shuffle-bswaps along opt-levels and arches) - rust-lang/rust#142248 (Add supported asm types for LoongArch32) - rust-lang/rust#142267 (assert more in release in `rustc_ast_lowering`) - rust-lang/rust#142274 (Update the stdarch submodule) - rust-lang/rust#142276 (Update dependencies in `library/Cargo.lock`) - rust-lang/rust#142308 (Upgrade `object`, `addr2line`, and `unwinding` in the standard library) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#140920 (Extract some shared code from codegen backend target feature handling) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-gnu try-job: dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl try-job: test-various
2025-06-13Unimplement unsized_localsmejrs-2/+2
2025-06-12add `extern "custom"` functionsFolkert de Vries-0/+2
2025-06-12Rollup merge of #141162 - mejrs:gated, r=fee1-deadMatthias Krüger-110/+115
refactor `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature checking First commit changes the following: - `AttributeGate ` from an enum with (four) tuple fields to (five) named fields - adds a `notes` fields that is emitted as notes in the `PostExpansionVisitor` pass - removes the `this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date` note if the feature gate is `rustc_attrs`. - various phrasing changes and touchups - and finally, the reason why I went down this path to begin with: tell people they can use the diagnostic namespace when they hit the rustc_on_unimplemented feature gate 🙈 Second commit removes unused machinery for deprecated attributes
2025-06-11stabilize gaiBoxy-2/+2