| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Implement RFC 3348, `c"foo"` literals
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3348
Tracking issue: #105723
|
|
Add cross-language LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust compiler by adding the `-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang `-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e., non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Thank you again, ``@bjorn3,`` ``@nikic,`` ``@samitolvanen,`` and the Rust community for all the help!
|
|
This commit adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI)
support to the Rust compiler by adding the
`-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang
`-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more
information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the
Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and
-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e.,
non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark`feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)` and`feature(async_fn_in_trait)` as not incomplete
I think they've graduated, since as far as I'm aware, they don't cause compiler crashes or unsoundness anymore.
|
|
Stabilize debugger_visualizer
This stabilizes the `debugger_visualizer` attribute (#95939).
* Marks the `debugger_visualizer` feature as `accepted`.
* Marks the `debugger_visualizer` attribute as `ungated`.
* Deletes feature gate test, removes feature gate from other tests.
Closes #95939
|
|
|
|
Partial stabilisation of `c_unwind`
The stabilisation report is at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990#issuecomment-1363473645
cc `@rust-lang/wg-ffi-unwind`
|
|
|
|
|
|
[master] Bump stage0
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
rustdoc: Fix missing `repr` attribute in doc(inline) on foreign items
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110698.
r? `@notriddle`
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit abc0660118cc95f47445fd33502a11dd448f5968.
|
|
Report allocation errors as panics
OOM is now reported as a panic but with a custom payload type (`AllocErrorPanicPayload`) which holds the layout that was passed to `handle_alloc_error`.
This should be review one commit at a time:
- The first commit adds `AllocErrorPanicPayload` and changes allocation errors to always be reported as panics.
- The second commit removes `#[alloc_error_handler]` and the `alloc_error_hook` API.
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/192
Closes #51540
Closes #51245
|
|
|
|
* account
* achieved
* advising
* always
* ambiguous
* analysis
* annotations
* appropriate
* build
* candidates
* cascading
* category
* character
* clarification
* compound
* conceptually
* constituent
* consts
* convenience
* corresponds
* debruijn
* debug
* debugable
* debuggable
* deterministic
* discriminant
* display
* documentation
* doesn't
* ellipsis
* erroneous
* evaluability
* evaluate
* evaluation
* explicitly
* fallible
* fulfill
* getting
* has
* highlighting
* illustrative
* imported
* incompatible
* infringing
* initialized
* into
* intrinsic
* introduced
* javascript
* liveness
* metadata
* monomorphization
* nonexistent
* nontrivial
* obligation
* obligations
* offset
* opaque
* opportunities
* opt-in
* outlive
* overlapping
* paragraph
* parentheses
* poisson
* precisely
* predecessors
* predicates
* preexisting
* propagated
* really
* reentrant
* referent
* responsibility
* rustonomicon
* shortcircuit
* simplifiable
* simplifications
* specify
* stabilized
* structurally
* suggestibility
* translatable
* transmuting
* two
* unclosed
* uninhabited
* visibility
* volatile
* workaround
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
Split out a separate feature gate for impl trait in associated types
in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107645 it was decided that we'll take a new route for type alias impl trait. The exact route isn't clear yet, so while I'm working on implementing some of these proposed changes (e.g. in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110010) to be able to experiment with them, I will also work on stabilizing another sugar version first: impl trait in associated types. Similarly I'll look into creating feature gates for impl trait in const/static types.
This PR does nothing but split the feature gate, so that you need to enable a different feature gate for
```rust
impl Trait for Type {
type Assoc = impl SomeTrait;
}
```
than what you need for `type Foo = impl SomeTrait;`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add ability to transmute (somewhat) with generic consts in arrays
Previously if the expression contained generic consts and did not have a directly equivalent type, transmuting the type in this way was forbidden, despite the two sizes being identical. Instead, we should be able to lazily tell if the two consts are identical, and if so allow them to be transmuted.
This is done by normalizing the forms of expressions into sorted order of multiplied terms, which is not generic over all expressions, but should handle most cases.
This allows for some _basic_ transmutations between types that are equivalent in size without requiring additional stack space at runtime.
I only see one other location at which `SizeSkeleton` is being used, and it checks for equality so this shouldn't affect anywhere else that I can tell.
See [this Stackoverflow post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73085012/transmute-nested-const-generic-array-rust) for what was previously necessary to convert between types. This PR makes converting nested `T -> [T; 1]` transmutes possible, and `[uB*2; N] -> [uB; N * 2]` possible as well.
I'm not sure whether this is something that would be wanted, and if it is it definitely should not be insta-stable, so I'd add a feature gate.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #109104 (rustdoc: Fix invalid suggestions on ambiguous intra doc links v2)
- #109443 (Move `doc(primitive)` future incompat warning to `invalid_doc_attributes`)
- #109680 (Fix subslice capture in closure)
- #109798 (fluent_messages macro: don't emit the OS error in a note)
- #109805 (Source map cleanups)
- #109818 (rustdoc: Add GUI test for jump to collapsed item)
- #109820 (rustdoc-search: update docs for comma in `?` help popover)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Initial support for return type notation (RTN)
See: https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2023/02/13/return-type-notation-send-bounds-part-2/
1. Only supports `T: Trait<method(): Send>` style bounds, not `<T as Trait>::method(): Send`. Checking validity and injecting an implicit binder for all of the late-bound method generics is harder to do for the latter.
* I'd add this in a follow-up.
3. ~Doesn't support RTN in general type position, i.e. no `let x: <T as Trait>::method() = ...`~
* I don't think we actually want this.
5. Doesn't add syntax for "eliding" the function args -- i.e. for now, we write `method(): Send` instead of `method(..): Send`.
* May be a hazard if we try to add it in the future. I'll probably add it in a follow-up later, with a structured suggestion to change `method()` to `method(..)` once we add it.
7. ~I'm not in love with the feature gate name 😺~
* I renamed it to `return_type_notation` :heavy_check_mark:
Follow-up PRs will probably add support for `where T::method(): Send` bounds. I'm not sure if we ever want to support return-type-notation in arbitrary type positions. I may also make the bounds require `..` in the args list later.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Move items not part of this stabilization to 'lazy_cell' or 'once_cell_try'
|
|
|
|
Remove issue number for `link_cfg`
Fixes #72059
Per #37406 and its [unstable book entry](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/link-cfg.html), this is an internal feature, and therefore perma-unstable and not being tracked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit b379d216eefaba083a0627b1724d73f99d4bdf5c.
|
|
|
|
Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature
As best I can tell, this was stabilized for Edition 2021 in #88126 but the feature was never removed.
|
|
Stabilize cmpxchg16b_target_feature
Tracking issue for target features
+ #44839
stdarch issue
+ https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/issues/827
stdarch PR
+ https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1358
reference PR
+ https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1331
It's my first time contributing to rust-lang/rust. Please tell me if I missed something.
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `#![feature(target_feature_11)]`
## Stabilization report
### Summary
Allows for safe functions to be marked with `#[target_feature]` attributes.
Functions marked with `#[target_feature]` are generally considered as unsafe functions: they are unsafe to call, cannot be assigned to safe function pointers, and don't implement the `Fn*` traits.
However, calling them from other `#[target_feature]` functions with a superset of features is safe.
```rust
// Demonstration function
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn avx2() {}
fn foo() {
// Calling `avx2` here is unsafe, as we must ensure
// that AVX is available first.
unsafe {
avx2();
}
}
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn bar() {
// Calling `avx2` here is safe.
avx2();
}
```
### Test cases
Tests for this feature can be found in [`src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/b67ba9ba208ac918228a18321fc3a11a99b1c62b/src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/).
### Edge cases
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73631
Closures defined inside functions marked with `#[target_feature]` inherit the target features of their parent function. They can still be assigned to safe function pointers and implement the appropriate `Fn*` traits.
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn qux() {
let my_closure = || avx2(); // this call to `avx2` is safe
let f: fn() = my_closure;
}
```
This means that in order to call a function with `#[target_feature]`, you must show that the target-feature is available while the function executes *and* for as long as whatever may escape from that function lives.
### Documentation
- Reference: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1181
---
cc tracking issue #69098
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement partial support for non-lifetime binders
This implements support for non-lifetime binders. It's pretty useless currently, but I wanted to put this up so the implementation can be discussed.
Specifically, this piggybacks off of the late-bound lifetime collection code in `rustc_hir_typeck::collect::lifetimes`. This seems like a necessary step given the fact we don't resolve late-bound regions until this point, and binders are sometimes merged.
Q: I'm not sure if I should go along this route, or try to modify the earlier nameres code to compute the right bound var indices for type and const binders eagerly... If so, I'll need to rename all these queries to something more appropriate (I've done this for `resolve_lifetime::Region` -> `resolve_lifetime::ResolvedArg`)
cc rust-lang/types-team#81
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
