| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `#[cfg(panic = "...")]`
[Stabilization PR](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/stabilization_guide.html#stabilization-pr) for #77443
|
|
Update tracking issue numbers for inline assembly sub-features
The main tracking issue for inline assembly is [closed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72016#issuecomment-1022332954), further tracking of the remaining sub-features has been moved to separate tracking issues.
|
|
This was not intended to be stabilized yet.
|
|
|
|
This thus still makes it technically possible to enable the feature, and thus
to trigger UB without `unsafe`, but this is fine since incomplete features are
known to be potentially unsound (labelled "may not be safe").
This follows from the discussion at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93176#discussion_r799413561
|
|
the feature
|
|
Stabilize cfg_target_has_atomic
`target_has_atomic_equal_alignment` is now tracked separately in #93822.
Closes #32976
|
|
Complete removal of #[main] attribute from compiler
resolves #93786
---
The `#[main]` attribute was mostly removed from the language in #84217, but not completely. It is still recognized as a builtin attribute by the compiler, but it has no effect. However, this no-op attribute is no longer gated by `#[feature(main)]` (which no longer exists), so it's possible to include it in code *on stable* without any errors, which seems unintentional. For example, the following code is accepted ([playground link](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&code=%23%5Bmain%5D%0Afn%20main()%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20println!(%22hello%20world%22)%3B%0A%7D%0A)).
```rust
#[main]
fn main() {
println!("hello world");
}
```
Aside from that oddity, the existence of this attribute causes code like the following to fail ([playground link](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&code=use%20tokio%3A%3Amain%3B%0A%0A%23%5Bmain%5D%0Afn%20main()%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20println!(%22hello%20world%22)%3B%0A%7D%0A)). According https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84062#issuecomment-825038275, the removal of `#[main]` was expected to eliminate this conflict (previously reported as #62127).
```rust
use tokio::main;
#[main]
fn main() {
println!("hello world");
}
```
```
error[E0659]: `main` is ambiguous
--> src/main.rs:3:3
|
3 | #[main]
| ^^^^ ambiguous name
|
= note: ambiguous because of a name conflict with a builtin attribute
= note: `main` could refer to a built-in attribute
```
[This error message can be confusing](https://stackoverflow.com/q/71024443/1114), as the mostly-removed `#[main]` attribute is not mentioned in any documentation.
Since the current availability of `#[main]` on stable seems unintentional, and to needlessly block use of the `main` identifier in the attribute namespace, this PR finishes removing the `#[main]` attribute as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29634#issuecomment-274951753 by deleting it from `builtin_attrs.rs`, and adds two test cases to ensure that the attribute is no longer accepted and no longer conflicts with other attributes imported as `main`.
|
|
`#[used(linker)]` attribute
See https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme/issues/41#issuecomment-927255631.
|
|
Closes #32976
|
|
|
|
|
|
PatchMixolydic:where-in-the-world-is-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk
Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`
It previously pointed to #57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, #93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds.
Fixes #93679.
`````@rustbot````` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
|
|
remove `allow_fail` test flag
close #93345
|
|
|
|
|
|
It previously pointed to #57563, the conglomerate issue for
`const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`).
`const_fn_trait_bounds` weren't mentioned here, so this commit changes
its tracking issue to a new one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Implement stable overlap check considering negative traits
This PR implement the new disjointness rules for overlap check described in https://rust-lang.github.io/negative-impls-initiative/explainer/coherence-check.html#new-disjointness-rules
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
|
|
|
|
|
|
allow eq constraints on associated constants
Updates #70256
(cc `@varkor,` `@Centril)`
|
|
Add some more attribute validation
This adds some more validation for the position of attributes:
* `link` is only valid on an `extern` block
* `windows_subsystem` and `no_builtins` are only valid at the crate level
|
|
Also prevent ICE when adding a const in associated const equality.
|
|
r=Aaron1011
Implement `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` attribute
This PR adds a new attribute — `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` that allows changing the "minimal complete definition" of a trait. It's similar to GHC's minimal `{-# MINIMAL #-}` pragma, though `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` is weaker atm.
Such attribute was long wanted. It can be, for example, used in `Read` trait to make transitions to recently added `read_buf` easier:
```rust
#[rustc_must_implement_one_of(read, read_buf)]
pub trait Read {
fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize> {
let mut buf = ReadBuf::new(buf);
self.read_buf(&mut buf)?;
Ok(buf.filled_len())
}
fn read_buf(&mut self, buf: &mut ReadBuf<'_>) -> Result<()> {
default_read_buf(|b| self.read(b), buf)
}
}
impl Read for Ty0 {}
//^ This will fail to compile even though all `Read` methods have default implementations
// Both of these will compile just fine
impl Read for Ty1 {
fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize> { /* ... */ }
}
impl Read for Ty2 {
fn read_buf(&mut self, buf: &mut ReadBuf<'_>) -> Result<()> { /* ... */ }
}
```
For now, this is implemented as an internal attribute to start experimenting on the design of this feature. In the future we may want to extend it:
- Allow arbitrary requirements like `a | (b & c)`
- Allow multiple requirements like
- ```rust
#[rustc_must_implement_one_of(a, b)]
#[rustc_must_implement_one_of(c, d)]
```
- Make it appear in rustdoc documentation
- Change the syntax?
- Etc
Eventually, we should make an RFC and make this (or rather similar) attribute public.
---
I'm fairly new to compiler development and not at all sure if the implementation makes sense, but at least it passes tests :)
|
|
includes minor refactorings
|
|
These attributes are only checked at the crate root, so they should
have a warning if they are used anywhere else.
|
|
Useful for thin wrapper attributes that are best passed as value instead
of reference.
|
|
Use "(associated) function" terminology instead of "method".
Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create rustdoc_internals feature gate
As suggested by ``@camelid`` [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90398#issuecomment-955093851), since `doc_keyword` and `doc_primitive` aren't meant to be stabilized, we could put them behind a same feature flag.
This is pretty much what it would look like (needs to update the tests too).
The tracking issue is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90418.
What do you think ``@rust-lang/rustdoc`` ?
|
|
|
|
Split inline const to two feature gates and mark expression position inline const complete
This PR splits inline const in pattern position into its own `#![feature(inline_const_pat)]` feature gate, and make the usage in expression position complete.
I think I have resolved most outstanding issues related to `inline_const` with #89561 and other PRs. The only thing left that I am aware of is #90150 and the lack of lifetime checks when inline const is used in pattern position (FIXME in #89561). Implementation-wise when used in pattern position it has to be lowered during MIR building while in expression position it's evaluated only when monomorphizing (just like normal consts), so it makes some sense to separate it into two feature gates so one can progress without being blocked by another.
``@rustbot`` label: T-compiler F-inline_const
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This function parameter attribute was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44866 as an intermediate step in implementing `impl Trait`, it's not necessary or used anywhere by itself.
|
|
This should significantly reduce the frequency of merge conflicts.
|
|
Works as expected, and there are widespread reports of success with it,
as well as interest in it.
|
|
Stabilize `const_raw_ptr_deref` for `*const T`
This stabilizes dereferencing immutable raw pointers in const contexts.
It does not stabilize `*mut T` dereferencing. This is behind the
same feature gate as mutable references.
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51911
|
