about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-01-31Rollup merge of #136270 - nnethercote:rm-NamedVarMap, r=jackh726Jacob Pratt-68/+26
Remove `NamedVarMap`. `NamedVarMap` is extremely similar to `ResolveBoundVars`. The former contains two `UnordMap<ItemLocalId, T>` fields (obscured behind `ItemLocalMap` typedefs). The latter contains two `SortedMap<ItemLocalId, T>` fields. We construct a `NamedVarMap` and then convert it into a `ResolveBoundVars` by sorting the `UnordMap`s, which is unnecessary busywork. This commit removes `NamedVarMap` and constructs a `ResolveBoundVars` directly. `SortedMap` and `NamedVarMap` have slightly different perf characteristics during construction (e.g. speed of insertion) but this code isn't hot enough for that to matter. A few details to note. - A `FIXME` comment is removed. - The detailed comments on the fields of `NamedVarMap` are copied to `ResolveBoundVars` (which has a single, incorrect comment). - `BoundVarContext::map` is renamed. - `ResolveBoundVars` gets a derived `Default` impl. r? `@jackh726`
2025-01-31Don't export `rustc_hir_analysis::collect`.Nicholas Nethercote-12/+12
Instead re-export `rustc_hir_analysis::collect::suggest_impl_trait`, which is the only thing from the module used in another crate. This fixes a `FIXME` comment. Also adjust some visibilities to satisfy the `unreachable_pub` lint. This changes requires downgrading a link in a comment on `FnCtxt` because `collect` is no longer public and rustdoc complains otherwise. This is annoying but I can't see how to avoid it.
2025-01-31Remove `xform` submodule.Nicholas Nethercote-26/+19
It used to be bigger, with an `Xform` trait, but now it has just a single function.
2025-01-31Remove an unnecessary loop label.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
2025-01-31Fix a comment typo.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
2025-01-31Use `.and` chaining to improve readability.Nicholas Nethercote-20/+16
2025-01-31Remove an unnecessary lifetime from `RemapLateParam`.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+4
2025-01-31Remove an unused arg from the trait method `provided_kind`.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+1
2025-01-31Remove unnecessary builders.Nicholas Nethercote-193/+139
`delegation.rs` has three builders: `GenericsBuilder`, `PredicatesBuilder`, and `GenericArgsBuilder`. The first two builders have just two optional parameters, and the third one has zero. Each builder is used within a single function. The code is over-engineered. This commit removes the builders, replacing each with with a single `build_*` function. This makes the code shorter and simpler.
2025-01-31Format `delegation.rs` better.Nicholas Nethercote-22/+15
There is a comment `Delegation to inherent methods is not yet supported.` that appears three times mid-pattern and somehow inhibits rustfmt from formatting the enclosing `match` statement. This commit moves them to the top of the pattern, which enables more formatting.
2025-01-31Merge two identical match arms.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+2
Note: `inherit_predicates_for_delegation_item` already has these cases merged.
2025-01-31Remove an out-of-date `FIXME` comment.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+4
This comment made sense when this crate was called `rustc_typeck`, but makes less sense now that it's called `rustc_hir_analysis`. Especially given that `check_drop_impl` is only called within the crate.
2025-01-31Merge two `match` arms that are identical.Nicholas Nethercote-11/+6
Also rewrite the merged arm slightly to more closely match the arm above it.
2025-01-31Avoid a duplicated error case in `fn_sig_suggestion`.Nicholas Nethercote-9/+5
2025-01-31Clarify a comment.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+2
I was confused here for a bit.
2025-01-30Filter out RPITITs when suggesting unconstrained assoc type on too many genericsMichael Goulet-0/+1
2025-01-30review comment: change `span` argumentEsteban Küber-4/+4
2025-01-30When encountering unexpected closure return type, point at return ↵Esteban Küber-0/+4
type/expression ``` error[E0271]: expected `{closure@fallback-closure-wrap.rs:18:40}` to be a closure that returns `()`, but it returns `!` --> $DIR/fallback-closure-wrap.rs:19:9 | LL | let error = Closure::wrap(Box::new(move || { | ------- LL | panic!("Can't connect to server."); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `()`, found `!` | = note: expected unit type `()` found type `!` = note: required for the cast from `Box<{closure@$DIR/fallback-closure-wrap.rs:18:40: 18:47}>` to `Box<dyn FnMut()>` ``` ``` error[E0271]: expected `{closure@dont-ice-for-type-mismatch-in-closure-in-async.rs:6:10}` to be a closure that returns `bool`, but it returns `Option<()>` --> $DIR/dont-ice-for-type-mismatch-in-closure-in-async.rs:6:16 | LL | call(|| -> Option<()> { | ---- ------^^^^^^^^^^ | | | | | expected `bool`, found `Option<()>` | required by a bound introduced by this call | = note: expected type `bool` found enum `Option<()>` note: required by a bound in `call` --> $DIR/dont-ice-for-type-mismatch-in-closure-in-async.rs:3:25 | LL | fn call(_: impl Fn() -> bool) {} | ^^^^ required by this bound in `call` ``` ``` error[E0271]: expected `{closure@f670.rs:28:13}` to be a closure that returns `Result<(), _>`, but it returns `!` --> f670.rs:28:20 | 28 | let c = |e| -> ! { | -------^ | | | expected `Result<(), _>`, found `!` ... 32 | f().or_else(c); | ------- required by a bound introduced by this call -Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs:1433:28 | = note: expected enum `Result<(), _>` found type `!` note: required by a bound in `Result::<T, E>::or_else` --> /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/core/src/result.rs:1406:39 | 1406 | pub fn or_else<F, O: FnOnce(E) -> Result<T, F>>(self, op: O) -> Result<T, F> { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Result::<T, E>::or_else` ```
2025-01-30Do not treat vtable supertraits as distinct when bound with different bound varsMichael Goulet-2/+2
2025-01-30Rework rustc_dump_vtableMichael Goulet-6/+89
2025-01-30Auto merge of #136038 - compiler-errors:outlives, r=lcnrbors-62/+31
Simplify and consolidate the way we handle construct `OutlivesEnvironment` for lexical region resolution This is best reviewed commit-by-commit. I tried to consolidate the API for lexical region resolution *first*, then change the API when it was finally behind a single surface. r? lcnr or reassign
2025-01-30Remove `NamedVarMap`.Nicholas Nethercote-68/+26
`NamedVarMap` is extremely similar to `ResolveBoundVars`. The former contains two `UnordMap<ItemLocalId, T>` fields (obscured behind `ItemLocalMap` typedefs). The latter contains two `SortedMap<ItemLocalId, T>` fields. We construct a `NamedVarMap` and then convert it into a `ResolveBoundVars` by sorting the `UnordMap`s, which is unnecessary busywork. This commit removes `NamedVarMap` and constructs a `ResolveBoundVars` directly. `SortedMap` and `NamedVarMap` have slightly different perf characteristics during construction (e.g. speed of insertion) but this code isn't hot enough for that to matter. A few details to note. - A `FIXME` comment is removed. - The detailed comments on the fields of `NamedVarMap` are copied to `ResolveBoundVars` (which has a single, incorrect comment). - `BoundVarContext::map` is renamed. - `ResolveBoundVars` gets a derived `Default` impl.
2025-01-29Eliminate PatKind::PathOli Scherer-3/+2
2025-01-28Make item self/non-self bound naming less whackMichael Goulet-14/+13
2025-01-28Move outlives env computation into methodsMichael Goulet-7/+10
2025-01-28Consolidate OutlivesEnv construction with resolve_regionsMichael Goulet-57/+23
2025-01-27Rollup merge of #136114 - compiler-errors:more-idents, r=jieyouxuGuillaume Gomez-34/+33
Use identifiers more in diagnostics code This should make the diagnostics code slightly more correct when rendering idents in mixed crate edition situations. Kinda a no-op, but a cleanup regardless. r? oli-obk or reassign
2025-01-27Remove redundant to_ident_string callsMichael Goulet-1/+1
2025-01-27Use identifiers in diagnostics more oftenMichael Goulet-33/+32
2025-01-27Add `TooGeneric` variant to `LayoutError` and emit `Unknown` oneFedericoBruzzone-2/+6
- `check-pass` test for a MRE of #135020 - fail test for #135138 - switch to `TooGeneric` for checking CMSE fn signatures - switch to `TooGeneric` for compute `SizeSkeleton` (for transmute) - fix broken tests
2025-01-26Compiler: Finalize dyn compatibility renamingLeón Orell Valerian Liehr-2/+1
2025-01-25Rollup merge of #135951 - yotamofek:use-debug-helpers, r=SparrowLiiJacob Pratt-32/+31
Use `fmt::from_fn` in more places in the compiler Use the unstable functions from #117729 in more places in the compiler, follow up to #135494
2025-01-25Rollup merge of #135971 - compiler-errors:self-projection, r=fmeaseMatthias Krüger-8/+8
Properly report error when object type param default references self I accidentally broke this error for cases where a type parameter references `Self` via a projection (i.e. `trait Foo<Arg = Self::Bar> {}`). This PR fixes that, and also makes the error a bit easier to understand. Fixes #135918
2025-01-24use `fmt::from_fn` in more places, instead of using structs that impl ↵Yotam Ofek-32/+31
formatting traits
2025-01-24Auto merge of #135272 - BoxyUwU:generic_arg_infer_reliability_2, ↵bors-103/+107
r=compiler-errors Forbid usage of `hir` `Infer` const/ty variants in ambiguous contexts The feature `generic_arg_infer` allows providing `_` as an argument to const generics in order to infer them. This introduces a syntactic ambiguity as to whether generic arguments are type or const arguments. In order to get around this we introduced a fourth `GenericArg` variant, `Infer` used to represent `_` as an argument to generic parameters when we don't know if its a type or a const argument. This made hir visitors that care about `TyKind::Infer` or `ConstArgKind::Infer` very error prone as checking for `TyKind::Infer`s in `visit_ty` would find *some* type infer arguments but not *all* of them as they would sometimes be lowered to `GenericArg::Infer` instead. Additionally the `visit_infer` method would previously only visit `GenericArg::Infer` not *all* infers (e.g. `TyKind::Infer`), this made it very easy to override `visit_infer` and expect it to visit all infers when in reality it would only visit *some* infers. --- This PR aims to fix those issues by making the `TyKind` and `ConstArgKind` types generic over whether the infer types/consts are represented by `Ty/ConstArgKind::Infer` or out of line (e.g. by a `GenericArg::Infer` or accessible by overiding `visit_infer`). We then make HIR Visitors convert all const args and types to the versions where infer vars are stored out of line and call `visit_infer` in cases where a `Ty`/`Const` would previously have had a `Ty/ConstArgKind::Infer` variant: API Summary ```rust enum AmbigArg {} enum Ty/ConstArgKind<Unambig = ()> { ... Infer(Unambig), } impl Ty/ConstArg { fn try_as_ambig_ty/ct(self) -> Option<Ty/ConstArg<AmbigArg>>; } impl Ty/ConstArg<AmbigArg> { fn as_unambig_ty/ct(self) -> Ty/ConstArg; } enum InferKind { Ty(Ty), Const(ConstArg), Ambig(InferArg), } trait Visitor { ... fn visit_ty/const_arg(&mut self, Ty/ConstArg<AmbigArg>) -> Self::Result; fn visit_infer(&mut self, id: HirId, sp: Span, kind: InferKind) -> Self::Result; } // blanket impl'd, not meant to be overriden trait VisitorExt { fn visit_ty/const_arg_unambig(&mut self, Ty/ConstArg) -> Self::Result; } fn walk_unambig_ty/const_arg(&mut V, Ty/ConstArg) -> Self::Result; fn walk_ty/const_arg(&mut V, Ty/ConstArg<AmbigArg>) -> Self::Result; ``` The end result is that `visit_infer` visits *all* infer args and is also the *only* way to visit an infer arg, `visit_ty` and `visit_const_arg` can now no longer encounter a `Ty/ConstArgKind::Infer`. Representing this in the type system means that it is now very difficult to mess things up, either accessing `TyKind::Infer` "just works" and you won't miss *some* type infers- or it doesn't work and you have to look at `visit_infer` or some `GenericArg::Infer` which forces you to think about the full complexity involved. Unfortunately there is no lint right now about explicitly matching on uninhabited variants, I can't find the context for why this is the case :woman_shrugging: I'm not convinced the framing of un/ambig ty/consts is necessarily the right one but I'm not sure what would be better. I somewhat like calling them full/partial types based on the fact that `Ty<Partial>`/`Ty<Full>` directly specifies how many of the type kinds are actually represented compared to `Ty<Ambig>` which which leaves that to the reader to figure out based on the logical consequences of it the type being in an ambiguous position. --- tool changes have been modified in their own commits for easier reviewing by anyone getting cc'd from subtree changes. I also attempted to split out "bug fixes arising from the refactoring" into their own commit so they arent lumped in with a big general refactor commit Fixes #112110
2025-01-24Rollup merge of #135865 - zachs18:maybe_report_similar_assoc_fn_more, ↵Matthias Krüger-6/+14
r=compiler-errors For E0223, suggest associated functions that are similar to the path, even if the base type has multiple inherent impl blocks. Currently, the "help: there is an associated function with a similar name `from_utf8`" suggestion for `String::from::utf8` is only given if `String` has exactly one inherent `impl` item. This PR makes the suggestion be emitted even if the base type has multiple inherent `impl` items. Example: ```rust struct Foo; impl Foo { fn bar_baz() {} } impl Foo {} // load-bearing fn main() { Foo::bar::baz; } ``` Nightly/stable output: ```rust error[E0223]: ambiguous associated type --> f.rs:7:5 | 7 | Foo::bar::baz; | ^^^^^^^^ | help: if there were a trait named `Example` with associated type `bar` implemented for `Foo`, you could use the fully-qualified path | 7 | <Foo as Example>::bar::baz; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ error: aborting due to 1 previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0223`. ``` Output with this PR, or without the load-bearing empty impl on nightly/stable: ```rust error[E0223]: ambiguous associated type --> f.rs:7:5 | 7 | Foo::bar::baz; | ^^^^^^^^ | help: there is an associated function with a similar name: `bar_baz` | 7 | Foo::bar_baz; | ~~~~~~~ error: aborting due to 1 previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0223`. ``` Ideally, this suggestion would also work for non-ADT types like ~~`str::char::indices`~~ (edit: latest commit makes this work with primitives) or `<dyn Any>::downcast::mut_unchecked`, but that seemed to be a harder change. `@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
2025-01-24Properly report error when object type param default references selfMichael Goulet-8/+8
2025-01-23`visit_x_unambig`Boxy-22/+22
2025-01-23Semantic changes from new hir representationBoxy-39/+28
Always lower to `GenericArg::Infer` Update `PlaceholderCollector` Update closure lifetime binder infer var visitor Fallback visitor handle ambig infer args Ensure type infer args have their type recorded
2025-01-23Split hir `TyKind` and `ConstArgKind` in two and update `hir::Visitor`Boxy-57/+64
2025-01-23Make `hir::TyKind::TraitObject` use tagged ptrBoxy-7/+15
2025-01-22Rollup merge of #135816 - BoxyUwU:root_normalizes_to_goal_ice, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-5/+5
Use `structurally_normalize` instead of manual `normalizes-to` goals in alias relate errors r? `@lcnr` I added `structurally_normalize_term` so that code that is generic over ty or const can use the structurally normalize helpers. See `tests/ui/traits/next-solver/diagnostics/alias_relate_error_uses_structurally_normalize.rs` for a description of the reason for the (now fixed) ICEs
2025-01-22Refactor dyn-compatibility error and suggestionsTaylor Cramer-1/+1
This CL makes a number of small changes to dyn compatibility errors: - "object safety" has been renamed to "dyn-compatibility" throughout - "Convert to enum" suggestions are no longer generated when there exists a type-generic impl of the trait or an impl for `dyn OtherTrait` - Several error messages are reorganized for user readability Additionally, the dyn compatibility error creation code has been split out into functions. cc #132713 cc #133267
2025-01-22Also check for associated fns on primitives in E0223 similar-path check.Zachary S-3/+9
2025-01-22For E0223, suggest associated functions that are similar to the path, even ↵Zachary S-4/+6
if there are multiple inherent impls to check.
2025-01-22Rename `structurally_normalize` to `structurally_normalize_ty`Boxy-5/+5
2025-01-21Rollup merge of #135706 - compiler-errors:elaborate, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-1/+2
Move `supertrait_def_ids` into the elaborate module like all other fns It's strange that this is the only elaborate-like fn on tcx. r? lcnr
2025-01-21Auto merge of #134299 - RalfJung:remove-start, r=compiler-errorsbors-139/+1
remove support for the (unstable) #[start] attribute As explained by `@Noratrieb:` `#[start]` should be deleted. It's nothing but an accidentally leaked implementation detail that's a not very useful mix between "portable" entrypoint logic and bad abstraction. I think the way the stable user-facing entrypoint should work (and works today on stable) is pretty simple: - `std`-using cross-platform programs should use `fn main()`. the compiler, together with `std`, will then ensure that code ends up at `main` (by having a platform-specific entrypoint that gets directed through `lang_start` in `std` to `main` - but that's just an implementation detail) - `no_std` platform-specific programs should use `#![no_main]` and define their own platform-specific entrypoint symbol with `#[no_mangle]`, like `main`, `_start`, `WinMain` or `my_embedded_platform_wants_to_start_here`. most of them only support a single platform anyways, and need cfg for the different platform's ways of passing arguments or other things *anyways* `#[start]` is in a super weird position of being neither of those two. It tries to pretend that it's cross-platform, but its signature is a total lie. Those arguments are just stubbed out to zero on ~~Windows~~ wasm, for example. It also only handles the platform-specific entrypoints for a few platforms that are supported by `std`, like Windows or Unix-likes. `my_embedded_platform_wants_to_start_here` can't use it, and neither could a libc-less Linux program. So we have an attribute that only works in some cases anyways, that has a signature that's a total lie (and a signature that, as I might want to add, has changed recently, and that I definitely would not be comfortable giving *any* stability guarantees on), and where there's a pretty easy way to get things working without it in the first place. Note that this feature has **not** been RFCed in the first place. *This comment was posted [in May](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29633#issuecomment-2088596042) and so far nobody spoke up in that issue with a usecase that would require keeping the attribute.* Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29633 try-job: x86_64-gnu-nopt try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc-2 try-job: test-various
2025-01-21Move supertrait_def_ids into the elaborate module like all other fnsMichael Goulet-1/+2
2025-01-21remove support for the #[start] attributeRalf Jung-139/+1